> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All > members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. > > I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP > PMC unless there is a certain issue.
I think it’s acceptable to invite all active committers. >> I suggest initiating a vote at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> regarding the >> proposed consensus and encourage everyone to participate. >> All PPMC members must cast their votes, while committers are welcome to >> leave comments. > > I think this could be a good way. Our current discussion has been > going on for a relatively long time. > We may need a clearer context for posting ideas to encourage active > participation from all. I agree with it. Perhaps it would be better to summarize to a clearer background and start voting. Furthermore, I think it is also important to listen to committer's thoughts. > I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the > graduation discussion and moving forward tasks. Sorry for late response. I’m a little busy recently. > 2023年11月30日 16:12，tison <[email protected]> 写道： > >> warm-hearted committer > > My experience is that PMC members generally take more responsibility > instead of authority on project management. > > If one submits patches, report issues, or evangelize the project, I'd > regard the people as a committer who commits to evolving the project. > > Then, if any contributor (no matter whether or not he/she is a > committer already) shows interest in participate in project management > and showing a good understanding, I'll regard them as a PMC member > candidate. > > Management includes reviewing/replying other's > contributions/questions, and take actions on CVE, release, etc. > > I have a loose concern that OpenDAL has a much higher bar on PMC > members than committers. If you take a look at the News section in our > status page [1], you will find that we nominate many more committers > than PMC members, while some of them are around for a while also and > even acts as release manager. > >> Let's seize this opportunity to nominate more PMC members. > > It's not a goal to "nominate more PMC members", at least not at this > purpose. But we can review the unspoken bar and nominate new PMC > member according to our understanding. If you'd like to nominate > certain people (with their names referred), note that you should start > a new thread in private@. > > Best, > tison. > > [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/opendal.html > > Cai Lue <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 15:34写道： >> >> Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy dealing with my university >> graduation issues this week. >> >>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All >>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. >>> >>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP >>> PMC unless there is a certain issue. >> >> It will be acceptable if every warm-hearted committer could be included. >> >> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement on the >>> members of the PMC[1]. >>> >>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All >>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC. >>> >>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP >>> PMC unless there is a certain issue. >>> >>> And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above. >>> >>> Best, >>> tison. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616 >>>
