Taking into account feedback from PPMC members, I propose the following: 

Initiate an invitation to all committers at [email protected] with a three-day response 
timeout. Committers interested in taking the responsibilities of PPMC members 
can respond according to their own preference.

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023, at 16:52, Mingzhuo Yin wrote:
>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All 
>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC.
>> 
>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP
>> PMC unless there is a certain issue.
>
>
> I think it’s acceptable to invite all active committers. 
>
>>> I suggest initiating a vote at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> regarding the 
>>> proposed consensus and encourage everyone to participate.
>>> All PPMC members must cast their votes, while committers are welcome to 
>>> leave comments.
>> 
>> I think this could be a good way. Our current discussion has been
>> going on for a relatively long time.
>> We may need a clearer context for posting ideas to encourage active
>> participation from all.
>
>
> I agree with it. Perhaps it would be better to summarize to a clearer 
> background and start voting. Furthermore, I think it is also important 
> to listen to committer's thoughts.
>
>> I agree that this is a concern that the PPMC is less active in the
>> graduation discussion and moving forward tasks.
>
> Sorry for late response. I’m a little busy recently.
>
>> 2023年11月30日 16:12,tison <[email protected]> 写道:
>> 
>>> warm-hearted committer
>> 
>> My experience is that PMC members generally take more responsibility
>> instead of authority on project management.
>> 
>> If one submits patches, report issues, or evangelize the project, I'd
>> regard the people as a committer who commits to evolving the project.
>> 
>> Then, if any contributor (no matter whether or not he/she is a
>> committer already) shows interest in participate in project management
>> and showing a good understanding, I'll regard them as a PMC member
>> candidate.
>> 
>> Management includes reviewing/replying other's
>> contributions/questions, and take actions on CVE, release, etc.
>> 
>> I have a loose concern that OpenDAL has a much higher bar on PMC
>> members than committers. If you take a look at the News section in our
>> status page [1], you will find that we nominate many more committers
>> than PMC members, while some of them are around for a while also and
>> even acts as release manager.
>> 
>>> Let's seize this opportunity to nominate more PMC members.
>> 
>> It's not a goal to "nominate more PMC members", at least not at this
>> purpose. But we can review the unspoken bar and nominate new PMC
>> member according to our understanding. If you'd like to nominate
>> certain people (with their names referred), note that you should start
>> a new thread in private@.
>> 
>> Best,
>> tison.
>> 
>> [1] https://incubator.apache.org/projects/opendal.html
>> 
>> Cai Lue <[email protected]> 于2023年11月30日周四 15:34写道:
>>> 
>>> Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy dealing with my university 
>>> graduation issues this week.
>>> 
>>>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All 
>>>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP
>>>> PMC unless there is a certain issue.
>>> 
>>> It will be acceptable if every warm-hearted committer could be included.
>>> 
>>> On 2023/11/18 11:13:33 tison wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Here is a sub-object on the project graduation - Have an agreement on the
>>>> members of the PMC[1].
>>>> 
>>>> Generally, all members of the PPMC will be included in the TLP PMC. All
>>>> members of the IPC will be invited to join the TLP PMC.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll additionally suggest including all the current committers in the TLP
>>>> PMC unless there is a certain issue.
>>>> 
>>>> And this thread is to reach a consensus on the proposal above.
>>>> 
>>>> Best,
>>>> tison.
>>>> 
>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-opendal/issues/3616
>>>>

-- 
Xuanwo

Reply via email to