Are we going to have problems with the "Eclipse Public License" and the "Apache Licence". I don't find a place stating they are compatible. http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php
[]s, Thiago. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:14 AM Subject: Re: tomee webapp proposal To: [email protected] nop :p - Romain 2012/5/29 dsh <[email protected]> > You are a troll again aren't you :D > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for refrech button (wouldnt loose any resource for a refesh of the > logs) > > > > eclipse eclipse...all modular apps are not eclipse like :p (i hope so at > > least) > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> > > > >> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that hangs > >> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser > should be > >> able to handle it. > >> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load the > >> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new > interface > >> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think? > >> > >> >> Eclipse RAP > >> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely > take a > >> look. Thanks! > >> > >> Thiago. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the > >> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting > >> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the > >> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would > >> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does such > >> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery... > >> > > >> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse perspective/view > >> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an > >> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI > >> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :) > >> > > >> > Cheers > >> > Daniel > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read > the > >> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O) > >> > > > >> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating in > >> > > similar to digg.com? > >> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have > experience > >> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this > >> feature > >> > > available at the server side. > >> > > > >> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and > two > >> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices): > >> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png > >> > > > >> > > What you guys think? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks for the feedback! > >> > > []s, > >> > > Thiago. > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <[email protected] > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to > >> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log > >> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer where > >> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com? > >> > >> > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> Daniel > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi < > [email protected] > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Guys, > >> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new > webapp. > >> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one > which > >> > will > >> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and > the > >> > tomee > >> > >> > log file. > >> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it: > >> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png > >> > >> > > >> > >> > What do you think? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > Thiago. > >> > >> > >> > > >> >
