Here is our policy for what it is worth: http://maven.apache.org/developers/dependency-policies.html
Note: our policy has some h(y|i)st(e|o)rical reasons for existence as well, ones which OpenEJB may not feel necessary... On 29 May 2012 15:06, Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > My understanding is that if you depend on the binaries and not the > source, then you are "ok"... over in Maven Land we instituted a policy > that Category B licenses (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) as > dependencies in core had to be approved by a strict majority of the > PMC. Plugins published at Maven are allowed to add Category B licenses > without such approval, but we felt that core is too core. > > On 29 May 2012 15:00, dsh <[email protected]> wrote: >> To answer your question - I found this site [1]. Tho, don't know how >> authoritative it is. Concerning RAP - I mentioned it cause it provides >> a way to deal with UI programming in a more traditional way like you >> would do if using AWT/SWT/Swing or MFC... not sure whether we should >> consider it for the task at hand. Maybe at least probably not for the >> default implementation of a TomEE UI. Sorry if I distracted you with >> my comment about RAP :) >> >> [1] http://thewiki4opentech.org/index.php/Licenses_compatibility >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Are we going to have problems with the "Eclipse Public License" and the >>> "Apache Licence". I don't find a place stating they are compatible. >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html >>> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php >>> >>> []s, >>> Thiago. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:14 AM >>> Subject: Re: tomee webapp proposal >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> nop :p >>> >>> - Romain >>> >>> >>> 2012/5/29 dsh <[email protected]> >>> >>>> You are a troll again aren't you :D >>>> >>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > +1 for refrech button (wouldnt loose any resource for a refesh of the >>>> logs) >>>> > >>>> > eclipse eclipse...all modular apps are not eclipse like :p (i hope so at >>>> > least) >>>> > >>>> > - Romain >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> >>>> > >>>> >> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that >>> hangs >>>> >> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser >>>> should be >>>> >> able to handle it. >>>> >> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load >>> the >>>> >> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new >>>> interface >>>> >> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think? >>>> >> >>>> >> >> Eclipse RAP >>>> >> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely >>>> take a >>>> >> look. Thanks! >>>> >> >>>> >> Thiago. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <[email protected]> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the >>>> >> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting >>>> >> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the >>>> >> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would >>>> >> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does >>> such >>>> >> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery... >>>> >> > >>>> >> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse >>> perspective/view >>>> >> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an >>>> >> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI >>>> >> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :) >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Cheers >>>> >> > Daniel >>>> >> > >>>> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read >>>> the >>>> >> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O) >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating >>> in >>>> >> > > similar to digg.com? >>>> >> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have >>>> experience >>>> >> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this >>>> >> feature >>>> >> > > available at the server side. >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and >>>> two >>>> >> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices): >>>> >> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > What you guys think? >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > Thanks for the feedback! >>>> >> > > []s, >>>> >> > > Thiago. >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <[email protected] >>>> > >>>> >> > wrote: >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to >>>> >> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log >>>> >> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer >>> where >>>> >> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com? >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> Cheers >>>> >> > >> Daniel >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi < >>>> [email protected] >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >> wrote: >>>> >> > >> > Guys, >>>> >> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new >>>> webapp. >>>> >> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one >>>> which >>>> >> > will >>>> >> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and >>>> the >>>> >> > tomee >>>> >> > >> > log file. >>>> >> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it: >>>> >> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > What do you think? >>>> >> > >> > >>>> >> > >> > Thanks, >>>> >> > >> > Thiago. >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> >>>>
