My understanding is that if you depend on the binaries and not the source, then you are "ok"... over in Maven Land we instituted a policy that Category B licenses (http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html) as dependencies in core had to be approved by a strict majority of the PMC. Plugins published at Maven are allowed to add Category B licenses without such approval, but we felt that core is too core.
On 29 May 2012 15:00, dsh <[email protected]> wrote: > To answer your question - I found this site [1]. Tho, don't know how > authoritative it is. Concerning RAP - I mentioned it cause it provides > a way to deal with UI programming in a more traditional way like you > would do if using AWT/SWT/Swing or MFC... not sure whether we should > consider it for the task at hand. Maybe at least probably not for the > default implementation of a TomEE UI. Sorry if I distracted you with > my comment about RAP :) > > [1] http://thewiki4opentech.org/index.php/Licenses_compatibility > > Cheers > Daniel > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are we going to have problems with the "Eclipse Public License" and the >> "Apache Licence". I don't find a place stating they are compatible. >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html >> http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php >> >> []s, >> Thiago. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:14 AM >> Subject: Re: tomee webapp proposal >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> nop :p >> >> - Romain >> >> >> 2012/5/29 dsh <[email protected]> >> >>> You are a troll again aren't you :D >>> >>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > +1 for refrech button (wouldnt loose any resource for a refesh of the >>> logs) >>> > >>> > eclipse eclipse...all modular apps are not eclipse like :p (i hope so at >>> > least) >>> > >>> > - Romain >>> > >>> > >>> > 2012/5/29 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> >>> > >>> >> There is no secret with long-polling. It is just an ajax call that >> hangs >>> >> longer than the usual ones. Websockets are different: the browser >>> should be >>> >> able to handle it. >>> >> To make it simple we can just add a "refresh button", so we can load >> the >>> >> log with regular ajax calls. Once the first version of this new >>> interface >>> >> is done we can add the autorefresh functionality. What do you think? >>> >> >>> >> >> Eclipse RAP >>> >> First time a hear about it. It looks very cool!!! I will definitely >>> take a >>> >> look. Thanks! >>> >> >>> >> Thiago. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:40 AM, dsh <[email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Concerning long-polling (Comet, WebSockets etc. pp), depending on the >>> >> > framework you use the actual polling implementation is getting >>> >> > abstracted. So the user would get the impl depending on the >>> >> > capabilities provided by the browser and you on the other hand would >>> >> > not need to worrie about such technical details. I know Dojo does >> such >>> >> > abstraction... not sure about jQuery... >>> >> > >>> >> > PS: The Mockup reminds me very much about the Eclipse >> perspective/view >>> >> > concept. Probably using Eclipse RAP for the UI would be an >>> >> > overkill/unsuitable but there you would get such UI >>> >> > lay-outing/structuring mechanisms for free :) >>> >> > >>> >> > Cheers >>> >> > Daniel >>> >> > >>> >> > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > Yes, It makes more sense, otherwise it would be very hard to read >>> the >>> >> > > log... which doesn't make sense. :O) >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> Will it be a live log viewer where new log entries are floating >> in >>> >> > > similar to digg.com? >>> >> > > Yes. For that I plan to use long-polling (something I have >>> experience >>> >> > > with), but websockets are the perfect alternative if we have this >>> >> feature >>> >> > > available at the server side. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I created another mockup with a new position for the log panel and >>> two >>> >> > > extra panels (MDB and Webservices): >>> >> > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_v2.png >>> >> > > >>> >> > > What you guys think? >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Thanks for the feedback! >>> >> > > []s, >>> >> > > Thiago. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:27 AM, dsh <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > > >>> >> > >> One thought concerning the log view - maybe it would make sense to >>> >> > >> have it at the bottom where it could span the entire screen so log >>> >> > >> messages can be digested easier. Will it be a live log viewer >> where >>> >> > >> new log entries are floating in similar to digg.com? >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> Cheers >>> >> > >> Daniel >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Thiago Veronezi < >>> [email protected] >>> >> > >>> >> > >> wrote: >>> >> > >> > Guys, >>> >> > >> > I need your feedback about what I have in mind for the new >>> webapp. >>> >> > >> > Basically I want to replace all the pages we have by a new one >>> which >>> >> > will >>> >> > >> > give the user the access to a script console, the jndi tree and >>> the >>> >> > tomee >>> >> > >> > log file. >>> >> > >> > Please check the mockup I created for it: >>> >> > >> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1459144/tomee_webapp.png >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > What do you think? >>> >> > >> > >>> >> > >> > Thanks, >>> >> > >> > Thiago. >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>>
