Hi Sebastian, A). I use Win XP + FF 19.0 + flash 11.6.602.180. And Yulia have the same problems on W7 + GH + 11.6.602.171.
B). Crash happens when I am entering the room after I click "Start Conference" in the "Choose device" screen. C). Plugin crashes in the following way: I get "plugin-container.exe" application error window with the possibility to click OK to terminate and click CANCEL to debug. If I click OK I see a grey screen with the "Adobe Flash plugin crashed" message and the "Send report" button. I need to reload the page to continue work. D). It seems like it's not possible to attach files when you write to mailing list, so I'll will send you a screen shot personally. I've also found a way to catch a report which is sent if I click the "Send report" button - will send it to you too. E). Nothing special in the server log and browser console My additional notes: - Crash is reproducible if I run FireFox in safe mode. - Crash report reads: "Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE". I read in Internet that it can happen because of some video driver problems if hardware acceleration is turmed on, however I've just turned it off without improving - I've filed bug against Mozilla and send them some info and crash report - maybe they'll provide some advice - Setting dom.ipc.plugins.timeoutSecs to -1 in browser settings does not help (this is a timeout for the flash plugin response) For now maybe I can try some flash debagger to try to debug this. Best regards, Irina. On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:57 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the issue has been reviewed. > So we can be sure that the codec change in the codec is not an issue. > Maybe we can debug the crashes a bit more before we start the vote. > > @Irina Thanks for the Tests! > Can you please check those questions > A) What OS and flash player Version and browser was that? > B) When did the crash happen exactly? > C) Did the Plugin crash in terms of: > 1) showing a dialog that a script is slowing down? > 2) Browser replaces complete Flash Applet and shows message like "player > crashed" so that also you need to restart the Browser > 3) Player freezes and no more clicks possible? > D) Is there a screenshot from such a crash somewhere? > E) Is there something is the servers log when the crash happens? > > Did the crash happen always at a certain user action (B) might be the most > important question. > But it is also not clear to me yet what kind of crash we are talking about. > Flash Player crash can have so many different meanings. > > Thanks! > Sebastian > Am 14.03.2013 02:43 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>: > > > It seems like we have proof swf11+h264 not causing performance > degradation > > > > @Sebastian what do you think, is it time for RC2? > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Alexei Fedotov < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > >> Great job, Irina! > >> Thanks for digging this out. > >> -- > >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> http://dataved.ru/ > >> +7 916 562 8095 > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Irina Arkhipets > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > I investigated flash plugin crashes today and would like to share some > >> > results. > >> > > >> > First of all, crash happens both with SWF10 and SWF 11. It seems like > >> the > >> > problem is reproducible with H263, H264 1.2 and H264 5.1. > >> > > >> > Actually, I haven't noticed significant CPU usage degradation for H264 > >> in > >> > compare with H263 - it always was about 50-70% when I enter > OpenMeetings > >> > room. The same is true about the memory usage. > >> > > >> > I was able to get the crash report in Mozilla, however for now don't > see > >> > any info which can help me there. > >> > > >> > Tested environment was: Windows XP + Mozilla FireFox 19.0 + flash > player > >> > 11.5.502.146. Tested server was demo.dataved.ru, there were two users > >> with > >> > videos (1 with big window and the other with normal) in the room + me > >> with > >> > normal window. > >> > > >> > For now anybody can try different cases on > >> > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings and get own expression. > >> > > >> > Below are the links which can be tested and my today results for each > of > >> > them: > >> > > >> > - > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?swf=main.as3.swf10.swf&junk=666- > >> > SWF10 + H263. Crashed 3 times from 10. > >> > - > >> > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?swf=main.as3.swf11.h263.swf&junk=666- > >> > SWF11 + H263. Crashed 0 times from 10. > >> > - > >> > > >> > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?swf=main.as3.swf11.h264_1_2.swf&junk=666- > >> > SWF11 + H264 1.2. Crashed 2 times from 10. > >> > - > >> > > >> > http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?swf=main.as3.swf11.h264_5_1.swf&junk=666- > >> > SWF11 + H264 5/1/ Crashed 1 times from 10. > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Irina. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < > [email protected] > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> that is definitely something not readable :( > >> >> I can see the word "static" in the generated code :) this is global > >> >> variables :))) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:57 PM, [email protected] < > >> >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > just for consideration, > >> >> > attached is the current AS3 that OpenLaszlo generates. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/27836308/lzswf9.tar.gz > >> >> > > >> >> > Sebastian > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > 2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >> >> >> I thought maybe it will be simple to convert swf10 folder of our > >> sources > >> >> >> + I would like "someone else" will handle it :)))) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:38 PM, [email protected] < > >> >> >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> Sorry but that is useless. > >> >> >>> The AS3 code that OpenLaszlo compiles is not human readable. It > is > >> >> >>> generated into some tmp directory. > >> >> >>> You can search on your disc for a file called > LZC_COMPILER_OPTIONS > >> >> >>> That should be into the same directory as the actual AS3 files. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> The thing is that there are of course some high level > similarities. > >> >> >>> However there are also high level similarities between AS3 and > >> HTML5. > >> >> For > >> >> >>> example an ActionScript3 "Sprite" is nearly the same as an HTML > >> "div" > >> >> or > >> >> >>> maybe "span" but you can really translate those things just and > >> expect > >> >> the > >> >> >>> functionality is the same. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> The entire notation in MXML is different, same about the script > >> blogs. > >> >> >>> A script blog in openlaszlo looks like: > >> >> >>> var zxac = 3; > >> >> >>> in AS it would look like: > >> >> >>> var zxac:int = 3; > >> >> >>> No matter how you do it, you will have to go through every file, > >> debug > >> >> >>> every line of code, understand the logic, convert it to MXML, > test > >> it. > >> >> And > >> >> >>> some constructs of course won't translate that easy. > >> >> >>> For example in Flex you can't create that simple a "global" > >> pointer. > >> >> >>> Like: canvas.myattribute or parent.myattribute > >> >> >>> This simply won't compile. AS3 won't let you compile such > >> pointers. You > >> >> >>> need to pass the parameter into the object to access its > >> attributes, or > >> >> >>> pass the attribute inside of it. > >> >> >>> So a lot of the things we do when having some attribute in the > >> canvas > >> >> >>> and pointing to them from various places in the app ... it simply > >> >> doesn't > >> >> >>> work in MXML. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> So of course it depends on to what extend you plan to build a > Flex > >> >> >>> client. Maybe just the SWF11 app converting to MXML is an option. > >> But > >> >> the > >> >> >>> entire SWF8 app. I don't think so. Just too complex. > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Sebastian > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> 2013/3/13 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> The files appear in some temporary directory. I cannot remember > >> where > >> >> >>>> they are exactly. If you make an error when embedding action > >> script > >> >> >>>> into openlaszlo (should be something on action script level, xml > >> >> >>>> markup would break the preprocessor itself), you get in the > error > >> >> >>>> message an exact pointer to the file where your error is put. > >> >> >>>> -- > >> >> >>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> >> >>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> >> >>>> http://dataved.ru/ > >> >> >>>> +7 916 562 8095 > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > >> >> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> > @Alexey we currently using flex 4.5.0, 4.6.1 to create > bytecode > >> >> >>>> > "can be inspected/used" means autoconverted :) action script > >> instead > >> >> >>>> of > >> >> >>>> > openlaszlo is also good :) > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > can you please tell me how this can be inspected? > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > @Sebastian I thought we use only view/label/dataset/connection > >> in > >> >> our > >> >> >>>> swf10 > >> >> >>>> > code .... all these primitives should be available in MXML. > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Alexei Fedotov < > >> >> >>>> [email protected]> > >> >> >>>> > wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> @Max AS3 means action script > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> Modern OpenLaszlo compiles into AS3, these files can be > >> inspected > >> >> and > >> >> >>>> >> used instead of openlaszlo files. > >> >> >>>> >> Then standard Adobe tools create swf bytecode from AS3. > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> -- > >> >> >>>> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > >> >> >>>> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > >> >> >>>> >> http://dataved.ru/ > >> >> >>>> >> +7 916 562 8095 > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > >> >> >>>> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:18 AM, [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> > MXML has certainly advantages in the sense of wider > >> acceptance > >> >> and > >> >> >>>> >> > better > >> >> >>>> >> > development tools. > >> >> >>>> >> > But it really means to build something from scratch. > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > 2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> >> @Alexey we currently using openlaszlo for video (not sure > >> what > >> >> do > >> >> >>>> you > >> >> >>>> >> >> mean > >> >> >>>> >> >> by AS3). Currently our version of video components is > built > >> >> using > >> >> >>>> >> >> flex.4.6.1 while actual version available for download is > >> flex > >> >> >>>> 4.9.1. > >> >> >>>> >> >> I was hoping we will have less bugs and better performance > >> if we > >> >> >>>> will > >> >> >>>> >> >> use > >> >> >>>> >> >> MXML directly for our code. But this is just a guess. > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:00 PM, [email protected] < > >> >> >>>> >> >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> You can simply disable h264 and build to swf11. > >> >> >>>> >> >>> It is only about the codec not about SWF formats. > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> I just compared and could not really find out if there > are > >> big > >> >> >>>> >> >>> differences. > >> >> >>>> >> >>> However it is definitly good to really compare the > impacts > >> on > >> >> >>>> CPU and > >> >> >>>> >> >>> bandwidth usage when switching the Codec for video > >> encoding. > >> >> >>>> >> >>> It seemed to me like encoding with h264 is using a second > >> >> >>>> process (on > >> >> >>>> >> >>> OSX > >> >> >>>> >> >>> that process is called WindowsServer). It might be that > >> h264 > >> >> >>>> encoding > >> >> >>>> >> >>> can > >> >> >>>> >> >>> use some more system ressources. However... all just > >> guessing > >> >> at > >> >> >>>> this > >> >> >>>> >> >>> point. > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> 2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> Maybe we can add conversion task to the GSOC ideas? do > we > >> need > >> >> >>>> it? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> I don't see any problems with h264 > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> I'm going to build > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> 1) SWF11 with h264 support removed > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> 2) SWF11 with different h264 profile > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> 3) SWF10 > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> and compare > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> but i'm not expecting any major differences :( > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:17 PM, [email protected]< > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> No there is no such conversion. You have to rewrite the > >> LZX > >> >> to > >> >> >>>> MXML > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> and > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> AS3 files. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> What about the Video Codec? I don't think it makes > sense > >> to > >> >> >>>> start a > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> RC2 > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> vote before this issue has been further analyzed. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Is there a given restriction that needs h264? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> 2013/3/13 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> @Sebastian, maybe you know, is there any possibility > to > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> automatically/semi-automatically convert our swf10 > >> sources > >> >> to > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> "apache flex > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> xml"? Since Openlaszlo seems to be not actively > >> developed > >> >> and > >> >> >>>> flex > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> is now > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> part of Apache, maybe we can benefit from such > >> conversion? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> I have forwarded all missing messages > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:25 PM, > [email protected]< > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> you wrote me without CC'ing Irina or the list :) > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> I missed the 'reply all' button somehow. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> 2013/3/12 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> this one > >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-559 > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> @Irina can you describe your problem more detailed? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:46 PM, > >> [email protected] < > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> We should simply do some tests to measure the > actual > >> >> >>>> video with > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> h264 and the default Sorensen Codec. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then we have some numbers. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> What are the exact reports for "Flash Player > >> crashing" ? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/12 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I can add switching H264 off, but I'm not sure if > >> this > >> >> >>>> is the > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> problem. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Most claims are related to the crashing flash in > >> >> browser. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you think this would help? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:56 PM, > >> [email protected]< > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry I did not meant default h323 I meant the > >> default > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sorenson Spark > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorenson_Spark > >> >> >(Sorenson > >> >> >>>> H.263) > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/12 [email protected] < > >> >> [email protected]> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> h264 simply needs more computing time. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> AEC also is enabled (which needs some > percentages > >> >> more > >> >> >>>> CPU > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> power then the previous implementation). > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Switching to later Flex SDK is surely desirable > >> but > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> basically > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the performance is a Flash > Player/VirtualMachine > >> >> issue > >> >> >>>> not a > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Flash Compiler > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> issue. So as long as there is no Flash Player > 12 > >> that > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> requires a later Flex > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> SDK it is unlikely that you will gain > performance > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> advantages. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think there is a hardware acceleration for > >> playback > >> >> >>>> of > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> h264 > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> video, but I have really no idea about > producing > >> h264 > >> >> >>>> in the > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> browser in > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that context. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> From my point of view the main reason for using > >> h264 > >> >> >>>> is the > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> SIP > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> integration. For users that don't use SIP > >> integration > >> >> >>>> using > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> h264 will > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> simply just mean an annoying CPU usage. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The case is different for AEC from my point of > >> view. > >> >> >>>> AEC > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> brings > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> enhancement for everybody immediately. And the > >> more > >> >> of > >> >> >>>> CPU > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that it uses is > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> only 3-4 % from my point of view. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So my preference would be to make the video > >> codec use > >> >> >>>> the > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> standard h323. To be honest: Who has ever > >> complained > >> >> >>>> in the > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> last couple of > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> years about video quality? The discussion is > >> almost > >> >> >>>> always > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> about audio > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> delay, audio quality, micro echo, bad > >> microphones et > >> >> >>>> cetera > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> but actually > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> never about video quality. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And from what I have seen h264 also brings no > >> >> >>>> improvements > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> terms of bandwidth usage. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> h264 could be available via configuration (or > to > >> >> >>>> enable SIP > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> integration), but h323 should be used by > default. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/12 Maxim Solodovnik < > [email protected] > >> > > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Raju, Sebastian, > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-559 and > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> various user reports (including mail from > >> >> >>>> Sebastian[1]) > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Main code changes were: adding > >> EnchancedMicrophone > >> >> and > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> switch > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to h264 > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the Google switching to h264 can > >> cause > >> >> >>>> higher > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CPU > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> usage. > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can this be fixed by changing H264Level? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (currently H264Level.LEVEL_1_2 is used) > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you can us understand were > >> >> performance/stability > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> degradation caused by code changes? Or maybe > it > >> is > >> >> >>>> because > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Flex4.6.0? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can stability be improved by switching to > >> Flex4.9.1? > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for your help > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >> http://markmail.org/message/2el63qarsjmbvfyy > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > http://markmail.org/message/2el63qarsjmbvfyy > >> >-- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >>> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> >>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> >>> [email protected] > >> >> >>>> >> >>> > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> >> -- > >> >> >>>> >> >> WBR > >> >> >>>> >> >> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> >> >> > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> >>>> >> > -- > >> >> >>>> >> > Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>>> >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>>> >> > http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>>> >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>>> >> > [email protected] > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > -- > >> >> >>>> > WBR > >> >> >>>> > Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> -- > >> >> >>> Sebastian Wagner > >> >> >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> >>> http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> >>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> >>> [email protected] > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> WBR > >> >> >> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Sebastian Wagner > >> >> > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> >> > http://www.webbase-design.de > >> >> > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com > >> >> > [email protected] > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> WBR > >> >> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > >
