Why would we change cohorts to use uuids rather than patient ids? The idea
is that patient_id is valid for use within the database. Is there a
sync-related issue? Or are you trying to export these?

-Darius

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Dave Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:

> While we're at it, can we change cohorts to use uuids rather than patient
> ids too?
> On Sep 16, 2011 5:56 PM, "Friedman, Roger (CDC/CGH/DGHA) (CTR)" <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > The original proposal was to replace the autogenerated id with the UUID
> as the Hibernate identity field. Was that not implemented?
> >
> > Some of the linking tables had no ID or UUID, using the from/to unique
> ids as the unique id (between location and location tag, if I remember
> correctly, is one). Has that been changed?
> >
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darius
> Jazayeri
> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 11:20 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] TRUNK-2362 - Get rid of implementations of
> equals and hashCode in our domain objects
> >
> >
> > Roger,
> >
> > This only affects equality and hash set membership tests in java. It will
> be dwarfed by the cost of pulling things from the database, from a
> performance standpoint.
> >
> > -Darius (by phone)
> > On Sep 16, 2011 7:14 AM, "Friedman, Roger (CDC/CGH/DGHA) (CTR)" <
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > Greg --
> > You don't have to break everything to be famous, all you have to do is
> slow things down a lot. The article that is at the root of this issue
> rejected UUIDs because comparisons are slow due to their length. Could you
> try some operations with your fix and the large DB and compare performance?
> > Saludos, Roger
> >
> > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Greg Warren
>
> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 1:06 AM
> > To: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> > Subject: [OPENMRS-DEV] TRUNK-2362 - Get rid of implementations of equals
> and hashCode in our domain objects
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I am going to check in this fix which affects almost all the domain
> objects. We have removed t...
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Click here to 
> > unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>
> from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
> >
> > _________________________________________
> >
> > To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to
> [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body
> (not the subject) of your e-mail.
> >
> > [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
> ------------------------------
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to