We've had a research dataset get mangled recently by being extracted from
our parent server originally, and then updated from our reporting server.
This set anne back by a week or so of trying to figure out why data quality
had just taken a major nosedive.  The reason was that person_id is displaced
by one between the servers.  its not that important, really, but if we're
REALLY moving toward uuids defining identity, this would be a way to make a
globally true set of patients.
 On Sep 20, 2011 1:39 AM, "Darius Jazayeri" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why would we change cohorts to use uuids rather than patient ids? The idea
> is that patient_id is valid for use within the database. Is there a
> sync-related issue? Or are you trying to export these?
>
> -Darius
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Dave Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> While we're at it, can we change cohorts to use uuids rather than patient
>> ids too?
>> On Sep 16, 2011 5:56 PM, "Friedman, Roger (CDC/CGH/DGHA) (CTR)" <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > The original proposal was to replace the autogenerated id with the UUID
>> as the Hibernate identity field. Was that not implemented?
>> >
>> > Some of the linking tables had no ID or UUID, using the from/to unique
>> ids as the unique id (between location and location tag, if I remember
>> correctly, is one). Has that been changed?
>> >
>> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darius
>> Jazayeri
>> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 11:20 AM
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] TRUNK-2362 - Get rid of implementations of
>> equals and hashCode in our domain objects
>> >
>> >
>> > Roger,
>> >
>> > This only affects equality and hash set membership tests in java. It
will
>> be dwarfed by the cost of pulling things from the database, from a
>> performance standpoint.
>> >
>> > -Darius (by phone)
>> > On Sep 16, 2011 7:14 AM, "Friedman, Roger (CDC/CGH/DGHA) (CTR)" <
>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> > Greg --
>> > You don't have to break everything to be famous, all you have to do is
>> slow things down a lot. The article that is at the root of this issue
>> rejected UUIDs because comparisons are slow due to their length. Could
you
>> try some operations with your fix and the large DB and compare
performance?
>> > Saludos, Roger
>> >
>> > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Greg Warren
>>
>> > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 1:06 AM
>> > To: [email protected]<mailto:
>> [email protected]>
>>
>> > Subject: [OPENMRS-DEV] TRUNK-2362 - Get rid of implementations of
equals
>> and hashCode in our domain objects
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I am going to check in this fix which affects almost all the domain
>> objects. We have removed t...
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Click here to unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]
?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>
>> from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>> >
>> > _________________________________________
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to
>> [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body
>> (not the subject) of your e-mail.
>> >
>> > [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
>> ------------------------------
>> Click here to unsubscribe<
[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from OpenMRS
Developers' mailing list
>>
>
> _________________________________________
>
> To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not
the subject) of your e-mail.
>
> [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to