On 6 April 2013 13:37, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 5:51 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Now that our wiki (mwiki) runs smoothly and performs quite well, it is > > slowly time to take a look at our other services. > > > > In order to determine what should/can be done, I need some figures. > > > > Can anybody help me with traffic figures for > > wiki.o.o, forum.o.o (total for the vm not per language) and www.o.o > > > > Does end-users download directly from www.o.o or from a secondary site ? > > > > I need the following numbers (if possible): > > - daily number of clicks (average) > > - peak number of clicks within a short period like 1 hour > > > > > > From Google Analytics we have: > > For wiki: around 33K page views/day > > For forums, I have no idea. They are using a Google Analytics account ( > UA-1087265-8) that is not connected with the rest of the website. If that > could be updated to match the rest of the website we'd have typical numbers > in a week. >
Thanks for your answers, but I am a bit scared you (as a PMC) tell me "they" use an account unknown to us. Who has the forum account ? I have the technical power to change it (sudo access) but if a PMC tell we do no know who owns it, it would not be right just to change it. Who but the "owner" can authorize a change ? I trust this is a misunderstanding somewhere, it cannot be that we run a service, that we do not control, in the sense of change management. > For the website as a whole (all subdomains tracked) it is around 730K/day > for a peak day. If you subtract out the forum traffic and the downloads > (which serviced by SourceForge) then the static website is probably more > like 600K/day visits. > Why do I need to subtract forum, I thought they ran as a separate dns ? do we not count on basis of our template (that loads the GA account). > > So that indirectly answers your other question -- the big download files > are from the SourceForge distribution network. But we do have smaller > downloads, of documentation PDF's. These are mainly from the wiki. > > In terms of peaks, our biggest day usually Wednesday, lowest on Sunday. > The variation there around 200K/visits. > Super just what I need. > > Hourly peak is around 15K visits for all tracked subdomains together. > Do you know the division between mwiki, forum and www ? > > Note: for all of these I'm talking about "pages", where a single page > could include several HTTP calls, for the HTML, the Javascript, images, > etc. Since anyone with Javascript not enabled would not register, the > actual numbers are probably a little bit higher than this. > Good point, that is very important for a a traffic server, where e.g. javascripts would be cached. I am trying to convince Infra, that we should have a common trafficserver for wiki and forum (and maybe www). Currently we use eresbus as proxy, and all packets are forwarded to the ooo-wiki2-vm where that trafficserver filters cached pages. Forum goes direct to httpd, so every packet causes mysql activity. If we had a trafficserver in eresbus, we would for wiki2 save loads of network traffic and for forum network traffic as well as mysql activity. > > In any case, one approach would be to enable GA for the Forums, track that > for a week or two and then compare that to the Wiki numbers. If the stacks > are similar, then we could think of the traffic ratio between the two and > tune based on that. > I agree, but not being PMC, I do not feel I am in the position to "just" make that change. Who "owns" the forum, they should authorize such a change. I can make the change (provided you tell give me the GA line to insert) when I am sure I am not doing a change that someone else depend on. > > > > I would like to tune at least forum before we release 4.0 to prepare for > a > > higher load. Tuning of www depend on a discussion with infra, because it > is > > a shared service. > > > > > If it is like the release of 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 we'll get a few hot pages: > > 1) The announcement blog post. With both 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 releases these > were heavily linked to by the press. Roller went down in the 3.4.1 case. > I don't know if that was due to the traffic or not. But we might want to > plan on having the announcement post be a static webpage just to be sure. > The blog post is on the general apache server and not our www, is that correct ? > > 2) The homepage and http://www.openoffice.org/download page will be hot. > You can see from the download chart the boost we get when a new release > occurs: http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html (AOO 3.4.0 was > May > 8th 2012 and AOO 3.4.1 was Aug 23rd). > That is a real obvious case for trafficserver, and until it is in place I can ask to have the httpd use memcached (which it might be already). Currently the www is on a general apache server, so I need strong arguments to make changes (high load is a strong argument) > > > > > > Translate-vm also needs tunings, but that is in progress, and infra has > > been very kind and prepared an extra vm, so we/I install/tune without > > affecting the active system. > > > > thx in advance for figures. > > rgds > > jan I. > THANKS a lot for your answer, which help me a lot doing calc.. Sorry for being frank about the forum, but it really make me nervous that we have a service where part it unknown. rgds Jan I > > >
