On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Emanuele <emanuel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As asked by Kay, here it is a new thread. > > Unfortunately I didn't have much time to volunteer to this (and I'm not > sure in the next period either. > Anyway, if you see anything you want from what I did, feel free to pick > it (I suppose I can write here it is released under AL2 license and > everything should be fine). > > That said, > Thanks for the new thread and for the interesting new design. Given discussions about the website home page just form today, you can see there is considerable interest in improving our landing page. Your design incorporates some much needed creative elements! Whenever you can communicate again is just fine. Looking forward to more of your communication and ideas. > Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > Am 07/02/2014 09:41 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >> Marcus (OOo) wrote: > >>> Am 07/02/2014 07:50 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >>>> http://getbootstrap.com/css/#buttons I'm not really sure, maybe it > >>>> will > >>>> look very bad, but maybe there are some elements can we can work with. > >>> > >>> Maybe good or bad. But it's definitely a step back as the buttons are > >>> just colored but now we have a graphic. This would be gone which is, > >>> hm, > >>> not good looking... ;-) > >> > >> In the buttons of course one could reuse all the graphics, but still use > >> Bootstrap buttons for the shape and to highlight the "active" choice. > > If the idea is to use bootstrap it may be worth re-adapt the entire HTML > according to the "bootstrap way". > It will be a pain at the beginning (it basically means rewrite a lot of > stuff), but I suppose it would be an advantage in the mid/long term. > > For example, another thing I was considering is the separation of the > menu and the breadcrumbs with a menu fixed-top and the breadcrumbs where > the are now: > http://testing.elkarte.it/testing/ooo/index_fix.html > > > ah, yes, that would work. > > > >> The current divs do not look bad (actually, they look nice!) on the > >> current homepage, while they don't fit well in the new proposal; > > It would be nice to know "why". ;) (Of course just because if you tell > me the "why" I may try to understand how to fix it.) > The very first time the hovers were a bit random (they didn't always > reach the bottom border), in the "second version" they are more > consistent (except the last two because the underline is not on the > <li>, but on the <ul>, but that's a detail that can be fixed), if it is > what you mean. > > > Kay Schenk wrote: > > The "template" pieces are currently in the /lib and /templates directory > of > > the ooo-site tree. > > Are the css "compiled" somehow as well, or are they in the home.css, > ooo.css, etc. files? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "To be trusted is a greater compliment than being loved." -- George MacDonald
