On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 19:50:58 +0200 Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 09/24/2014 01:37 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > > > If he makes zero useful posts, just ban him and get rid of the problem. > > Sure he can register with a new address, and this is why Michael is > > correct in saying that people should really learn to ignore posts and > > not having public discussions on whether to ban him. But banning him > > will show that you are all on the same side. > > +1 > > The worst thing that you can do (in this case) is doing nothing. So, > even when banning is not the best/savest solution, it indeed will tell > him: You are taking care and watching him. > > Marcus I agree. Better to ban him, even if he later reappears under a different name. At least such different name will not have the gravitas of so many postings, which gravitas may lead readers to suppose his advice is sound. -- Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
