Hello Marcus, the new Google+ design is criticised by a lot of users and is giving me a hard time to adapt all the logos/graphics. It is now similar to the phone/tablet layout...
About your thoughts concerning the size of the favicon.ico: I reworked it. It now contains 16x16, 32x32, 48x48 and 64x64. Every browser should be happy with that and the size shrunk to 32k. Can you live with that? ;-) regards, Matthias Am 05.12.2016 um 12:29 schrieb Marcus: > Am 12/03/2016 12:18 AM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> I did all changes now... It could take some time to be visible. >> >> If you go to: >> >> https://plus.google.com/+openoffice >> >> there is a a link to our homepage underneath the logo. Behind the link >> there is a check mark. If you point the mouse on it it says "Verknüpfte >> Website". This is only to ensure that this website really belongs to the >> profile. >> >> But wait! It can be, that you see the "new" design from Google+. So it >> may be not visible for you. >> In my eyes the new design is quite ugly and not ready for release. But >> Google thinks it should be default... :-O >> >> Hard to explain, here is a picture (classical Google+): >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48386075/Google%2Bverification.png > > thanks for the screenshot. Than it makes sense. As you thought already > I see a different webpage style. > > Marcus > > > >> Am 02.12.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 12/02/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>> Am 02.12.2016 um 19:59 schrieb Marcus: >>>>> Am 12/02/2016 06:44 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>> Am 02.12.2016 um 17:42 schrieb Marcus: >>>>>>> Am 12/02/2016 01:11 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>> Last night I did some changes to our homepage... ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks for your update. I've some questions: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Renewed the google-site-verification. Now we have a >>>>>>>> confirmed >>>>>>>> link to >>>>>>>> https://www.openoffice.org on Google+ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the reason to exchange the old one? Got it invalid? >>>>>> >>>>>> No, the old one was for http, now the link is for https. Google >>>>>> needed a >>>>>> new verification code for that. >>>>>> Originally this was done by Rob Weir (?), so I just changed the >>>>>> string >>>>>> in index.html. >>>>> >>>>> OK, but what is now with HTTP? Isn't it then needed to have 2 codes? >>>>> Or does the code for HTTPS include HTTP automatically? >>>> >>>> Yes. It is just to verify the quality of the link (See the checkmark >>>> behind the link on Google+) >>> >>> sorry, I'm not familar with G+. Wich checkmark do you mean? >>> >>>>>>>> - Added favicon.png (Which now seems unnecessary, but doesn't >>>>>>>> hurt >>>>>>>> either) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is already one. Please see ".../branding/images/favicon.ico". >>>>>>> So, please don't put other files into the root directory except >>>>>>> dirs >>>>>>> and HTML files. It's already enough filled with things that do not >>>>>>> belong there. ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Nice to have a favicon in a subfolder, when it is not referenced in >>>>>> html. It will never be used! ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Browsers look by default in the root for favicon.ico. There was >>>>>> already >>>>>> one since 2014. It was 100k, the new one is 99k. >>>>>> But we can surely move the favicon.ico and change the link >>>>>> accordingly. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, please. >>>> >>>> OK, I will move it to /branding/images. What to do with the old unused >>>> icon? Can I rename it? >>> >>> "favicon_16x16.ico" looks like a good name for the backup. >>> >>>> And I will delete favicon.png. Hopefully everything will work without >>>> it... >>> >>> No risk, no fun ... ;-) >>> >>>>>>>> - Added a link to favicon.ico and favicon.png to get a >>>>>>>> thumbnail >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> the link to our homepage on YouTube >>>>>>>> - Increased the size of the orb in favicon.ico, so it >>>>>>>> looks much >>>>>>>> clearer now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From 1kB to 100kB is IMHO not really an improvement. >>>>>>> Compared with >>>>>>> some Youtube visitors, this will increase the loading time of every >>>>>>> webpage request. >>>>>> >>>>>> As I said before, that 1k favicon.ico wasn't used. Who ever put it >>>>>> there... >>>>>> >>>>>> But I think we can delete favicon.png. That was just a fallback. >>>>>> Eventually Google only needed some time to crawl the webpage. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where can I see the icon in the Youtube channel [1]? When checking >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> graphic links nothing refers back to get them from our webpage. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are four links at the right side of the channel graphic. >>>>>> Homepage >>>>>> is the first and had a generic icon until recently. >>>>>> >>>>>> The icons are automatically pulled, when YouTube (Google) checks the >>>>>> link. That did work for Facebook, Twitter and Google+, but not >>>>>> for our >>>>>> homepage. >>>>> >>>>> So, that means Youtube goes to "www.openoffice.org", looks in >>>>> "index.html" for an favicon entry and if existing take it from the >>>>> given path? >>>> >>>> Right. Google pulls only the proper resolution. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> If you can't see the AOO orb in front of the link now, you may >>>>>> have to >>>>>> empty your browser cache and reload the page. >>>>> >>>>> Sure, I can see it. But I don't see an increase of quality. It's the >>>>> same size as on our homepage. So, why is there a new and bigger >>>>> favicon needed? >>>> >>>> Until recently, you couldn't even see the icon... >>>> >>>> It contains graphics for different resolutions like before. >>>> Therefore it >>>> is bigger, but more versatile than a small 16x16 icon. >>>> We live in the times of HiDPI- and Retina-Displays! >>>> And the one I adapted has been there since 2014 (file date). The >>>> size of >>>> the new file is even slightly smaller now. >>>> >>>> Let me clarify, the dimensions are the same, only it uses the >>>> available >>>> space better and looks "bigger". >>>> >>>> I think you can see the difference here: >>>> >>>> old: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48386075/favicon_old.png >>>> new: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/48386075/favicon.png >>> >>> It's indeed looking bigger - or better said it's filling the complete >>> available space. >>> >>> Again, thanks for the updates. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> BTW, in the near future Google (Chrome) plans to mark all websites >>>>>>>> without https as "unsafe". >>>>>>>> We already have a certificate for our homepage, do we want to make >>>>>>>> https >>>>>>>> as default? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (Some pages have problems >>>>>>>> (https://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html) so that must be >>>>>>>> investigated in advance) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hm, I don't see a problem here. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can see the text, but not the graphics, because they are loaded >>>>>> from >>>>>> an "unsafe place" (Firefox, Chrome and IE block this by default) >>>>>> This is only a problem, if we set https as default. Now the page is >>>>>> loaded with http. You need to use the above link to see it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for taking care. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5VAaY4mqQVhNe8j7fZCEfw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>> >>>>>> That is just eye candy for our visitors... ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, Matthias >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 01.12.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Marcus: >>>>>>>>> Am 12/01/2016 12:21 AM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >>>>>>>>>> I did it already, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Upload via CMS is OK, download works via SVN. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> great, thanks. :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 01.12.2016 um 00:02 schrieb Marcus: >>>>>>>>>>> Am 11/30/2016 11:42 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the CMS treats it as a text/html file. >>>>>>>>>>>>> GIMP can not open it when downloaded. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The XCF Marcus uploaded to SVN is usable. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Download it from here: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (use right-click on the file name to be sure the browser >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>> mess >>>>>>>>>>>> with it) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> should I update the file property via SVN? If so whats the SVN >>>>>>>>>>> command >>>>>>>>>>> to use? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Marcus > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
