Le Vendredi 28 Juillet 2006 21:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Hi, Hi,
> I don´t think it is sucessful within the coding and working together > process for an addon. I do not only want a simple "put the cspace-exe on > the OO-CdRom". I don´t know if for a working functionality the OO-Core has > to be touched. I just want the CSapce Messenger in the installer of open > office and then users can use it. That would be a kind of bundle... First, please notice that OOo project has little control over the contents of the Linux distributions' packages, so they could un-bundle that easily ;-). So your bundling project would, from a practical point of view; apply only to Windows users. > Therefor the CSpace messenger just needs > the OO-Logo of Cspace added, as i mailed. What's the point of bundling two applications together if they do not integrate? You skipped the first part of my message, where I asked you to describe the benefits of launchers. I would still appreciate if you could detail that, and not logos stuff. > On the website then it should get > an own tab, so that it is announced as the 7th. Component of the suite. How > it is then technically integrated, in the installer or into the core or ad > an distributed addon is a technical question i cannot answer, this is why > we discuss it here. You are starting with the cosmetical / marketing side of it. It has to make sense technically first. We are not writing proprietary software and as such we do not put the commercial buzz before the real interest. > I just want to define with you the process for the user. > > - sufring the website of OO, consoderugn that there are 7 components, one > is the messenger - downloading the ISO CDROM or Installer Exe of OOO > - installing all and getting the OO-Messenger Icon on the desktop as well > as all other 6 components - launching the Messenger, the look and feel gui > of the Messenger is nearly the other gui of the calc component or writer > component, so IMHO jsut a gui icon adding... Common look and feel is no real integration. > That´s all, OK. Then that makes no difference with an external independant program. If there is no more integration than that, for me it's a simple "no". > I do not need to lauch the Messenger out of the calculator from > word... I just want to have a desktop icon the the OhOh-Seven Messenger > CSpace after the OO-Installation. > > Think it is not so much work to get a working isntallation around and a > website with a description of the 7th component and third, a look and feel > OO gui for CSpace. > > And the main project line is, that I think today office and enduser desktop > applications need a Messenger for Comminication. That´s all. And with the > fact, that there is not still a MAC version out.. I think we can live for > the first year. Why has it to be bundled together if it works exactly the same as separately? > The initially launch for that component in windows will immediately fidn > coders to help for a mac version... if this is not even coming from the > cspace decelopment itself. > > The Messenger is good and jsut 9 day out !! Worldwide the first and modern > technology of kademlia dht. > > Open office would be ahead ! Not really. Don't take it bad, Thomas. I'm sure there must be real interest with some IM integration, but not like that. -- Les enfants, selon l'Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'enfance (Unicef), constituent près d'un tiers des victimes - morts et blessées - des bombardements [israéliens]. Ils représentent entre 45% et 50% des désormais plus de 500 000 personnes déplacées. [Le Monde, 24 juillet, Correspondante à Beyrouth] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
