Sorry about that. I was going trough the steps but I have left steps for signing artifacts and uploading them at the end.
When for all 3 repos I had build, comparison and sign in works I tried upload it using provided instructions. If you are not seeing any suspicious in that log I need to understand more why actually upload wasn't triggered. Artifacts were definitely generated correctly. Thanks, Piotr On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 5:33 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > I'm not sure what warnings you are referring to. > > If you look at releasesteps.xml, you can see that it is using Maven's > wagon:upload goal to upload from a particular folder. Are there jars in > that folder (or its subfolders)? Examine the output of the previous Ant > release steps for step 003 to see if the source package built correctly and > binary matched. If the previous steps were successful then the upload > should be picking up those artifacts. > > I'm a bit confused that you got to step 11 according to email but now are > saying you never got past step 3. > > Also, I do not recommend using a temporary folder inside your working > copy. It will be far safer to specify an absolute path to a folder outside > of your working copy. Find a good place to add that to the wiki > instructions. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 8/13/19, 2:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for information. I went today trough the steps again. I reached > point where I'm trying to upload artifacts, but script keep saying me > that > there is nothing to upload. Is it because of those warnings at the > beginnings ? [1] > > [1] > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fzvxoi&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=tmu1%2ByeQjPG9mTY%2BnvW6S%2BtLFhFfdAinLqnxLgReKZE%3D&reserved=0 > > Thanks, > Piotr > > pon., 12 sie 2019 o 19:31 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > napisał(a): > > > Getting back to this. > > > > You can start a vote on the results. If we get this process > working, it > > should be relatively easy for others to do releases as well so we > will > > hopefully do releases more often and it won't matter if someone's > recent > > changes made it into the RC or not. > > > > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being > created > > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and ask the > RM to > > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the develop > > branch. > > > > The only build output I could find on the server for the 7/24 both > show > > that the date/time given back in step 009 was invalid. As you can > see from > > the exception, Java is parsing the string and the expectation is > that the > > string you enter conforms to the Java format of: > > > > MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z > > > > The documentation for this format is in the Java documentation. As I > > explained in an earlier reply, "Z" stands for timezone and you must > supply > > one. It shouldn't matter which one you supply, I use the one I'm > in, but > > again, the whole point of this exercise is to find bugs and improve > > documentation of the process. In your most recent attempt, you did > not > > specify a timezone. In the one prior, you did not supply a year or > a space > > between date and hour. Please update the documentation or the > instructions > > in the Jenkins jobs to make it more clear that you have to be > accurate in > > specifying the date. > > > > HTH, > > -Alex > > > > On 7/24/19, 9:01 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Btw. Once I finish steps - Can I publish artefacts and start RC1 > vote > > on > > dev ? Does anything I should know at the end which is not > mention ? > > > > > > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:59 Piotr Zarzycki < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > napisał(a): > > > > > By compare to dypedefs step - do you mean that I should look > into > > Jenkins > > > configuration of that steps or something else ? > > > > > > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:56 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > napisał(a): > > > > > >> Hi Piotr, > > >> > > >> You can compare the output from previous builds and also the > > typedefs > > >> build configuration because both successfully used the date > > format. The > > >> Java documentation says that "Z" is for timezone. It > shouldn't > > matter > > >> which one you use, but in the typedefs you hadn't specified > one at > > all. > > >> > > >> It looks like in this case extra quotes are wrapped around > the date. > > >> You'll have to compare against the typedefs steps to see why > that's > > >> happening. > > >> > > >> HTH, > > >> -Alex > > >> > > >> On 7/24/19, 3:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi Alex, > > >> > > >> I was able to overcome issue with date for typedefs. > Instruction > > >> there is > > >> saying: > > >> > > >> MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z > > >> > Where MM/dd/yy is the US-formatted date and HH:MM is a > faked > > time to > > >> > encode the release version such as: > > >> > 2/10/19 9:06 -0800 > > >> > > >> > > >> I have typed 7/24/2019 HH (I don't remember what was > that) and > > -0800 > > >> - This > > >> part I completely do not understand - what is for there > minus ? > > Can > > >> you > > >> send exact example of what I should put there ? > > >> > > >> What's more I have went trough forward and in steps > related to > > >> royale-asjs > > >> I see that typing either > > >> > > >> 7/24/19 9:06 -0800 or just 7/24/19 9:06 causes an > exception > > with > > >> following > > >> message: > > >> > > >> > > >> [INFO] COMPC > > >> [INFO] Loading configuration: > > >> > > >> > > > C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_011\target\checkout\frameworks\themes\Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Yellow-Theme\target\compile-swf-config.xml > > >> [INFO] > > >> [INFO] java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date: > ""7/24/19 > > 9:06"" > > >> [INFO] at > java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366) > > >> [INFO] at > > >> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.processFileEntry(SWCTarget.java:330) > > >> [INFO] at > > >> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.addFileEntriesToSWC(SWCTarget.java:291) > > >> > > >> It looks like there are some additional parentheses - > Maybe > > it's an > > >> issue. > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Piotr > > >> > > >> > > >> wt., 23 lip 2019 o 18:56 Alex Harui > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> napisał(a): > > >> > > >> > Hi Piotr, > > >> > > > >> > What differences did you see? I downloaded the two > SWCs and > > the > > >> only > > >> > difference I saw was the timestamps in the catalog.xml > in the > > SWCs. > > >> > > > >> > The timestamps are set by the SWCDATE parameter in Step > 005. > > The > > >> log > > >> > indicates that you did not specify a timezone so maybe > that's > > why > > >> the > > >> > timestamps are not matching up. Please update the > > instructions so > > >> that > > >> > future RMs do not forget to include a timezone. The > example > > >> pattern that > > >> > Jenkins should show should include a timezone. > > >> > > > >> > You will have to remove the tag and revert any commits > from > > steps > > >> 5, 6, > > >> > and 7 before re-running step 5. > > >> > > > >> > HTH, > > >> > -Alex > > >> > > > >> > On 7/23/19, 6:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > >> > Thanks! I have moved forward and in step 7 - > related to > > >> typedefs during > > >> > build on my local machine I got mismatch error [1]. > What > > could > > >> actually > > >> > happen? I did compare some files inside those two > swc and > > they > > >> are > > >> > indeed > > >> > different - I have used Total Command to compare > them. > > >> > > > >> > When I'm starting steps related to typedefs - first > step > > >> actually > > >> > checkout > > >> > fresh sources ? I'm wondering whether Jenkins > checkout > > them > > >> earlier > > >> > when I > > >> > started one of the step before typedefs steps? This > those > > 2 > > >> files [2] > > >> > > > >> > [1] > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbren2&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=88f%2BAPgrIuwRMwmr1UUQt33wGFiJtLu3UE0q1i68Xqo%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > [2] > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2icJBcCsTMZrzfnTTuQ%3Fe%3DNwidMg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=gIol71USgDvSkHeLWnnfLDtEIcol3npGD67G7rc3PXA%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Piotr > > >> > > > >> > wt., 23 lip 2019 o 07:31 Alex Harui > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> > napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Piotr, > > >> > > > > >> > > The email with the subject "Release Step 003 > Succeeded" > > says: > > >> > > > > >> > > 1. If you are releasing the utils jars > > (compiler-jburg-types > > >> and > > >> > > compiler-build-tools), Run: > > >> > > ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003 > -Dutils=true > > >> > > -Drelease.version=0.9.6 > > >> > > > > >> > > It looks like you are not using the -Dutils=true. > > Please > > >> improve the > > >> > > email so future RMs will not miss that parameter. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > -Alex > > >> > > > > >> > > On 7/22/19, 9:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > >> > > I have made adjustment to documentation. I'm > on > > step 3 > > >> where I > > >> > need > > >> > > build > > >> > > on my end sources. I have run on my PC this: > > >> > > > > >> > > ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003 > > >> -Drelease.version=0.9.6 > > >> > > > > >> > > It downloads sources and maven artifacts, but > it > > also > > >> tried > > >> > build them > > >> > > automatically as I understa. I got error [1] > - it > > >> understandable > > >> > cause > > >> > > there is no 1.0.0 compiler-jburg-types. > Should I on > > my > > >> own build > > >> > > first compiler-jburg-types with 1.0.0 to have > stuff > > in > > >> local > > >> > cache or > > >> > > should I made something else ? > > >> > > > > >> > > [1] > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fa10nq&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=7Ukn17JhXzjRDCLaq2NuC2WjfKTfd61G07BxwERKg44%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > >> > > Piotr > > >> > > > > >> > > sob., 20 lip 2019 o 06:25 Alex Harui > > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> > > napisał(a): > > >> > > > > >> > > > Please update the wiki in a way that the > next > > person > > >> will know > > >> > which > > >> > > 2FA > > >> > > > token to use. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > -Alex > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On 7/19/19, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" < > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > So far so good. I'm on a step 3, where > I need > > build > > >> > artifacts on > > >> > > my > > >> > > > sight > > >> > > > and compare them with what Jenkins > produce. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I will get back to that probably on > Monday. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 1:40 PM Piotr > Zarzycki < > > >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks it's working. I'm moving > forward > > with that > > >> stuff > > >> > let's > > >> > > see > > >> > > > how far > > >> > > > > I go with it. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Piotr > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > pt., 19 lip 2019 o 05:49 Alex Harui > > >> > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> > > > napisał(a): > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> I am using the token generated this > way: > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Fen%2Farticles%2Fcreating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-command-line&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=fXr%2FWNXLj16dGgQYs2iV9BqDlUCwHit3KL%2By31jyT7s%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> There is no short code from Google > > Authenticator. > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> -Alex > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> On 7/18/19, 8:46 AM, "Piotr > Zarzycki" < > > >> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> I'm using 2FA authentication, > second > > step > > >> for me is > > >> > typing > > >> > > > short code > > >> > > > >> from > > >> > > > >> Google Authenticator > application. Do > > you use > > >> > something > > >> > > > different? > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o 17:42 Alex > Harui > > >> > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> > > > >> napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > I don't think git version > matters. > > Are you > > >> using > > >> > your > > >> > > 2fa > > >> > > > token as > > >> > > > >> the > > >> > > > >> > password? It should be a > really long > > >> sequence of > > >> > > characters. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Get Outlook for Android< > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=%2Fs0HIUPTze0OyuNrJjI0Qzceym5imZbiHl4q4GJ40Ng%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ________________________________ > > >> > > > >> > From: Piotr Zarzycki < > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 > > 7:43:44 AM > > >> > > > >> > To: dev@royale.apache.org > > >> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Discuss of > release steps > > >> preparation > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Maybe Git just should be > updated on > > >> Machine ? I > > >> > see > > >> > > 2.15 and > > >> > > > there > > >> > > > >> is 2.22 > > >> > > > >> > already. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > czw., 18 lip 2019 o 16:35 Piotr > > Zarzycki < > > >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > When I do git push - I'm > getting > > separate > > >> > window with > > >> > > title > > >> > > > >> GitHub Login > > >> > > > >> > - > > >> > > > >> > > where I can enter my > > login/password. I'm > > >> doing > > >> > that > > >> > > and in > > >> > > > the > > >> > > > >> next step > > >> > > > >> > it > > >> > > > >> > > throws me an error in the > console > > - same > > >> what I > > >> > have > > >> > > pasted > > >> > > > in > > >> > > > >> previous > > >> > > > >> > > email. > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > I'm typing again login and > password > > >> cause It's > > >> > asking > > >> > > me as > > >> > > > you > > >> > > > >> can see > > >> > > > >> > in > > >> > > > >> > > the previous email. In the > results > > I get: > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > remote: Invalid username or > > password. > > >> > > > >> > > fatal: Authentication failed > for ' > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=ipeFBevuYmFkR%2B%2FX7WswqgufUEdCBu0lWlj1i%2FQLQ8s%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > ' > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > Does your steps look the > same ? > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > czw., 18 lip 2019 o 16:31 > Piotr > > Zarzycki > > >> < > > >> > > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > >> > > napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >> I did that and I'm getting > wrong > > >> password or > > >> > user > > >> > > name, so > > >> > > > that > > >> > > > >> must be > > >> > > > >> > >> different case. Let me try > now > > again. > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o 16:21 > Alex > > Harui > > >> > > > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> > > > >> > >> napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > >>> It is asking for your > GitHub > > >> username. Type > > >> > it in > > >> > > and hit > > >> > > > >> enter, then > > >> > > > >> > >>> it will ask for your > GitHub 2FA > > >> token. We > > >> > don't > > >> > > store our > > >> > > > >> credentials > > >> > > > >> > on > > >> > > > >> > >>> the machine. That's why > the > > >> Succeeded email > > >> > says > > >> > > you > > >> > > > will > > >> > > > >> need your > > >> > > > >> > GH > > >> > > > >> > >>> credentials. > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> HTH, > > >> > > > >> > >>> -Alex > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> On 7/18/19, 7:06 AM, "Piotr > > Zarzycki" < > > >> > > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> In the first step I'm > getting > > >> following > > >> > error > > >> > > during > > >> > > > an > > >> > > > >> attempt of > > >> > > > >> > >>> login: > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> git push > > >> > > > >> > >>> fatal: > HttpRequestException > > >> encountered. > > >> > > > >> > >>> An error occurred > while > > sending > > >> the > > >> > request. > > >> > > > >> > >>> Username for ' > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837434994244&sdata=QpupS4kWVseAbVz%2FwztfXocd0nyNT289pvdpF3ywloY%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > >>> ': > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> There is being > suggestion > > how to > > >> resolve > > >> > it > > >> > > here [1], > > >> > > > but > > >> > > > >> I'm not > > >> > > > >> > >>> sure > > >> > > > >> > >>> whether I can do that > on > > remote PC > > >> ? > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> [1] > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcodeshare.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-solve-the-github-error-fatal-httprequestexception-encountered%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837435004238&sdata=PSROQF2A1W96zH%2F7DhLNGND%2F9Hv6huZ26HW30NRohpM%3D&reserved=0 > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Thanks, > > >> > > > >> > >>> Piotr > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> czw., 18 lip 2019 o > 15:06 > > Piotr > > >> Zarzycki < > > >> > > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > >> > >>> napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Hi Alex, > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > I'm getting back to > that. > > Again > > >> some > > >> > > questions: > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > I think you will > need to > > set up > > >> your PC > > >> > for > > >> > > most, > > >> > > > if not > > >> > > > >> all, of > > >> > > > >> > >>> the steps > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> in [1] in order to > > >> compare/verify the > > >> > output > > >> > > from > > >> > > > [2]. > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Above means that I > don't > > need to > > >> setup > > >> > my own > > >> > > PC > > >> > > > fully, > > >> > > > >> but just > > >> > > > >> > >>> to be > > >> > > > >> > >>> > able to build > project, so > > could > > >> compare > > >> > the > > >> > > results > > >> > > > of > > >> > > > >> build with > > >> > > > >> > >>> what > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Jenkins produce ? > > >> > > > >> > >>> > However you are > saying > > later > > >> that you > > >> > didn't > > >> > > setup > > >> > > > step > > >> > > > >> where > > >> > > > >> > >>> there is > > >> > > > >> > >>> > produced > dist/release > > folder. > > >> What I > > >> > got > > >> > > when I > > >> > > > launch > > >> > > > >> each of > > >> > > > >> > >>> those > > >> > > > >> > >>> > step actually at the > end ? > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Before you answer me > I will > > >> study and > > >> > launch > > >> > > each > > >> > > > of step > > >> > > > >> on > > >> > > > >> > >>> Jenkins to > > >> > > > >> > >>> > see what will happen. > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Thanks, > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Piotr > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > pon., 8 lip 2019 o > 16:59 > > Piotr > > >> Zarzycki > > >> > < > > >> > > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> > napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Hi, > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> I'm occupied till > at least > > >> Wednesday > > >> > with > > >> > > important > > >> > > > >> task, so I > > >> > > > >> > >>> hope to > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> look into release on > > Thursday. > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Thanks, > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Piotr > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> sob., 6 lip 2019 o > 17:23 > > Alex > > >> Harui > > >> > > > >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> napisał(a): > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> On 7/6/19, 7:22 AM, > > "Piotr > > >> Zarzycki" < > > >> > > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> Hi Alex, > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> I finally sat > down > > and > > >> started to > > >> > read > > >> > > all > > >> > > > >> instructions > > >> > > > >> > >>> [1][2] > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> related to > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> RM job. I feel > lost > > with > > >> that a > > >> > bit, so > > >> > > I > > >> > > > wanted to > > >> > > > >> confirm > > >> > > > >> > >>> what I > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> just > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> read - correct > me if > > I'm > > >> wrong > > >> > with > > >> > > anything. > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> 1. First > instruction > > [1] is > > >> > actually > > >> > > steps > > >> > > > which I > > >> > > > >> would be > > >> > > > >> > >>> doing on > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> my PC, > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> but automatic > release > > >> process > > >> > actually > > >> > > covers > > >> > > > it > > >> > > > >> for me. > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> 2. I still > have to > > do at > > >> least > > >> > some of > > >> > > the > > >> > > > steps > > >> > > > >> from [1], > > >> > > > >> > >>> but only > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> to > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> compare/verify > > output from > > >> [2] > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> I think you will > need to > > set > > >> up your > > >> > PC for > > >> > > most, > > >> > > > if > > >> > > > >> not all, > > >> > > > >> > of > > >> > > > >> > >>> the > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> steps in [1] in > order to > > >> > compare/verify the > > >> > > > output from > > >> > > > >> [2]. I > > >> > > > >> > >>> don't know > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> for sure because I > did > > not > > >> want to > > >> > take the > > >> > > time > > >> > > > to try > > >> > > > >> to set > > >> > > > >> > >>> up a new > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> PC. I only had > time to > > do the > > >> > testing of > > >> > > the > > >> > > > >> compare/verify > > >> > > > >> > >>> steps on a > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> Mac. I want > others to > > >> understand how > > >> > this > > >> > > process > > >> > > > >> works and > > >> > > > >> > make > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> improvements > themselves > > by > > >> debugging > > >> > when > > >> > > things > > >> > > > don't > > >> > > > >> go > > >> > > > >> > >>> right. This > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> should not be > something > > that > > >> only I > > >> > know > > >> > > how to > > >> > > > fix. > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> There is a > sentence > > which > > >> saying: > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> "The released > > artifacts > > >> should > > >> > end up on > > >> > > > >> dist/release > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> < > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cc75f329f79784d3203b108d71fcced83%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637012837435004238&sdata=S0jH8a4JPoHrvWpJ2LV8IeBWWxiZTvul%2B%2FQXiCOgq0c%3D&reserved=0>
