There are a lot of intelligent things the Maven release plugin does.  One is to 
remove the "SNAPSHOT" from the dependencies in the poms.  So when builds are 
happening in the releases, it should not be using the SNAPSHOT version but 
rather, a release version from somewhere.  It might look in staging, I don't 
really know, but it does seem to find something without SNAPSHOT to use.

-Alex

On 8/13/19, 2:05 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Wow that is good point. I think if build of asjs is being done by Maven it
    will be taken from 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT I think so. It definitely won't use
    staged compiler - You need to point such stuff explicitly using settings.xml
    
    On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 10:20 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
    
    > I'm not sure you should skip the uploading.  I'm not sure where typedefs
    > and asjs will get its compiler artifacts if they haven't been uploaded.
    >
    > The output says that it is looking in the following folder for artifacts:
    >
    >
    > 
d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\royale096\artifacts\archive\target\checkout\release-dir
    >
    > For me, my temp folder is:
    >
    >   ~/temp/releasesteps
    >
    > And the artifacts are in:
    >
    >   artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir
    >
    > There seems to be another level in there for you (sources\royale096).
    >
    > HTH,
    > -Alex
    >
    > On 8/13/19, 11:31 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >     Sorry about that. I was going trough the steps but I have left steps
    > for
    >     signing artifacts and uploading them at the end.
    >
    >     When for all 3 repos I had build, comparison and sign in works I tried
    >     upload it using provided instructions.
    >
    >     If you are not seeing any suspicious in that log I need to understand
    > more
    >     why actually upload wasn't triggered.
    >
    >     Artifacts were definitely generated correctly.
    >
    >     Thanks,
    >     Piotr
    >
    >     On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 5:33 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    > wrote:
    >
    >     > I'm not sure what warnings you are referring to.
    >     >
    >     > If you look at releasesteps.xml, you can see that it is using 
Maven's
    >     > wagon:upload goal to upload from a particular folder.  Are there
    > jars in
    >     > that folder (or its subfolders)?  Examine the output of the previous
    > Ant
    >     > release steps for step 003 to see if the source package built
    > correctly and
    >     > binary matched.  If the previous steps were successful then the
    > upload
    >     > should be picking up those artifacts.
    >     >
    >     > I'm a bit confused that you got to step 11 according to email but
    > now are
    >     > saying you never got past step 3.
    >     >
    >     > Also, I do not recommend using a temporary folder inside your 
working
    >     > copy.  It will be far safer to specify an absolute path to a folder
    > outside
    >     > of your working copy.  Find a good place to add that to the wiki
    >     > instructions.
    >     >
    >     > HTH,
    >     > -Alex
    >     >
    >     > On 8/13/19, 2:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >     >
    >     >     Hi Alex,
    >     >
    >     >     Thanks for information. I went today trough the steps again. I
    > reached
    >     >     point where I'm trying to upload artifacts, but script keep
    > saying me
    >     > that
    >     >     there is nothing to upload. Is it because of those warnings at
    > the
    >     >     beginnings ? [1]
    >     >
    >     >     [1]
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fzvxoi&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483828790&amp;sdata=xw7LERONoJHq%2FflqQQMXwHTSZ6H9DuF5X1zigCeEygo%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >
    >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     Piotr
    >     >
    >     >     pon., 12 sie 2019 o 19:31 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     > napisał(a):
    >     >
    >     >     > Getting back to this.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > You can start a vote on the results.  If we get this process
    >     > working, it
    >     >     > should be relatively easy for others to do releases as well so
    > we
    >     > will
    >     >     > hopefully do releases more often and it won't matter if
    > someone's
    >     > recent
    >     >     > changes made it into the RC or not.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being
    >     > created
    >     >     > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and
    > ask the
    >     > RM to
    >     >     > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the
    > develop
    >     >     > branch.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > The only build output I could find on the server for the 7/24
    > both
    >     > show
    >     >     > that the date/time given back in step 009 was invalid.  As you
    > can
    >     > see from
    >     >     > the exception, Java is parsing the string and the expectation
    > is
    >     > that the
    >     >     > string you enter conforms to the Java format of:
    >     >     >
    >     >     > MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
    >     >     >
    >     >     > The documentation for this format is in the Java
    > documentation.  As I
    >     >     > explained in an earlier reply, "Z" stands for timezone and you
    > must
    >     > supply
    >     >     > one.  It shouldn't matter which one you supply, I use the one
    > I'm
    >     > in, but
    >     >     > again, the whole point of this exercise is to find bugs and
    > improve
    >     >     > documentation of the process.  In your most recent attempt,
    > you did
    >     > not
    >     >     > specify a timezone.  In the one prior, you did not supply a
    > year or
    >     > a space
    >     >     > between date and hour.  Please update the documentation or the
    >     > instructions
    >     >     > in the Jenkins jobs to make it more clear that you have to be
    >     > accurate in
    >     >     > specifying the date.
    >     >     >
    >     >     > HTH,
    >     >     > -Alex
    >     >     >
    >     >     > On 7/24/19, 9:01 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     > wrote:
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     Btw. Once I finish steps - Can I publish artefacts and
    > start RC1
    >     > vote
    >     >     > on
    >     >     >     dev ? Does anything I should know at the end which is not
    >     > mention ?
    >     >     >
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:59 Piotr Zarzycki <
    >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     napisał(a):
    >     >     >
    >     >     >     > By compare to dypedefs step - do you mean that I should
    > look
    >     > into
    >     >     > Jenkins
    >     >     >     > configuration of that steps or something else ?
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:56 Alex Harui
    > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >> Hi Piotr,
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >> You can compare the output from previous builds and
    > also the
    >     >     > typedefs
    >     >     >     >> build configuration because both successfully used the
    > date
    >     >     > format.  The
    >     >     >     >> Java documentation says that "Z" is for timezone.  It
    >     > shouldn't
    >     >     > matter
    >     >     >     >> which one you use, but in the typedefs you hadn't
    > specified
    >     > one at
    >     >     > all.
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >> It looks like in this case extra quotes are wrapped
    > around
    >     > the date.
    >     >     >     >> You'll have to compare against the typedefs steps to
    > see why
    >     > that's
    >     >     >     >> happening.
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >> HTH,
    >     >     >     >> -Alex
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >> On 7/24/19, 3:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     I was able to overcome issue with date for 
typedefs.
    >     > Instruction
    >     >     >     >> there is
    >     >     >     >>     saying:
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
    >     >     >     >>     > Where MM/dd/yy is the US-formatted date and HH:MM
    > is a
    >     > faked
    >     >     > time to
    >     >     >     >>     > encode the release version such as:
    >     >     >     >>     > 2/10/19 9:06 -0800
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     I have typed 7/24/2019 HH (I don't remember what 
was
    >     > that) and
    >     >     > -0800
    >     >     >     >> - This
    >     >     >     >>     part I completely do not understand - what is for
    > there
    >     > minus ?
    >     >     > Can
    >     >     >     >> you
    >     >     >     >>     send exact example of what I should put there ?
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     What's more I have went trough forward and in steps
    >     > related to
    >     >     >     >> royale-asjs
    >     >     >     >>     I see that typing either
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     7/24/19 9:06 -0800 or  just 7/24/19 9:06 causes an
    >     > exception
    >     >     > with
    >     >     >     >> following
    >     >     >     >>     message:
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO] COMPC
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO] Loading configuration:
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_011\target\checkout\frameworks\themes\Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Yellow-Theme\target\compile-swf-config.xml
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO]
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO] java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date:
    >     > ""7/24/19
    >     >     > 9:06""
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
    >     > java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.processFileEntry(SWCTarget.java:330)
    >     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.addFileEntriesToSWC(SWCTarget.java:291)
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     It looks like there are some additional parentheses
    > -
    >     > Maybe
    >     >     > it's an
    >     >     >     >> issue.
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     Piotr
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     wt., 23 lip 2019 o 18:56 Alex Harui
    >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     >> napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     > Hi Piotr,
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     > What differences did you see?  I downloaded the
    > two
    >     > SWCs and
    >     >     > the
    >     >     >     >> only
    >     >     >     >>     > difference I saw was the timestamps in the
    > catalog.xml
    >     > in the
    >     >     > SWCs.
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     > The timestamps are set by the SWCDATE parameter
    > in Step
    >     > 005.
    >     >     > The
    >     >     >     >> log
    >     >     >     >>     > indicates that you did not specify a timezone so
    > maybe
    >     > that's
    >     >     > why
    >     >     >     >> the
    >     >     >     >>     > timestamps are not matching up.  Please update 
the
    >     >     > instructions so
    >     >     >     >> that
    >     >     >     >>     > future RMs do not forget to include a timezone.
    > The
    >     > example
    >     >     >     >> pattern that
    >     >     >     >>     > Jenkins should show should include a timezone.
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     > You will have to remove the tag and revert any
    > commits
    >     > from
    >     >     > steps
    >     >     >     >> 5, 6,
    >     >     >     >>     > and 7 before re-running step 5.
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     > HTH,
    >     >     >     >>     > -Alex
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     > On 7/23/19, 6:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >> wrote:
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     Thanks! I have moved forward and in step 7 -
    >     > related to
    >     >     >     >> typedefs during
    >     >     >     >>     >     build on my local machine I got mismatch
    > error [1].
    >     > What
    >     >     > could
    >     >     >     >> actually
    >     >     >     >>     >     happen? I did compare some files inside those
    > two
    >     > swc and
    >     >     > they
    >     >     >     >> are
    >     >     >     >>     > indeed
    >     >     >     >>     >     different - I have used Total Command to
    > compare
    >     > them.
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     When I'm starting steps related to typedefs -
    > first
    >     > step
    >     >     >     >> actually
    >     >     >     >>     > checkout
    >     >     >     >>     >     fresh sources ? I'm wondering whether Jenkins
    >     > checkout
    >     >     > them
    >     >     >     >> earlier
    >     >     >     >>     > when I
    >     >     >     >>     >     started one of the step before typedefs
    > steps? This
    >     > those
    >     >     > 2
    >     >     >     >> files [2]
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     [1]
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbren2&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=XNBptCzhhRq8WQiwgI4x0%2Fr0hbMBACrfa2ZD%2F73QCsE%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     [2]
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2icJBcCsTMZrzfnTTuQ%3Fe%3DNwidMg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=jhL%2BxyjSfzsGm4SpTMAASz7ufdNMIIttuuQnmfmgE5Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>     >     Piotr
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     wt., 23 lip 2019 o 07:31 Alex Harui
    >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     >>     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     > Hi Piotr,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     > The email with the subject "Release Step 
003
    >     > Succeeded"
    >     >     > says:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     > 1. If you are releasing the utils jars
    >     >     > (compiler-jburg-types
    >     >     >     >> and
    >     >     >     >>     >     > compiler-build-tools), Run:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >   ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
    >     > -Dutils=true
    >     >     >     >>     >     > -Drelease.version=0.9.6
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     > It looks like you are not using the
    > -Dutils=true.
    >     >     > Please
    >     >     >     >> improve the
    >     >     >     >>     >     > email so future RMs will not miss that
    > parameter.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     > Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>     >     > -Alex
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     > On 7/22/19, 9:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
    >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     > wrote:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     I have made adjustment to
    > documentation. I'm
    >     > on
    >     >     > step 3
    >     >     >     >> where I
    >     >     >     >>     > need
    >     >     >     >>     >     > build
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     on my end sources. I have run on my PC
    > this:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     ant -f releasesteps.xml 
Release_Step_003
    >     >     >     >> -Drelease.version=0.9.6
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     It downloads sources and maven
    > artifacts, but
    >     > it
    >     >     > also
    >     >     >     >> tried
    >     >     >     >>     > build them
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     automatically as I understa. I got
    > error [1]
    >     > - it
    >     >     >     >> understandable
    >     >     >     >>     > cause
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     there is no 1.0.0 compiler-jburg-types.
    >     > Should I on
    >     >     > my
    >     >     >     >> own build
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     first compiler-jburg-types with 1.0.0
    > to have
    >     > stuff
    >     >     > in
    >     >     >     >> local
    >     >     >     >>     > cache or
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     should I made something else ?
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     [1]
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fa10nq&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=Fko2OkMVd84tf7QCN8osmKGISlpdNO1V%2BiQKQtSP9ak%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     Piotr
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     sob., 20 lip 2019 o 06:25 Alex Harui
    >     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     >>     >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > Please update the wiki in a way that
    > the
    >     > next
    >     >     > person
    >     >     >     >> will know
    >     >     >     >>     > which
    >     >     >     >>     >     > 2FA
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > token to use.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > -Alex
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > On 7/19/19, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
    > <
    >     >     >     >>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     So far so good. I'm on a step 3,
    > where
    >     > I need
    >     >     > build
    >     >     >     >>     > artifacts on
    >     >     >     >>     >     > my
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > sight
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     and compare them with what 
Jenkins
    >     > produce.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     I will get back to that probably
    > on
    >     > Monday.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 1:40 PM
    > Piotr
    >     > Zarzycki <
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     wrote:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Thanks it's working. I'm moving
    >     > forward
    >     >     > with that
    >     >     >     >> stuff
    >     >     >     >>     > let's
    >     >     >     >>     >     > see
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > how far
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > I go with it.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Piotr
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > pt., 19 lip 2019 o 05:49 Alex
    > Harui
    >     >     >     >>     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> I am using the token generated
    > this
    >     > way:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Fen%2Farticles%2Fcreating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-command-line&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=NpYOBMTdzTXu8fb62lfbQlmMVKFUjk0GVD2qBjWqGJ0%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> There is no short code from
    > Google
    >     >     > Authenticator.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> -Alex
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> On 7/18/19, 8:46 AM, "Piotr
    >     > Zarzycki" <
    >     >     >     >>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > wrote:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     I'm using 2FA
    > authentication,
    >     > second
    >     >     > step
    >     >     >     >> for me is
    >     >     >     >>     > typing
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > short code
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> from
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     Google Authenticator
    >     > application. Do
    >     >     > you use
    >     >     >     >>     > something
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > different?
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     czw., 18 lip 2019 o 17:42
    > Alex
    >     > Harui
    >     >     >     >>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > I don't think git 
version
    >     > matters.
    >     >     > Are you
    >     >     >     >> using
    >     >     >     >>     > your
    >     >     >     >>     >     > 2fa
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > token as
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> the
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > password? It should be a
    >     > really long
    >     >     >     >> sequence of
    >     >     >     >>     >     > characters.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Get Outlook for Android<
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=1UMVrTcqhCotXpFeT7NqU3Ne4uOMQbw5Tk3wmgXFjrg%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     > ________________________________
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
    >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Sent: Thursday, July 18,
    > 2019
    >     >     > 7:43:44 AM
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > To:
    > dev@royale.apache.org
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Subject: Re: Discuss of
    >     > release steps
    >     >     >     >> preparation
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Maybe Git just should be
    >     > updated on
    >     >     >     >> Machine ? I
    >     >     >     >>     > see
    >     >     >     >>     >     > 2.15 and
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > there
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> is 2.22
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > already.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
    > 16:35 Piotr
    >     >     > Zarzycki <
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > When I do git push -
    > I'm
    >     > getting
    >     >     > separate
    >     >     >     >>     > window with
    >     >     >     >>     >     > title
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> GitHub Login
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > -
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > where I can enter my
    >     >     > login/password. I'm
    >     >     >     >> doing
    >     >     >     >>     > that
    >     >     >     >>     >     > and in
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > the
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> next step
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > it
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > throws me an error in
    > the
    >     > console
    >     >     > - same
    >     >     >     >> what I
    >     >     >     >>     > have
    >     >     >     >>     >     > pasted
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > in
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> previous
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > email.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > I'm typing again login
    > and
    >     > password
    >     >     >     >> cause It's
    >     >     >     >>     > asking
    >     >     >     >>     >     > me as
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > you
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> can see
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > in
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > the previous email. In
    > the
    >     > results
    >     >     > I get:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > remote: Invalid
    > username or
    >     >     > password.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > fatal: Authentication
    > failed
    >     > for '
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=f7IUJnNvqNTHLI4Ei97Ta%2FXvq0IfJSR%2FSRHMzD2sGF0%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > '
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > Does your steps look
    > the
    >     > same ?
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
    > 16:31
    >     > Piotr
    >     >     > Zarzycki
    >     >     >     >> <
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> I did that and I'm
    > getting
    >     > wrong
    >     >     >     >> password or
    >     >     >     >>     > user
    >     >     >     >>     >     > name, so
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > that
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> must be
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> different case. Let
    > me try
    >     > now
    >     >     > again.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o
    > 16:21
    >     > Alex
    >     >     > Harui
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> It is asking for 
your
    >     > GitHub
    >     >     >     >> username.  Type
    >     >     >     >>     > it in
    >     >     >     >>     >     > and hit
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> enter, then
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> it will ask for your
    >     > GitHub 2FA
    >     >     >     >> token.  We
    >     >     >     >>     > don't
    >     >     >     >>     >     > store our
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> credentials
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > on
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the machine.
    >  That's why
    >     > the
    >     >     >     >> Succeeded email
    >     >     >     >>     > says
    >     >     >     >>     >     > you
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > will
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> need your
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > GH
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> credentials.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> HTH,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> -Alex
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> On 7/18/19, 7:06 AM,
    > "Piotr
    >     >     > Zarzycki" <
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> wrote:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     In the first
    > step I'm
    >     > getting
    >     >     >     >> following
    >     >     >     >>     > error
    >     >     >     >>     >     > during
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > an
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> attempt of
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> login:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     git push
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     fatal:
    >     > HttpRequestException
    >     >     >     >> encountered.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>        An error
    > occurred
    >     > while
    >     >     > sending
    >     >     >     >> the
    >     >     >     >>     > request.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Username for '
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=%2BPFu%2B02j%2Fz5QyNoaqmPlAQX8%2BdkHXQcr6FrvyycQUUY%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> ':
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     There is being
    >     > suggestion
    >     >     > how to
    >     >     >     >> resolve
    >     >     >     >>     > it
    >     >     >     >>     >     > here [1],
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > but
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> I'm not
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> sure
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     whether I can do
    > that
    >     > on
    >     >     > remote PC
    >     >     >     >> ?
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     [1]
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >
    >     >     >     >>     >
    >     >     >     >>
    >     >     >
    >     >
    > 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcodeshare.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-solve-the-github-error-fatal-httprequestexception-encountered%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C374a24bd51be4c55dbc908d72031fde1%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013271483838786&amp;sdata=fW44cXPW%2ByLijQjqq%2FRzCP%2F34TFdVFAoIkMog45T%2Fh8%3D&amp;reserved=0
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Piotr
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     czw., 18 lip
    > 2019 o
    >     > 15:06
    >     >     > Piotr
    >     >     >     >> Zarzycki <
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Hi Alex,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > I'm getting
    > back to
    >     > that.
    >     >     > Again
    >     >     >     >> some
    >     >     >     >>     >     > questions:
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > I think you
    > will
    >     > need to
    >     >     > set up
    >     >     >     >> your PC
    >     >     >     >>     > for
    >     >     >     >>     >     > most,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > if not
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> all, of
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the steps
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> in [1] in
    > order to
    >     >     >     >> compare/verify the
    >     >     >     >>     > output
    >     >     >     >>     >     > from
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > [2].
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Above means
    > that I
    >     > don't
    >     >     > need to
    >     >     >     >> setup
    >     >     >     >>     > my own
    >     >     >     >>     >     > PC
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > fully,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> but just
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> to be
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > able to build
    >     > project, so
    >     >     > could
    >     >     >     >> compare
    >     >     >     >>     > the
    >     >     >     >>     >     > results
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > of
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> build with
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> what
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Jenkins
    > produce ?
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > However you 
are
    >     > saying
    >     >     > later
    >     >     >     >> that you
    >     >     >     >>     > didn't
    >     >     >     >>     >     > setup
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > step
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> where
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> there is
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > produced
    >     > dist/release
    >     >     > folder.
    >     >     >     >> What I
    >     >     >     >>     > got
    >     >     >     >>     >     > when I
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > launch
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> each of
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> those
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > step actually
    > at the
    >     > end ?
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Before you
    > answer me
    >     > I will
    >     >     >     >> study and
    >     >     >     >>     > launch
    >     >     >     >>     >     > each
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     > of step
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> on
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> Jenkins to
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > see what will
    > happen.
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Thanks,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Piotr
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > pon., 8 lip
    > 2019 o
    >     > 16:59
    >     >     > Piotr
    >     >     >     >> Zarzycki
    >     >     >     >>     > <
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
    > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > napisał(a):
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> Hi,
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> I'm occupied
    > till
    >     > at least
    >     >     >     >> Wednesday
    >     >     >     >>     > with
    >     >     >     >>     >     > important
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> task, so I
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> hope to
    >     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
    

Reply via email to