I'm trying to understand part of the script which is responsible for upload
it is for example in compiler: Release_Step_003_Upload
My folder contains:
- artifacts folder
- sources folder
Now you are launching command:

"><exec executable="${mvn}" dir="${artifactfolder}/sources" failonerror="
true" >
            <arg value="wagon:upload" />
            <arg value="-X" />
            <arg value="
-Dwagon.fromDir=${artifactfolder}/artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir"
/>
            <arg value="-P" />
            <arg value="upload-release-to-staging,-main" />
        </exec>

pom.xml is being taken from sources to process that stuff. Next fromDir is
being setup let's say like that ->
d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\
- It contains pom.xml

When you next setup fromDir it will take current directory +
${artifactfolder}/artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir.

Is it bug or am I doing something wrong ?




śr., 14 sie 2019 o 10:14 Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):

> If your folder with artifacts is in  ~/temp/releasesteps - What do you
> type when script asking you about ?
>
> get-artifact-folder:
>     [input] Enter the temporary folder to store the downloaded artifacts:
>
> wt., 13 sie 2019 o 22:20 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> napisał(a):
>
>> I'm not sure you should skip the uploading.  I'm not sure where typedefs
>> and asjs will get its compiler artifacts if they haven't been uploaded.
>>
>> The output says that it is looking in the following folder for artifacts:
>>
>>
>> d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\royale096\artifacts\archive\target\checkout\release-dir
>>
>> For me, my temp folder is:
>>
>>   ~/temp/releasesteps
>>
>> And the artifacts are in:
>>
>>   artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir
>>
>> There seems to be another level in there for you (sources\royale096).
>>
>> HTH,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 8/13/19, 11:31 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Sorry about that. I was going trough the steps but I have left steps
>> for
>>     signing artifacts and uploading them at the end.
>>
>>     When for all 3 repos I had build, comparison and sign in works I tried
>>     upload it using provided instructions.
>>
>>     If you are not seeing any suspicious in that log I need to understand
>> more
>>     why actually upload wasn't triggered.
>>
>>     Artifacts were definitely generated correctly.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     Piotr
>>
>>     On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 5:33 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>     > I'm not sure what warnings you are referring to.
>>     >
>>     > If you look at releasesteps.xml, you can see that it is using
>> Maven's
>>     > wagon:upload goal to upload from a particular folder.  Are there
>> jars in
>>     > that folder (or its subfolders)?  Examine the output of the
>> previous Ant
>>     > release steps for step 003 to see if the source package built
>> correctly and
>>     > binary matched.  If the previous steps were successful then the
>> upload
>>     > should be picking up those artifacts.
>>     >
>>     > I'm a bit confused that you got to step 11 according to email but
>> now are
>>     > saying you never got past step 3.
>>     >
>>     > Also, I do not recommend using a temporary folder inside your
>> working
>>     > copy.  It will be far safer to specify an absolute path to a folder
>> outside
>>     > of your working copy.  Find a good place to add that to the wiki
>>     > instructions.
>>     >
>>     > HTH,
>>     > -Alex
>>     >
>>     > On 8/13/19, 2:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>     >
>>     >     Hi Alex,
>>     >
>>     >     Thanks for information. I went today trough the steps again. I
>> reached
>>     >     point where I'm trying to upload artifacts, but script keep
>> saying me
>>     > that
>>     >     there is nothing to upload. Is it because of those warnings at
>> the
>>     >     beginnings ? [1]
>>     >
>>     >     [1]
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fzvxoi&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110163174&amp;sdata=4hzhaPPkBXhC4ACCdnZ1GEym6MRSVVsIhisRLT8vvjs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >
>>     >     Thanks,
>>     >     Piotr
>>     >
>>     >     pon., 12 sie 2019 o 19:31 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     > napisał(a):
>>     >
>>     >     > Getting back to this.
>>     >     >
>>     >     > You can start a vote on the results.  If we get this process
>>     > working, it
>>     >     > should be relatively easy for others to do releases as well
>> so we
>>     > will
>>     >     > hopefully do releases more often and it won't matter if
>> someone's
>>     > recent
>>     >     > changes made it into the RC or not.
>>     >     >
>>     >     > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being
>>     > created
>>     >     > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and
>> ask the
>>     > RM to
>>     >     > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the
>> develop
>>     >     > branch.
>>     >     >
>>     >     > The only build output I could find on the server for the 7/24
>> both
>>     > show
>>     >     > that the date/time given back in step 009 was invalid.  As
>> you can
>>     > see from
>>     >     > the exception, Java is parsing the string and the expectation
>> is
>>     > that the
>>     >     > string you enter conforms to the Java format of:
>>     >     >
>>     >     > MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
>>     >     >
>>     >     > The documentation for this format is in the Java
>> documentation.  As I
>>     >     > explained in an earlier reply, "Z" stands for timezone and
>> you must
>>     > supply
>>     >     > one.  It shouldn't matter which one you supply, I use the one
>> I'm
>>     > in, but
>>     >     > again, the whole point of this exercise is to find bugs and
>> improve
>>     >     > documentation of the process.  In your most recent attempt,
>> you did
>>     > not
>>     >     > specify a timezone.  In the one prior, you did not supply a
>> year or
>>     > a space
>>     >     > between date and hour.  Please update the documentation or the
>>     > instructions
>>     >     > in the Jenkins jobs to make it more clear that you have to be
>>     > accurate in
>>     >     > specifying the date.
>>     >     >
>>     >     > HTH,
>>     >     > -Alex
>>     >     >
>>     >     > On 7/24/19, 9:01 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     > wrote:
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     Btw. Once I finish steps - Can I publish artefacts and
>> start RC1
>>     > vote
>>     >     > on
>>     >     >     dev ? Does anything I should know at the end which is not
>>     > mention ?
>>     >     >
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:59 Piotr Zarzycki <
>>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     napisał(a):
>>     >     >
>>     >     >     > By compare to dypedefs step - do you mean that I should
>> look
>>     > into
>>     >     > Jenkins
>>     >     >     > configuration of that steps or something else ?
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:56 Alex Harui
>> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >> Hi Piotr,
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> You can compare the output from previous builds and
>> also the
>>     >     > typedefs
>>     >     >     >> build configuration because both successfully used the
>> date
>>     >     > format.  The
>>     >     >     >> Java documentation says that "Z" is for timezone.  It
>>     > shouldn't
>>     >     > matter
>>     >     >     >> which one you use, but in the typedefs you hadn't
>> specified
>>     > one at
>>     >     > all.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> It looks like in this case extra quotes are wrapped
>> around
>>     > the date.
>>     >     >     >> You'll have to compare against the typedefs steps to
>> see why
>>     > that's
>>     >     >     >> happening.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> HTH,
>>     >     >     >> -Alex
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >> On 7/24/19, 3:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     > wrote:
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     Hi Alex,
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     I was able to overcome issue with date for
>> typedefs.
>>     > Instruction
>>     >     >     >> there is
>>     >     >     >>     saying:
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
>>     >     >     >>     > Where MM/dd/yy is the US-formatted date and
>> HH:MM is a
>>     > faked
>>     >     > time to
>>     >     >     >>     > encode the release version such as:
>>     >     >     >>     > 2/10/19 9:06 -0800
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     I have typed 7/24/2019 HH (I don't remember what
>> was
>>     > that) and
>>     >     > -0800
>>     >     >     >> - This
>>     >     >     >>     part I completely do not understand - what is for
>> there
>>     > minus ?
>>     >     > Can
>>     >     >     >> you
>>     >     >     >>     send exact example of what I should put there ?
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     What's more I have went trough forward and in steps
>>     > related to
>>     >     >     >> royale-asjs
>>     >     >     >>     I see that typing either
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     7/24/19 9:06 -0800 or  just 7/24/19 9:06 causes an
>>     > exception
>>     >     > with
>>     >     >     >> following
>>     >     >     >>     message:
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO] COMPC
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO] Loading configuration:
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_011\target\checkout\frameworks\themes\Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Yellow-Theme\target\compile-swf-config.xml
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO]
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO] java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date:
>>     > ""7/24/19
>>     >     > 9:06""
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
>>     > java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.processFileEntry(SWCTarget.java:330)
>>     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.addFileEntriesToSWC(SWCTarget.java:291)
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     It looks like there are some additional
>> parentheses -
>>     > Maybe
>>     >     > it's an
>>     >     >     >> issue.
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     Piotr
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     wt., 23 lip 2019 o 18:56 Alex Harui
>>     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >> napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     > Hi Piotr,
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     > What differences did you see?  I downloaded the
>> two
>>     > SWCs and
>>     >     > the
>>     >     >     >> only
>>     >     >     >>     > difference I saw was the timestamps in the
>> catalog.xml
>>     > in the
>>     >     > SWCs.
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     > The timestamps are set by the SWCDATE parameter
>> in Step
>>     > 005.
>>     >     > The
>>     >     >     >> log
>>     >     >     >>     > indicates that you did not specify a timezone so
>> maybe
>>     > that's
>>     >     > why
>>     >     >     >> the
>>     >     >     >>     > timestamps are not matching up.  Please update
>> the
>>     >     > instructions so
>>     >     >     >> that
>>     >     >     >>     > future RMs do not forget to include a timezone.
>> The
>>     > example
>>     >     >     >> pattern that
>>     >     >     >>     > Jenkins should show should include a timezone.
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     > You will have to remove the tag and revert any
>> commits
>>     > from
>>     >     > steps
>>     >     >     >> 5, 6,
>>     >     >     >>     > and 7 before re-running step 5.
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     > HTH,
>>     >     >     >>     > -Alex
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     > On 7/23/19, 6:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >> wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     Hi Alex,
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     Thanks! I have moved forward and in step 7 -
>>     > related to
>>     >     >     >> typedefs during
>>     >     >     >>     >     build on my local machine I got mismatch
>> error [1].
>>     > What
>>     >     > could
>>     >     >     >> actually
>>     >     >     >>     >     happen? I did compare some files inside
>> those two
>>     > swc and
>>     >     > they
>>     >     >     >> are
>>     >     >     >>     > indeed
>>     >     >     >>     >     different - I have used Total Command to
>> compare
>>     > them.
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     When I'm starting steps related to typedefs
>> - first
>>     > step
>>     >     >     >> actually
>>     >     >     >>     > checkout
>>     >     >     >>     >     fresh sources ? I'm wondering whether Jenkins
>>     > checkout
>>     >     > them
>>     >     >     >> earlier
>>     >     >     >>     > when I
>>     >     >     >>     >     started one of the step before typedefs
>> steps? This
>>     > those
>>     >     > 2
>>     >     >     >> files [2]
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     [1]
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbren2&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=%2Ba9NxCNjcO08f8ZbgePErL1SZvxaD6lpSn6DsQbr8Ik%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     [2]
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2icJBcCsTMZrzfnTTuQ%3Fe%3DNwidMg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=ClD%2BCcEcZ1%2BzRznkEpiECFV7x%2FYjwVKxUs3%2Bcp9Fay0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     Piotr
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     wt., 23 lip 2019 o 07:31 Alex Harui
>>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >>     > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     > Hi Piotr,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     > The email with the subject "Release Step
>> 003
>>     > Succeeded"
>>     >     > says:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     > 1. If you are releasing the utils jars
>>     >     > (compiler-jburg-types
>>     >     >     >> and
>>     >     >     >>     >     > compiler-build-tools), Run:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >   ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
>>     > -Dutils=true
>>     >     >     >>     >     > -Drelease.version=0.9.6
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     > It looks like you are not using the
>> -Dutils=true.
>>     >     > Please
>>     >     >     >> improve the
>>     >     >     >>     >     > email so future RMs will not miss that
>> parameter.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     > Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     > -Alex
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     > On 7/22/19, 9:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     > wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     Hi Alex,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     I have made adjustment to
>> documentation. I'm
>>     > on
>>     >     > step 3
>>     >     >     >> where I
>>     >     >     >>     > need
>>     >     >     >>     >     > build
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     on my end sources. I have run on my PC
>> this:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     ant -f releasesteps.xml
>> Release_Step_003
>>     >     >     >> -Drelease.version=0.9.6
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     It downloads sources and maven
>> artifacts, but
>>     > it
>>     >     > also
>>     >     >     >> tried
>>     >     >     >>     > build them
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     automatically as I understa. I got
>> error [1]
>>     > - it
>>     >     >     >> understandable
>>     >     >     >>     > cause
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     there is no 1.0.0 compiler-jburg-types.
>>     > Should I on
>>     >     > my
>>     >     >     >> own build
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     first compiler-jburg-types with 1.0.0
>> to have
>>     > stuff
>>     >     > in
>>     >     >     >> local
>>     >     >     >>     > cache or
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     should I made something else ?
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     [1]
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fa10nq&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=4dlbh3xDClPiFNz%2BIYPy2X8QQvAsVuAaIUcuKZZVcSw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     Piotr
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     sob., 20 lip 2019 o 06:25 Alex Harui
>>     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >>     >     > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > Please update the wiki in a way that
>> the
>>     > next
>>     >     > person
>>     >     >     >> will know
>>     >     >     >>     > which
>>     >     >     >>     >     > 2FA
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > token to use.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > -Alex
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > On 7/19/19, 9:08 AM, "Piotr
>> Zarzycki" <
>>     >     >     >>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     > wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     So far so good. I'm on a step 3,
>> where
>>     > I need
>>     >     > build
>>     >     >     >>     > artifacts on
>>     >     >     >>     >     > my
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > sight
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     and compare them with what
>> Jenkins
>>     > produce.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     I will get back to that probably
>> on
>>     > Monday.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 1:40 PM
>> Piotr
>>     > Zarzycki <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Hi Alex,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Thanks it's working. I'm moving
>>     > forward
>>     >     > with that
>>     >     >     >> stuff
>>     >     >     >>     > let's
>>     >     >     >>     >     > see
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > how far
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > I go with it.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Piotr
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > pt., 19 lip 2019 o 05:49 Alex
>> Harui
>>     >     >     >>     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> I am using the token
>> generated this
>>     > way:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Fen%2Farticles%2Fcreating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-command-line&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=X5X8efqqzwvC1rxG4AwVnAZK6ThBKimPB3Nl61yGQFM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> There is no short code from
>> Google
>>     >     > Authenticator.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> -Alex
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> On 7/18/19, 8:46 AM, "Piotr
>>     > Zarzycki" <
>>     >     >     >>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     I'm using 2FA
>> authentication,
>>     > second
>>     >     > step
>>     >     >     >> for me is
>>     >     >     >>     > typing
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > short code
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> from
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     Google Authenticator
>>     > application. Do
>>     >     > you use
>>     >     >     >>     > something
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > different?
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     czw., 18 lip 2019 o 17:42
>> Alex
>>     > Harui
>>     >     >     >>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > I don't think git
>> version
>>     > matters.
>>     >     > Are you
>>     >     >     >> using
>>     >     >     >>     > your
>>     >     >     >>     >     > 2fa
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > token as
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> the
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > password? It should be a
>>     > really long
>>     >     >     >> sequence of
>>     >     >     >>     >     > characters.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Get Outlook for Android<
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=aXoDU8eCG50R2hjNTX5%2FdLIfILY932F86hCQ86aBwWU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     > ________________________________
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
>>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Sent: Thursday, July
>> 18, 2019
>>     >     > 7:43:44 AM
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > To:
>> dev@royale.apache.org
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Subject: Re: Discuss of
>>     > release steps
>>     >     >     >> preparation
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Maybe Git just should be
>>     > updated on
>>     >     >     >> Machine ? I
>>     >     >     >>     > see
>>     >     >     >>     >     > 2.15 and
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > there
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> is 2.22
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > already.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
>> 16:35 Piotr
>>     >     > Zarzycki <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > When I do git push -
>> I'm
>>     > getting
>>     >     > separate
>>     >     >     >>     > window with
>>     >     >     >>     >     > title
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> GitHub Login
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > -
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > where I can enter my
>>     >     > login/password. I'm
>>     >     >     >> doing
>>     >     >     >>     > that
>>     >     >     >>     >     > and in
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > the
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> next step
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > it
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > throws me an error in
>> the
>>     > console
>>     >     > - same
>>     >     >     >> what I
>>     >     >     >>     > have
>>     >     >     >>     >     > pasted
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > in
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> previous
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > email.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > I'm typing again
>> login and
>>     > password
>>     >     >     >> cause It's
>>     >     >     >>     > asking
>>     >     >     >>     >     > me as
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > you
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> can see
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > in
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > the previous email.
>> In the
>>     > results
>>     >     > I get:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > remote: Invalid
>> username or
>>     >     > password.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > fatal: Authentication
>> failed
>>     > for '
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=UrZ3i2tKBU53GUOU2sSnFdkibWycS06Gs%2BghnXXm8Qs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > '
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > Does your steps look
>> the
>>     > same ?
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
>> 16:31
>>     > Piotr
>>     >     > Zarzycki
>>     >     >     >> <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> I did that and I'm
>> getting
>>     > wrong
>>     >     >     >> password or
>>     >     >     >>     > user
>>     >     >     >>     >     > name, so
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > that
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> must be
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> different case. Let
>> me try
>>     > now
>>     >     > again.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o
>> 16:21
>>     > Alex
>>     >     > Harui
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> It is asking for
>> your
>>     > GitHub
>>     >     >     >> username.  Type
>>     >     >     >>     > it in
>>     >     >     >>     >     > and hit
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> enter, then
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> it will ask for your
>>     > GitHub 2FA
>>     >     >     >> token.  We
>>     >     >     >>     > don't
>>     >     >     >>     >     > store our
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> credentials
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > on
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the machine.
>>  That's why
>>     > the
>>     >     >     >> Succeeded email
>>     >     >     >>     > says
>>     >     >     >>     >     > you
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > will
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> need your
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > GH
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> credentials.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> HTH,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> -Alex
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> On 7/18/19, 7:06
>> AM, "Piotr
>>     >     > Zarzycki" <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     In the first
>> step I'm
>>     > getting
>>     >     >     >> following
>>     >     >     >>     > error
>>     >     >     >>     >     > during
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > an
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> attempt of
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> login:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     git push
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     fatal:
>>     > HttpRequestException
>>     >     >     >> encountered.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>        An error
>> occurred
>>     > while
>>     >     > sending
>>     >     >     >> the
>>     >     >     >>     > request.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Username for '
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=TLwC7zwvkxeJNyfG0Cffr1ma6Z8BaZnAyhHphJcDADI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> ':
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     There is being
>>     > suggestion
>>     >     > how to
>>     >     >     >> resolve
>>     >     >     >>     > it
>>     >     >     >>     >     > here [1],
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > but
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> I'm not
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> sure
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     whether I can
>> do that
>>     > on
>>     >     > remote PC
>>     >     >     >> ?
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     [1]
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     >
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcodeshare.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-solve-the-github-error-fatal-httprequestexception-encountered%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=7St0nBmiwOk%2FC11EquDqo8pznnr15MefTZyUJ9iQxBM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Piotr
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     czw., 18 lip
>> 2019 o
>>     > 15:06
>>     >     > Piotr
>>     >     >     >> Zarzycki <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Hi Alex,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > I'm getting
>> back to
>>     > that.
>>     >     > Again
>>     >     >     >> some
>>     >     >     >>     >     > questions:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > I think you
>> will
>>     > need to
>>     >     > set up
>>     >     >     >> your PC
>>     >     >     >>     > for
>>     >     >     >>     >     > most,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > if not
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> all, of
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the steps
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> in [1] in
>> order to
>>     >     >     >> compare/verify the
>>     >     >     >>     > output
>>     >     >     >>     >     > from
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > [2].
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Above means
>> that I
>>     > don't
>>     >     > need to
>>     >     >     >> setup
>>     >     >     >>     > my own
>>     >     >     >>     >     > PC
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > fully,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> but just
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> to be
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > able to build
>>     > project, so
>>     >     > could
>>     >     >     >> compare
>>     >     >     >>     > the
>>     >     >     >>     >     > results
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > of
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> build with
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> what
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Jenkins
>> produce ?
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > However you
>> are
>>     > saying
>>     >     > later
>>     >     >     >> that you
>>     >     >     >>     > didn't
>>     >     >     >>     >     > setup
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > step
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> where
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> there is
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > produced
>>     > dist/release
>>     >     > folder.
>>     >     >     >> What I
>>     >     >     >>     > got
>>     >     >     >>     >     > when I
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > launch
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> each of
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> those
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > step actually
>> at the
>>     > end ?
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Before you
>> answer me
>>     > I will
>>     >     >     >> study and
>>     >     >     >>     > launch
>>     >     >     >>     >     > each
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > of step
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> on
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> Jenkins to
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > see what will
>> happen.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Piotr
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > pon., 8 lip
>> 2019 o
>>     > 16:59
>>     >     > Piotr
>>     >     >     >> Zarzycki
>>     >     >     >>     > <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> Hi,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> I'm occupied
>> till
>>     > at least
>>     >     >     >> Wednesday
>>     >     >     >>     > with
>>     >     >     >>     >     > important
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> task, so I
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> hope to
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> look into
>> release on
>>     >     > Thursday.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> Thanks,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> Piotr
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> sob., 6 lip
>> 2019 o
>>     > 17:23
>>     >     > Alex
>>     >     >     >> Harui
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> napisał(a):
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> On 7/6/19,
>> 7:22 AM,
>>     >     > "Piotr
>>     >     >     >> Zarzycki" <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> wrote:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     Hi Alex,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     I
>> finally sat
>>     > down
>>     >     > and
>>     >     >     >> started to
>>     >     >     >>     > read
>>     >     >     >>     >     > all
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> instructions
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> [1][2]
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> related to
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     RM job.
>> I feel
>>     > lost
>>     >     > with
>>     >     >     >> that a
>>     >     >     >>     > bit, so
>>     >     >     >>     >     > I
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > wanted to
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> confirm
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> what I
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> just
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     read -
>> correct
>>     > me if
>>     >     > I'm
>>     >     >     >> wrong
>>     >     >     >>     > with
>>     >     >     >>     >     > anything.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     1. First
>>     > instruction
>>     >     > [1] is
>>     >     >     >>     > actually
>>     >     >     >>     >     > steps
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > which I
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> would be
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> doing on
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> my PC,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     but
>> automatic
>>     > release
>>     >     >     >> process
>>     >     >     >>     > actually
>>     >     >     >>     >     > covers
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > it
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> for me.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     2. I
>> still
>>     > have to
>>     >     > do at
>>     >     >     >> least
>>     >     >     >>     > some of
>>     >     >     >>     >     > the
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > steps
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> from [1],
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> but only
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> to
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>  compare/verify
>>     >     > output from
>>     >     >     >> [2]
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> I think you
>> will
>>     > need to
>>     >     > set
>>     >     >     >> up your
>>     >     >     >>     > PC for
>>     >     >     >>     >     > most,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > if
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> not all,
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > of
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> steps in
>> [1] in
>>     > order to
>>     >     >     >>     > compare/verify the
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > output from
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> [2].  I
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> don't know
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> for sure
>> because I
>>     > did
>>     >     > not
>>     >     >     >> want to
>>     >     >     >>     > take the
>>     >     >     >>     >     > time
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > to try
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> to set
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> up a new
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> PC.  I only
>> had
>>     > time to
>>     >     > do the
>>     >     >     >>     > testing of
>>     >     >     >>     >     > the
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> compare/verify
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> steps on a
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> Mac.  I want
>>     > others to
>>     >     >     >> understand how
>>     >     >     >>     > this
>>     >     >     >>     >     > process
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> works and
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > make
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> improvements
>>     > themselves
>>     >     > by
>>     >     >     >> debugging
>>     >     >     >>     > when
>>     >     >     >>     >     > things
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > don't
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> go
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> right.  This
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>> should not
>> be
>>     > something
>>     >     > that
>>     >     >     >> only I
>>     >     >     >>     > know
>>     >     >     >>     >     > how to
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     > fix.
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     There
>> is a
>>     > sentence
>>     >     > which
>>     >     >     >> saying:
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     "The
>> released
>>     >     > artifacts
>>     >     >     >> should
>>     >     >     >>     > end up on
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> dist/release
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>     <
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >     >
>>     >     >     >>     >
>>     >     >     >>
>>     >     >
>>     > <
>> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=M%2F0iYuQ35fAI5wedinzFq1UJrR%2Bi5fRUZv7IQVBxCoo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*

Reply via email to