If your folder with artifacts is in ~/temp/releasesteps - What do you type
when script asking you about ?
get-artifact-folder:
[input] Enter the temporary folder to store the downloaded artifacts:
wt., 13 sie 2019 o 22:20 Alex Harui <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> I'm not sure you should skip the uploading. I'm not sure where typedefs
> and asjs will get its compiler artifacts if they haven't been uploaded.
>
> The output says that it is looking in the following folder for artifacts:
>
>
> d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\royale096\artifacts\archive\target\checkout\release-dir
>
> For me, my temp folder is:
>
> ~/temp/releasesteps
>
> And the artifacts are in:
>
> artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir
>
> There seems to be another level in there for you (sources\royale096).
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 8/13/19, 11:31 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sorry about that. I was going trough the steps but I have left steps
> for
> signing artifacts and uploading them at the end.
>
> When for all 3 repos I had build, comparison and sign in works I tried
> upload it using provided instructions.
>
> If you are not seeing any suspicious in that log I need to understand
> more
> why actually upload wasn't triggered.
>
> Artifacts were definitely generated correctly.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 5:33 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what warnings you are referring to.
> >
> > If you look at releasesteps.xml, you can see that it is using Maven's
> > wagon:upload goal to upload from a particular folder. Are there
> jars in
> > that folder (or its subfolders)? Examine the output of the previous
> Ant
> > release steps for step 003 to see if the source package built
> correctly and
> > binary matched. If the previous steps were successful then the
> upload
> > should be picking up those artifacts.
> >
> > I'm a bit confused that you got to step 11 according to email but
> now are
> > saying you never got past step 3.
> >
> > Also, I do not recommend using a temporary folder inside your working
> > copy. It will be far safer to specify an absolute path to a folder
> outside
> > of your working copy. Find a good place to add that to the wiki
> > instructions.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 8/13/19, 2:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > Thanks for information. I went today trough the steps again. I
> reached
> > point where I'm trying to upload artifacts, but script keep
> saying me
> > that
> > there is nothing to upload. Is it because of those warnings at
> the
> > beginnings ? [1]
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fzvxoi&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110163174&sdata=4hzhaPPkBXhC4ACCdnZ1GEym6MRSVVsIhisRLT8vvjs%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pon., 12 sie 2019 o 19:31 Alex Harui <[email protected]>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Getting back to this.
> > >
> > > You can start a vote on the results. If we get this process
> > working, it
> > > should be relatively easy for others to do releases as well so
> we
> > will
> > > hopefully do releases more often and it won't matter if
> someone's
> > recent
> > > changes made it into the RC or not.
> > >
> > > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being
> > created
> > > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and
> ask the
> > RM to
> > > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the
> develop
> > > branch.
> > >
> > > The only build output I could find on the server for the 7/24
> both
> > show
> > > that the date/time given back in step 009 was invalid. As you
> can
> > see from
> > > the exception, Java is parsing the string and the expectation
> is
> > that the
> > > string you enter conforms to the Java format of:
> > >
> > > MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
> > >
> > > The documentation for this format is in the Java
> documentation. As I
> > > explained in an earlier reply, "Z" stands for timezone and you
> must
> > supply
> > > one. It shouldn't matter which one you supply, I use the one
> I'm
> > in, but
> > > again, the whole point of this exercise is to find bugs and
> improve
> > > documentation of the process. In your most recent attempt,
> you did
> > not
> > > specify a timezone. In the one prior, you did not supply a
> year or
> > a space
> > > between date and hour. Please update the documentation or the
> > instructions
> > > in the Jenkins jobs to make it more clear that you have to be
> > accurate in
> > > specifying the date.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 7/24/19, 9:01 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Btw. Once I finish steps - Can I publish artefacts and
> start RC1
> > vote
> > > on
> > > dev ? Does anything I should know at the end which is not
> > mention ?
> > >
> > >
> > > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:59 Piotr Zarzycki <
> > [email protected]>
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > By compare to dypedefs step - do you mean that I should
> look
> > into
> > > Jenkins
> > > > configuration of that steps or something else ?
> > > >
> > > > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:56 Alex Harui
> <[email protected]>
> > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > >> Hi Piotr,
> > > >>
> > > >> You can compare the output from previous builds and
> also the
> > > typedefs
> > > >> build configuration because both successfully used the
> date
> > > format. The
> > > >> Java documentation says that "Z" is for timezone. It
> > shouldn't
> > > matter
> > > >> which one you use, but in the typedefs you hadn't
> specified
> > one at
> > > all.
> > > >>
> > > >> It looks like in this case extra quotes are wrapped
> around
> > the date.
> > > >> You'll have to compare against the typedefs steps to
> see why
> > that's
> > > >> happening.
> > > >>
> > > >> HTH,
> > > >> -Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> On 7/24/19, 3:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Alex,
> > > >>
> > > >> I was able to overcome issue with date for typedefs.
> > Instruction
> > > >> there is
> > > >> saying:
> > > >>
> > > >> MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
> > > >> > Where MM/dd/yy is the US-formatted date and HH:MM
> is a
> > faked
> > > time to
> > > >> > encode the release version such as:
> > > >> > 2/10/19 9:06 -0800
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I have typed 7/24/2019 HH (I don't remember what was
> > that) and
> > > -0800
> > > >> - This
> > > >> part I completely do not understand - what is for
> there
> > minus ?
> > > Can
> > > >> you
> > > >> send exact example of what I should put there ?
> > > >>
> > > >> What's more I have went trough forward and in steps
> > related to
> > > >> royale-asjs
> > > >> I see that typing either
> > > >>
> > > >> 7/24/19 9:06 -0800 or just 7/24/19 9:06 causes an
> > exception
> > > with
> > > >> following
> > > >> message:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> [INFO] COMPC
> > > >> [INFO] Loading configuration:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_011\target\checkout\frameworks\themes\Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Yellow-Theme\target\compile-swf-config.xml
> > > >> [INFO]
> > > >> [INFO] java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date:
> > ""7/24/19
> > > 9:06""
> > > >> [INFO] at
> > java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
> > > >> [INFO] at
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.processFileEntry(SWCTarget.java:330)
> > > >> [INFO] at
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.addFileEntriesToSWC(SWCTarget.java:291)
> > > >>
> > > >> It looks like there are some additional parentheses
> -
> > Maybe
> > > it's an
> > > >> issue.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> wt., 23 lip 2019 o 18:56 Alex Harui
> > <[email protected]>
> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Piotr,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > What differences did you see? I downloaded the
> two
> > SWCs and
> > > the
> > > >> only
> > > >> > difference I saw was the timestamps in the
> catalog.xml
> > in the
> > > SWCs.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > The timestamps are set by the SWCDATE parameter
> in Step
> > 005.
> > > The
> > > >> log
> > > >> > indicates that you did not specify a timezone so
> maybe
> > that's
> > > why
> > > >> the
> > > >> > timestamps are not matching up. Please update the
> > > instructions so
> > > >> that
> > > >> > future RMs do not forget to include a timezone.
> The
> > example
> > > >> pattern that
> > > >> > Jenkins should show should include a timezone.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > You will have to remove the tag and revert any
> commits
> > from
> > > steps
> > > >> 5, 6,
> > > >> > and 7 before re-running step 5.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > HTH,
> > > >> > -Alex
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 7/23/19, 6:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hi Alex,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks! I have moved forward and in step 7 -
> > related to
> > > >> typedefs during
> > > >> > build on my local machine I got mismatch
> error [1].
> > What
> > > could
> > > >> actually
> > > >> > happen? I did compare some files inside those
> two
> > swc and
> > > they
> > > >> are
> > > >> > indeed
> > > >> > different - I have used Total Command to
> compare
> > them.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > When I'm starting steps related to typedefs -
> first
> > step
> > > >> actually
> > > >> > checkout
> > > >> > fresh sources ? I'm wondering whether Jenkins
> > checkout
> > > them
> > > >> earlier
> > > >> > when I
> > > >> > started one of the step before typedefs
> steps? This
> > those
> > > 2
> > > >> files [2]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1]
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbren2&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=%2Ba9NxCNjcO08f8ZbgePErL1SZvxaD6lpSn6DsQbr8Ik%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > [2]
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2icJBcCsTMZrzfnTTuQ%3Fe%3DNwidMg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=ClD%2BCcEcZ1%2BzRznkEpiECFV7x%2FYjwVKxUs3%2Bcp9Fay0%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> > Piotr
> > > >> >
> > > >> > wt., 23 lip 2019 o 07:31 Alex Harui
> > > <[email protected]>
> > > >> > napisał(a):
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > The email with the subject "Release Step 003
> > Succeeded"
> > > says:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > 1. If you are releasing the utils jars
> > > (compiler-jburg-types
> > > >> and
> > > >> > > compiler-build-tools), Run:
> > > >> > > ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
> > -Dutils=true
> > > >> > > -Drelease.version=0.9.6
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > It looks like you are not using the
> -Dutils=true.
> > > Please
> > > >> improve the
> > > >> > > email so future RMs will not miss that
> parameter.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > -Alex
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On 7/22/19, 9:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Hi Alex,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > I have made adjustment to
> documentation. I'm
> > on
> > > step 3
> > > >> where I
> > > >> > need
> > > >> > > build
> > > >> > > on my end sources. I have run on my PC
> this:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
> > > >> -Drelease.version=0.9.6
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > It downloads sources and maven
> artifacts, but
> > it
> > > also
> > > >> tried
> > > >> > build them
> > > >> > > automatically as I understa. I got
> error [1]
> > - it
> > > >> understandable
> > > >> > cause
> > > >> > > there is no 1.0.0 compiler-jburg-types.
> > Should I on
> > > my
> > > >> own build
> > > >> > > first compiler-jburg-types with 1.0.0
> to have
> > stuff
> > > in
> > > >> local
> > > >> > cache or
> > > >> > > should I made something else ?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > [1]
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fa10nq&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=4dlbh3xDClPiFNz%2BIYPy2X8QQvAsVuAaIUcuKZZVcSw%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > Piotr
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > sob., 20 lip 2019 o 06:25 Alex Harui
> > > >> <[email protected]>
> > > >> > > napisał(a):
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Please update the wiki in a way that
> the
> > next
> > > person
> > > >> will know
> > > >> > which
> > > >> > > 2FA
> > > >> > > > token to use.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > -Alex
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On 7/19/19, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
> <
> > > >> > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > So far so good. I'm on a step 3,
> where
> > I need
> > > build
> > > >> > artifacts on
> > > >> > > my
> > > >> > > > sight
> > > >> > > > and compare them with what Jenkins
> > produce.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I will get back to that probably
> on
> > Monday.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 1:40 PM
> Piotr
> > Zarzycki <
> > > >> > > > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Thanks it's working. I'm moving
> > forward
> > > with that
> > > >> stuff
> > > >> > let's
> > > >> > > see
> > > >> > > > how far
> > > >> > > > > I go with it.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Piotr
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > pt., 19 lip 2019 o 05:49 Alex
> Harui
> > > >> > <[email protected]>
> > > >> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >> I am using the token generated
> this
> > way:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Fen%2Farticles%2Fcreating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-command-line&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=X5X8efqqzwvC1rxG4AwVnAZK6ThBKimPB3Nl61yGQFM%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> There is no short code from
> Google
> > > Authenticator.
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> -Alex
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> On 7/18/19, 8:46 AM, "Piotr
> > Zarzycki" <
> > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> I'm using 2FA
> authentication,
> > second
> > > step
> > > >> for me is
> > > >> > typing
> > > >> > > > short code
> > > >> > > > >> from
> > > >> > > > >> Google Authenticator
> > application. Do
> > > you use
> > > >> > something
> > > >> > > > different?
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o 17:42
> Alex
> > Harui
> > > >> > > <[email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > I don't think git version
> > matters.
> > > Are you
> > > >> using
> > > >> > your
> > > >> > > 2fa
> > > >> > > > token as
> > > >> > > > >> the
> > > >> > > > >> > password? It should be a
> > really long
> > > >> sequence of
> > > >> > > characters.
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > Get Outlook for Android<
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=aXoDU8eCG50R2hjNTX5%2FdLIfILY932F86hCQ86aBwWU%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > ________________________________
> > > >> > > > >> > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > Sent: Thursday, July 18,
> 2019
> > > 7:43:44 AM
> > > >> > > > >> > To:
> [email protected]
> > > >> > > > >> > Subject: Re: Discuss of
> > release steps
> > > >> preparation
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > Maybe Git just should be
> > updated on
> > > >> Machine ? I
> > > >> > see
> > > >> > > 2.15 and
> > > >> > > > there
> > > >> > > > >> is 2.22
> > > >> > > > >> > already.
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
> 16:35 Piotr
> > > Zarzycki <
> > > >> > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >> > > When I do git push -
> I'm
> > getting
> > > separate
> > > >> > window with
> > > >> > > title
> > > >> > > > >> GitHub Login
> > > >> > > > >> > -
> > > >> > > > >> > > where I can enter my
> > > login/password. I'm
> > > >> doing
> > > >> > that
> > > >> > > and in
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > >> next step
> > > >> > > > >> > it
> > > >> > > > >> > > throws me an error in
> the
> > console
> > > - same
> > > >> what I
> > > >> > have
> > > >> > > pasted
> > > >> > > > in
> > > >> > > > >> previous
> > > >> > > > >> > > email.
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > I'm typing again login
> and
> > password
> > > >> cause It's
> > > >> > asking
> > > >> > > me as
> > > >> > > > you
> > > >> > > > >> can see
> > > >> > > > >> > in
> > > >> > > > >> > > the previous email. In
> the
> > results
> > > I get:
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > remote: Invalid
> username or
> > > password.
> > > >> > > > >> > > fatal: Authentication
> failed
> > for '
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=UrZ3i2tKBU53GUOU2sSnFdkibWycS06Gs%2BghnXXm8Qs%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > > > >> > '
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > Does your steps look
> the
> > same ?
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
> 16:31
> > Piotr
> > > Zarzycki
> > > >> <
> > > >> > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > > napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > >> > >> I did that and I'm
> getting
> > wrong
> > > >> password or
> > > >> > user
> > > >> > > name, so
> > > >> > > > that
> > > >> > > > >> must be
> > > >> > > > >> > >> different case. Let
> me try
> > now
> > > again.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o
> 16:21
> > Alex
> > > Harui
> > > >> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > >> napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >> > >>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> It is asking for your
> > GitHub
> > > >> username. Type
> > > >> > it in
> > > >> > > and hit
> > > >> > > > >> enter, then
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> it will ask for your
> > GitHub 2FA
> > > >> token. We
> > > >> > don't
> > > >> > > store our
> > > >> > > > >> credentials
> > > >> > > > >> > on
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> the machine.
> That's why
> > the
> > > >> Succeeded email
> > > >> > says
> > > >> > > you
> > > >> > > > will
> > > >> > > > >> need your
> > > >> > > > >> > GH
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> credentials.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> HTH,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> -Alex
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> On 7/18/19, 7:06 AM,
> "Piotr
> > > Zarzycki" <
> > > >> > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> In the first
> step I'm
> > getting
> > > >> following
> > > >> > error
> > > >> > > during
> > > >> > > > an
> > > >> > > > >> attempt of
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> login:
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> git push
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> fatal:
> > HttpRequestException
> > > >> encountered.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> An error
> occurred
> > while
> > > sending
> > > >> the
> > > >> > request.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Username for '
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=TLwC7zwvkxeJNyfG0Cffr1ma6Z8BaZnAyhHphJcDADI%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> ':
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> There is being
> > suggestion
> > > how to
> > > >> resolve
> > > >> > it
> > > >> > > here [1],
> > > >> > > > but
> > > >> > > > >> I'm not
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> sure
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> whether I can do
> that
> > on
> > > remote PC
> > > >> ?
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> [1]
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcodeshare.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-solve-the-github-error-fatal-httprequestexception-encountered%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=7St0nBmiwOk%2FC11EquDqo8pznnr15MefTZyUJ9iQxBM%3D&reserved=0
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Piotr
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> czw., 18 lip
> 2019 o
> > 15:06
> > > Piotr
> > > >> Zarzycki <
> > > >> > > > >> >
> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > I'm getting
> back to
> > that.
> > > Again
> > > >> some
> > > >> > > questions:
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > I think you
> will
> > need to
> > > set up
> > > >> your PC
> > > >> > for
> > > >> > > most,
> > > >> > > > if not
> > > >> > > > >> all, of
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> the steps
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> in [1] in
> order to
> > > >> compare/verify the
> > > >> > output
> > > >> > > from
> > > >> > > > [2].
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Above means
> that I
> > don't
> > > need to
> > > >> setup
> > > >> > my own
> > > >> > > PC
> > > >> > > > fully,
> > > >> > > > >> but just
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> to be
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > able to build
> > project, so
> > > could
> > > >> compare
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > results
> > > >> > > > of
> > > >> > > > >> build with
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> what
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Jenkins
> produce ?
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > However you are
> > saying
> > > later
> > > >> that you
> > > >> > didn't
> > > >> > > setup
> > > >> > > > step
> > > >> > > > >> where
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> there is
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > produced
> > dist/release
> > > folder.
> > > >> What I
> > > >> > got
> > > >> > > when I
> > > >> > > > launch
> > > >> > > > >> each of
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> those
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > step actually
> at the
> > end ?
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Before you
> answer me
> > I will
> > > >> study and
> > > >> > launch
> > > >> > > each
> > > >> > > > of step
> > > >> > > > >> on
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> Jenkins to
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > see what will
> happen.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Thanks,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > Piotr
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > pon., 8 lip
> 2019 o
> > 16:59
> > > Piotr
> > > >> Zarzycki
> > > >> > <
> > > >> > > > >> >
> [email protected]
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> > napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Hi,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> I'm occupied
> till
> > at least
> > > >> Wednesday
> > > >> > with
> > > >> > > important
> > > >> > > > >> task, so I
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> hope to
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> look into
> release on
> > > Thursday.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Thanks,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> Piotr
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> sob., 6 lip
> 2019 o
> > 17:23
> > > Alex
> > > >> Harui
> > > >> > > > >> <[email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >> napisał(a):
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> On 7/6/19,
> 7:22 AM,
> > > "Piotr
> > > >> Zarzycki" <
> > > >> > > > >> >
> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> wrote:
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> I
> finally sat
> > down
> > > and
> > > >> started to
> > > >> > read
> > > >> > > all
> > > >> > > > >> instructions
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> [1][2]
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> related to
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> RM job.
> I feel
> > lost
> > > with
> > > >> that a
> > > >> > bit, so
> > > >> > > I
> > > >> > > > wanted to
> > > >> > > > >> confirm
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> what I
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> just
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> read -
> correct
> > me if
> > > I'm
> > > >> wrong
> > > >> > with
> > > >> > > anything.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> 1. First
> > instruction
> > > [1] is
> > > >> > actually
> > > >> > > steps
> > > >> > > > which I
> > > >> > > > >> would be
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> doing on
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> my PC,
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> but
> automatic
> > release
> > > >> process
> > > >> > actually
> > > >> > > covers
> > > >> > > > it
> > > >> > > > >> for me.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> 2. I
> still
> > have to
> > > do at
> > > >> least
> > > >> > some of
> > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > steps
> > > >> > > > >> from [1],
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> but only
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> to
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> compare/verify
> > > output from
> > > >> [2]
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> I think you
> will
> > need to
> > > set
> > > >> up your
> > > >> > PC for
> > > >> > > most,
> > > >> > > > if
> > > >> > > > >> not all,
> > > >> > > > >> > of
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> the
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> steps in [1]
> in
> > order to
> > > >> > compare/verify the
> > > >> > > > output from
> > > >> > > > >> [2]. I
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> don't know
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> for sure
> because I
> > did
> > > not
> > > >> want to
> > > >> > take the
> > > >> > > time
> > > >> > > > to try
> > > >> > > > >> to set
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> up a new
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> PC. I only
> had
> > time to
> > > do the
> > > >> > testing of
> > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > >> compare/verify
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> steps on a
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> Mac. I want
> > others to
> > > >> understand how
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > > process
> > > >> > > > >> works and
> > > >> > > > >> > make
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> improvements
> > themselves
> > > by
> > > >> debugging
> > > >> > when
> > > >> > > things
> > > >> > > > don't
> > > >> > > > >> go
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> right. This
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> should not be
> > something
> > > that
> > > >> only I
> > > >> > know
> > > >> > > how to
> > > >> > > > fix.
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> There is
> a
> > sentence
> > > which
> > > >> saying:
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> "The
> released
> > > artifacts
> > > >> should
> > > >> > end up on
> > > >> > > > >> dist/release
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>> <
> > > >> > > > >> > >>> >>>
> > > >> > > > >> > >>>
> > > >> > > > >> >
> > > >> > > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> > <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Frelease%2Froyale%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&sdata=M%2F0iYuQ35fAI5wedinzFq1UJrR%2Bi5fRUZv7IQVBxCoo%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
