Wow that is good point. I think if build of asjs is being done by Maven it
will be taken from 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT I think so. It definitely won't use
staged compiler - You need to point such stuff explicitly using settings.xml

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 10:20 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:

> I'm not sure you should skip the uploading.  I'm not sure where typedefs
> and asjs will get its compiler artifacts if they haven't been uploaded.
>
> The output says that it is looking in the following folder for artifacts:
>
>
> d:\Work\royale-sources\royale-compiler\royale096\sources\royale096\artifacts\archive\target\checkout\release-dir
>
> For me, my temp folder is:
>
>   ~/temp/releasesteps
>
> And the artifacts are in:
>
>   artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir
>
> There seems to be another level in there for you (sources\royale096).
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 8/13/19, 11:31 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Sorry about that. I was going trough the steps but I have left steps
> for
>     signing artifacts and uploading them at the end.
>
>     When for all 3 repos I had build, comparison and sign in works I tried
>     upload it using provided instructions.
>
>     If you are not seeing any suspicious in that log I need to understand
> more
>     why actually upload wasn't triggered.
>
>     Artifacts were definitely generated correctly.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Piotr
>
>     On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 5:33 PM Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>     > I'm not sure what warnings you are referring to.
>     >
>     > If you look at releasesteps.xml, you can see that it is using Maven's
>     > wagon:upload goal to upload from a particular folder.  Are there
> jars in
>     > that folder (or its subfolders)?  Examine the output of the previous
> Ant
>     > release steps for step 003 to see if the source package built
> correctly and
>     > binary matched.  If the previous steps were successful then the
> upload
>     > should be picking up those artifacts.
>     >
>     > I'm a bit confused that you got to step 11 according to email but
> now are
>     > saying you never got past step 3.
>     >
>     > Also, I do not recommend using a temporary folder inside your working
>     > copy.  It will be far safer to specify an absolute path to a folder
> outside
>     > of your working copy.  Find a good place to add that to the wiki
>     > instructions.
>     >
>     > HTH,
>     > -Alex
>     >
>     > On 8/13/19, 2:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Hi Alex,
>     >
>     >     Thanks for information. I went today trough the steps again. I
> reached
>     >     point where I'm trying to upload artifacts, but script keep
> saying me
>     > that
>     >     there is nothing to upload. Is it because of those warnings at
> the
>     >     beginnings ? [1]
>     >
>     >     [1]
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fzvxoi&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110163174&amp;sdata=4hzhaPPkBXhC4ACCdnZ1GEym6MRSVVsIhisRLT8vvjs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >     Piotr
>     >
>     >     pon., 12 sie 2019 o 19:31 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     > napisał(a):
>     >
>     >     > Getting back to this.
>     >     >
>     >     > You can start a vote on the results.  If we get this process
>     > working, it
>     >     > should be relatively easy for others to do releases as well so
> we
>     > will
>     >     > hopefully do releases more often and it won't matter if
> someone's
>     > recent
>     >     > changes made it into the RC or not.
>     >     >
>     >     > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being
>     > created
>     >     > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and
> ask the
>     > RM to
>     >     > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the
> develop
>     >     > branch.
>     >     >
>     >     > The only build output I could find on the server for the 7/24
> both
>     > show
>     >     > that the date/time given back in step 009 was invalid.  As you
> can
>     > see from
>     >     > the exception, Java is parsing the string and the expectation
> is
>     > that the
>     >     > string you enter conforms to the Java format of:
>     >     >
>     >     > MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
>     >     >
>     >     > The documentation for this format is in the Java
> documentation.  As I
>     >     > explained in an earlier reply, "Z" stands for timezone and you
> must
>     > supply
>     >     > one.  It shouldn't matter which one you supply, I use the one
> I'm
>     > in, but
>     >     > again, the whole point of this exercise is to find bugs and
> improve
>     >     > documentation of the process.  In your most recent attempt,
> you did
>     > not
>     >     > specify a timezone.  In the one prior, you did not supply a
> year or
>     > a space
>     >     > between date and hour.  Please update the documentation or the
>     > instructions
>     >     > in the Jenkins jobs to make it more clear that you have to be
>     > accurate in
>     >     > specifying the date.
>     >     >
>     >     > HTH,
>     >     > -Alex
>     >     >
>     >     > On 7/24/19, 9:01 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     > wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >     Btw. Once I finish steps - Can I publish artefacts and
> start RC1
>     > vote
>     >     > on
>     >     >     dev ? Does anything I should know at the end which is not
>     > mention ?
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >     śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:59 Piotr Zarzycki <
>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     napisał(a):
>     >     >
>     >     >     > By compare to dypedefs step - do you mean that I should
> look
>     > into
>     >     > Jenkins
>     >     >     > configuration of that steps or something else ?
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > śr., 24 lip 2019 o 17:56 Alex Harui
> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >> Hi Piotr,
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> You can compare the output from previous builds and
> also the
>     >     > typedefs
>     >     >     >> build configuration because both successfully used the
> date
>     >     > format.  The
>     >     >     >> Java documentation says that "Z" is for timezone.  It
>     > shouldn't
>     >     > matter
>     >     >     >> which one you use, but in the typedefs you hadn't
> specified
>     > one at
>     >     > all.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> It looks like in this case extra quotes are wrapped
> around
>     > the date.
>     >     >     >> You'll have to compare against the typedefs steps to
> see why
>     > that's
>     >     >     >> happening.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> HTH,
>     >     >     >> -Alex
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >> On 7/24/19, 3:53 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     > wrote:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     Hi Alex,
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     I was able to overcome issue with date for typedefs.
>     > Instruction
>     >     >     >> there is
>     >     >     >>     saying:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     MM/dd/yy HH:mm Z
>     >     >     >>     > Where MM/dd/yy is the US-formatted date and HH:MM
> is a
>     > faked
>     >     > time to
>     >     >     >>     > encode the release version such as:
>     >     >     >>     > 2/10/19 9:06 -0800
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     I have typed 7/24/2019 HH (I don't remember what was
>     > that) and
>     >     > -0800
>     >     >     >> - This
>     >     >     >>     part I completely do not understand - what is for
> there
>     > minus ?
>     >     > Can
>     >     >     >> you
>     >     >     >>     send exact example of what I should put there ?
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     What's more I have went trough forward and in steps
>     > related to
>     >     >     >> royale-asjs
>     >     >     >>     I see that typing either
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     7/24/19 9:06 -0800 or  just 7/24/19 9:06 causes an
>     > exception
>     >     > with
>     >     >     >> following
>     >     >     >>     message:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     [INFO] COMPC
>     >     >     >>     [INFO] Loading configuration:
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> C:\jenkins\workspace\Royale_Release_Step_011\target\checkout\frameworks\themes\Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Yellow-Theme\target\compile-swf-config.xml
>     >     >     >>     [INFO]
>     >     >     >>     [INFO] java.text.ParseException: Unparseable date:
>     > ""7/24/19
>     >     > 9:06""
>     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
>     > java.text.DateFormat.parse(DateFormat.java:366)
>     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.processFileEntry(SWCTarget.java:330)
>     >     >     >>     [INFO]      at
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> org.apache.royale.compiler.internal.targets.SWCTarget.addFileEntriesToSWC(SWCTarget.java:291)
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     It looks like there are some additional parentheses
> -
>     > Maybe
>     >     > it's an
>     >     >     >> issue.
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     Thanks,
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     Piotr
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     wt., 23 lip 2019 o 18:56 Alex Harui
>     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >> napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     > Hi Piotr,
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     > What differences did you see?  I downloaded the
> two
>     > SWCs and
>     >     > the
>     >     >     >> only
>     >     >     >>     > difference I saw was the timestamps in the
> catalog.xml
>     > in the
>     >     > SWCs.
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     > The timestamps are set by the SWCDATE parameter
> in Step
>     > 005.
>     >     > The
>     >     >     >> log
>     >     >     >>     > indicates that you did not specify a timezone so
> maybe
>     > that's
>     >     > why
>     >     >     >> the
>     >     >     >>     > timestamps are not matching up.  Please update the
>     >     > instructions so
>     >     >     >> that
>     >     >     >>     > future RMs do not forget to include a timezone.
> The
>     > example
>     >     >     >> pattern that
>     >     >     >>     > Jenkins should show should include a timezone.
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     > You will have to remove the tag and revert any
> commits
>     > from
>     >     > steps
>     >     >     >> 5, 6,
>     >     >     >>     > and 7 before re-running step 5.
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     > HTH,
>     >     >     >>     > -Alex
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     > On 7/23/19, 6:57 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >> wrote:
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     Hi Alex,
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     Thanks! I have moved forward and in step 7 -
>     > related to
>     >     >     >> typedefs during
>     >     >     >>     >     build on my local machine I got mismatch
> error [1].
>     > What
>     >     > could
>     >     >     >> actually
>     >     >     >>     >     happen? I did compare some files inside those
> two
>     > swc and
>     >     > they
>     >     >     >> are
>     >     >     >>     > indeed
>     >     >     >>     >     different - I have used Total Command to
> compare
>     > them.
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     When I'm starting steps related to typedefs -
> first
>     > step
>     >     >     >> actually
>     >     >     >>     > checkout
>     >     >     >>     >     fresh sources ? I'm wondering whether Jenkins
>     > checkout
>     >     > them
>     >     >     >> earlier
>     >     >     >>     > when I
>     >     >     >>     >     started one of the step before typedefs
> steps? This
>     > those
>     >     > 2
>     >     >     >> files [2]
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     [1]
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fbren2&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=%2Ba9NxCNjcO08f8ZbgePErL1SZvxaD6lpSn6DsQbr8Ik%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     [2]
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F1drv.ms%2Fu%2Fs!ApVpLyjpHDC2icJBcCsTMZrzfnTTuQ%3Fe%3DNwidMg&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=ClD%2BCcEcZ1%2BzRznkEpiECFV7x%2FYjwVKxUs3%2Bcp9Fay0%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     Thanks,
>     >     >     >>     >     Piotr
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     wt., 23 lip 2019 o 07:31 Alex Harui
>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     > Hi Piotr,
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     > The email with the subject "Release Step 003
>     > Succeeded"
>     >     > says:
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     > 1. If you are releasing the utils jars
>     >     > (compiler-jburg-types
>     >     >     >> and
>     >     >     >>     >     > compiler-build-tools), Run:
>     >     >     >>     >     >   ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
>     > -Dutils=true
>     >     >     >>     >     > -Drelease.version=0.9.6
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     > It looks like you are not using the
> -Dutils=true.
>     >     > Please
>     >     >     >> improve the
>     >     >     >>     >     > email so future RMs will not miss that
> parameter.
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     > Thanks,
>     >     >     >>     >     > -Alex
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     > On 7/22/19, 9:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     > wrote:
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     Hi Alex,
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     I have made adjustment to
> documentation. I'm
>     > on
>     >     > step 3
>     >     >     >> where I
>     >     >     >>     > need
>     >     >     >>     >     > build
>     >     >     >>     >     >     on my end sources. I have run on my PC
> this:
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     ant -f releasesteps.xml Release_Step_003
>     >     >     >> -Drelease.version=0.9.6
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     It downloads sources and maven
> artifacts, but
>     > it
>     >     > also
>     >     >     >> tried
>     >     >     >>     > build them
>     >     >     >>     >     >     automatically as I understa. I got
> error [1]
>     > - it
>     >     >     >> understandable
>     >     >     >>     > cause
>     >     >     >>     >     >     there is no 1.0.0 compiler-jburg-types.
>     > Should I on
>     >     > my
>     >     >     >> own build
>     >     >     >>     >     >     first compiler-jburg-types with 1.0.0
> to have
>     > stuff
>     >     > in
>     >     >     >> local
>     >     >     >>     > cache or
>     >     >     >>     >     >     should I made something else ?
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     [1]
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fa10nq&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=4dlbh3xDClPiFNz%2BIYPy2X8QQvAsVuAaIUcuKZZVcSw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     Thanks,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     Piotr
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     sob., 20 lip 2019 o 06:25 Alex Harui
>     >     >     >> <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>     >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > Please update the wiki in a way that
> the
>     > next
>     >     > person
>     >     >     >> will know
>     >     >     >>     > which
>     >     >     >>     >     > 2FA
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > token to use.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > Thanks,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > -Alex
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > On 7/19/19, 9:08 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"
> <
>     >     >     >>     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     > wrote:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     So far so good. I'm on a step 3,
> where
>     > I need
>     >     > build
>     >     >     >>     > artifacts on
>     >     >     >>     >     > my
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > sight
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     and compare them with what Jenkins
>     > produce.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     I will get back to that probably
> on
>     > Monday.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 1:40 PM
> Piotr
>     > Zarzycki <
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     wrote:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Hi Alex,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Thanks it's working. I'm moving
>     > forward
>     >     > with that
>     >     >     >> stuff
>     >     >     >>     > let's
>     >     >     >>     >     > see
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > how far
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > I go with it.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > Piotr
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     > pt., 19 lip 2019 o 05:49 Alex
> Harui
>     >     >     >>     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> I am using the token generated
> this
>     > way:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhelp.github.com%2Fen%2Farticles%2Fcreating-a-personal-access-token-for-the-command-line&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=X5X8efqqzwvC1rxG4AwVnAZK6ThBKimPB3Nl61yGQFM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> There is no short code from
> Google
>     >     > Authenticator.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> -Alex
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> On 7/18/19, 8:46 AM, "Piotr
>     > Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >>     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > wrote:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     I'm using 2FA
> authentication,
>     > second
>     >     > step
>     >     >     >> for me is
>     >     >     >>     > typing
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > short code
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> from
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     Google Authenticator
>     > application. Do
>     >     > you use
>     >     >     >>     > something
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > different?
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     czw., 18 lip 2019 o 17:42
> Alex
>     > Harui
>     >     >     >>     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > I don't think git version
>     > matters.
>     >     > Are you
>     >     >     >> using
>     >     >     >>     > your
>     >     >     >>     >     > 2fa
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > token as
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> the
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > password? It should be a
>     > really long
>     >     >     >> sequence of
>     >     >     >>     >     > characters.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Get Outlook for Android<
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=aXoDU8eCG50R2hjNTX5%2FdLIfILY932F86hCQ86aBwWU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     > ________________________________
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > From: Piotr Zarzycki <
>     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Sent: Thursday, July 18,
> 2019
>     >     > 7:43:44 AM
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > To:
> dev@royale.apache.org
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Subject: Re: Discuss of
>     > release steps
>     >     >     >> preparation
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > Maybe Git just should be
>     > updated on
>     >     >     >> Machine ? I
>     >     >     >>     > see
>     >     >     >>     >     > 2.15 and
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > there
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> is 2.22
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > already.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
> 16:35 Piotr
>     >     > Zarzycki <
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > When I do git push -
> I'm
>     > getting
>     >     > separate
>     >     >     >>     > window with
>     >     >     >>     >     > title
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> GitHub Login
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > -
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > where I can enter my
>     >     > login/password. I'm
>     >     >     >> doing
>     >     >     >>     > that
>     >     >     >>     >     > and in
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > the
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> next step
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > it
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > throws me an error in
> the
>     > console
>     >     > - same
>     >     >     >> what I
>     >     >     >>     > have
>     >     >     >>     >     > pasted
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > in
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> previous
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > email.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > I'm typing again login
> and
>     > password
>     >     >     >> cause It's
>     >     >     >>     > asking
>     >     >     >>     >     > me as
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > you
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> can see
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > in
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > the previous email. In
> the
>     > results
>     >     > I get:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > remote: Invalid
> username or
>     >     > password.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > fatal: Authentication
> failed
>     > for '
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-compiler%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=UrZ3i2tKBU53GUOU2sSnFdkibWycS06Gs%2BghnXXm8Qs%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > '
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > Does your steps look
> the
>     > same ?
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > czw., 18 lip 2019 o
> 16:31
>     > Piotr
>     >     > Zarzycki
>     >     >     >> <
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> I did that and I'm
> getting
>     > wrong
>     >     >     >> password or
>     >     >     >>     > user
>     >     >     >>     >     > name, so
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > that
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> must be
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> different case. Let
> me try
>     > now
>     >     > again.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> czw., 18 lip 2019 o
> 16:21
>     > Alex
>     >     > Harui
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > <aha...@adobe.com.invalid>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >> napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> It is asking for your
>     > GitHub
>     >     >     >> username.  Type
>     >     >     >>     > it in
>     >     >     >>     >     > and hit
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> enter, then
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> it will ask for your
>     > GitHub 2FA
>     >     >     >> token.  We
>     >     >     >>     > don't
>     >     >     >>     >     > store our
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> credentials
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > on
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the machine.
>  That's why
>     > the
>     >     >     >> Succeeded email
>     >     >     >>     > says
>     >     >     >>     >     > you
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > will
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> need your
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > GH
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> credentials.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> HTH,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> -Alex
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> On 7/18/19, 7:06 AM,
> "Piotr
>     >     > Zarzycki" <
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> wrote:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     In the first
> step I'm
>     > getting
>     >     >     >> following
>     >     >     >>     > error
>     >     >     >>     >     > during
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > an
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> attempt of
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> login:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     git push
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     fatal:
>     > HttpRequestException
>     >     >     >> encountered.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>        An error
> occurred
>     > while
>     >     > sending
>     >     >     >> the
>     >     >     >>     > request.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Username for '
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=TLwC7zwvkxeJNyfG0Cffr1ma6Z8BaZnAyhHphJcDADI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> ':
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     There is being
>     > suggestion
>     >     > how to
>     >     >     >> resolve
>     >     >     >>     > it
>     >     >     >>     >     > here [1],
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > but
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> I'm not
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> sure
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     whether I can do
> that
>     > on
>     >     > remote PC
>     >     >     >> ?
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     [1]
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >
>     >     >     >>     >
>     >     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcodeshare.co.uk%2Fblog%2Fhow-to-solve-the-github-error-fatal-httprequestexception-encountered%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5df4b604e16410f44a808d7201c803a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013179110173173&amp;sdata=7St0nBmiwOk%2FC11EquDqo8pznnr15MefTZyUJ9iQxBM%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Thanks,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     Piotr
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     czw., 18 lip
> 2019 o
>     > 15:06
>     >     > Piotr
>     >     >     >> Zarzycki <
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Hi Alex,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > I'm getting
> back to
>     > that.
>     >     > Again
>     >     >     >> some
>     >     >     >>     >     > questions:
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > I think you
> will
>     > need to
>     >     > set up
>     >     >     >> your PC
>     >     >     >>     > for
>     >     >     >>     >     > most,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > if not
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> all, of
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> the steps
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> in [1] in
> order to
>     >     >     >> compare/verify the
>     >     >     >>     > output
>     >     >     >>     >     > from
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > [2].
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Above means
> that I
>     > don't
>     >     > need to
>     >     >     >> setup
>     >     >     >>     > my own
>     >     >     >>     >     > PC
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > fully,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> but just
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> to be
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > able to build
>     > project, so
>     >     > could
>     >     >     >> compare
>     >     >     >>     > the
>     >     >     >>     >     > results
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > of
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> build with
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> what
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Jenkins
> produce ?
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > However you are
>     > saying
>     >     > later
>     >     >     >> that you
>     >     >     >>     > didn't
>     >     >     >>     >     > setup
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > step
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> where
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> there is
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > produced
>     > dist/release
>     >     > folder.
>     >     >     >> What I
>     >     >     >>     > got
>     >     >     >>     >     > when I
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > launch
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> each of
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> those
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > step actually
> at the
>     > end ?
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Before you
> answer me
>     > I will
>     >     >     >> study and
>     >     >     >>     > launch
>     >     >     >>     >     > each
>     >     >     >>     >     >     > of step
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> on
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> Jenkins to
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > see what will
> happen.
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Thanks,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > Piotr
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > pon., 8 lip
> 2019 o
>     > 16:59
>     >     > Piotr
>     >     >     >> Zarzycki
>     >     >     >>     > <
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     >
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     > napisał(a):
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> Hi,
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >>
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>     >> I'm occupied
> till
>     > at least
>     >     >     >> Wednesday
>     >     >     >>     > with
>     >     >     >>     >     > important
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >> task, so I
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>> hope to
>     >     >     >>     >     >     >     >>     > >>>

Reply via email to