Can you explain why that would be the right change?  Doesn't make sense to me.

On 8/14/19, 3:36 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <> wrote:

    So far so good. I did tweak the script and was able to upload artifacts. I
    have changed in each script:
    Line from:
    <arg value="-Dwagon.fromDir=${artifactfolder}
    /artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir" />
    <arg value="-Dwagon.fromDir=../../${artifactfolder}
    /artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir" />
    The very last thing was close repository, so I got some errors you can
    check here by logging your Apache handle [1] related to RoyaleUnit [2].
    Missing Signature:
    does not exist for 'royaleunit-ant-tasks-0.9.6.pom'.
    I will try to figure out what has happened, but if someone has any clue to
    that let me know.
    śr., 14 sie 2019 o 10:58 Carlos Rovira <> napisał(a):
    > Hi Alex,
    > El lun., 12 ago. 2019 a las 19:30, Alex Harui (<>)
    > escribió:
    > > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being created
    > > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and ask the RM 
    > > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the develop
    > > branch.
    > AFAIK, we should always commit to dev branch and not to release branch.
    > Releases are cut from develop. Only hot-fixes use to be branches that have
    > commits that fix something important in the release and then use to be
    > merged back to develop and master. Making commits to release branches 
    > bring some confusion and problems.
    > At least from is what I always learnt and used [1]
    > [1];;sdata=wH%2B2sM0uBA8CdSRbaaniZdqaHrRk6hnIwdYZPJHTVLA%3D&amp;reserved=0
    > --
    > Carlos Rovira
    Piotr Zarzycki

Reply via email to