Can you explain why that would be the right change? Doesn't make sense to me.
On 8/14/19, 3:36 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> wrote:
So far so good. I did tweak the script and was able to upload artifacts. I
have changed in each script:
Line from:
<arg value="-Dwagon.fromDir=${artifactfolder}
/artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir" />
To
<arg value="-Dwagon.fromDir=../../${artifactfolder}
/artifacts/archive/target/checkout/release-dir" />
The very last thing was close repository, so I got some errors you can
check here by logging your Apache handle [1] related to RoyaleUnit [2].
Missing Signature:
'/org/apache/royale/compiler/royaleunit-ant-tasks/0.9.6/royaleunit-ant-tasks-0.9.6.pom.asc'
does not exist for 'royaleunit-ant-tasks-0.9.6.pom'.
I will try to figure out what has happened, but if someone has any clue to
that let me know.
[1]
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2F%23stagingRepositories&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc49916dedd948ec37a408d720a330e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013757624763085&sdata=MBN%2FVae7WMZ6YWOD8fQumGivlLwaxfFNwmNE59%2F61Rc%3D&reserved=0
[2]
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpasteboard.co%2FIsDKVTe.png&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc49916dedd948ec37a408d720a330e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013757624763085&sdata=wiTOzckxfuKk9whMWtP1ZbBQ8nPygJb7ORnT0yvLKiM%3D&reserved=0
Thanks,
Piotr
śr., 14 sie 2019 o 10:58 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a):
> Hi Alex,
>
> El lun., 12 ago. 2019 a las 19:30, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > Also, the other committers should be aware that an RC is being created
> > because they see the emails being sent by the CI server and ask the RM
to
> > agree to accept a commit to the release branch instead of the develop
> > branch.
>
>
> AFAIK, we should always commit to dev branch and not to release branch.
> Releases are cut from develop. Only hot-fixes use to be branches that have
> commits that fix something important in the release and then use to be
> merged back to develop and master. Making commits to release branches
could
> bring some confusion and problems.
>
> At least from is what I always learnt and used [1]
>
> [1]
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnvie.com%2Fposts%2Fa-successful-git-branching-model%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc49916dedd948ec37a408d720a330e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013757624763085&sdata=wH%2B2sM0uBA8CdSRbaaniZdqaHrRk6hnIwdYZPJHTVLA%3D&reserved=0
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc49916dedd948ec37a408d720a330e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013757624763085&sdata=ncu5xXT3rnbQG%2BKTZBO6sX61T5gWfOiicgAIXQy8%2F8Y%3D&reserved=0
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon:
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc49916dedd948ec37a408d720a330e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013757624773080&sdata=CY1fo%2FqTgW%2B8Jtx32I7bw%2B0k7ys3iNJ2zxjT3p7P1cU%3D&reserved=0
<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ccc49916dedd948ec37a408d720a330e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637013757624773080&sdata=CY1fo%2FqTgW%2B8Jtx32I7bw%2B0k7ys3iNJ2zxjT3p7P1cU%3D&reserved=0>*
