> On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:45 p.m., Veena Basavaraj wrote:
> > connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/Matcher.java,
> >  line 47
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/29849/diff/1/?file=818951#file818951line47>
> >
> >     Overall I dont understand why even from schema is maintained in the 
> > Matcher since it never even used,
> >     
> >     Another ticket to clean up this. 
> >     
> >     At the end of the day what is important is to schema so we can write 
> > the data adapting to it in one of the many ways we want to do matching.

FROM schema is required by name matching.


- Qian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29849/#review67859
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:14 p.m., Qian Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29849/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 13, 2015, 11:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Bugs: SQOOP-1988
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1988
> 
> 
> Repository: sqoop-sqoop2
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> see jira
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/LocationMatcher.java
>  d92723e 
>   
> connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/Matcher.java
>  36ac5a5 
>   
> connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/NameMatcher.java
>  7cbc39f 
>   
> connector/connector-sdk/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/TestLocationMatcher.java
>  624fa7b 
>   
> connector/connector-sdk/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/TestNameMatcher.java
>  76ff0da 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29849/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Existing tests passed 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Qian Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to