We should ask on OGNL PMC list if we can do that ...
Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/8 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: > OK, I get the point... Frankly, at first glance it looked very familiar.... > > It's not struts' fault, rather OGNL is the responsible of this issue [1]. > This patch [2] solves the problem, but we will face a different > problem: this time we have a patch before, but we have not a place > where we can apply it. > > Lucasz, is there a chance to release the 3.0.2 version of OGNL? > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9?focusedCommentId=13034888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13034888 > [2] > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h > > On 7 June 2011 18:36, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> wrote: >> and the sad thing that is not yet finished :) >> >> On 7 June 2011 18:27, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Maurizio Cucchiara >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:41 >>>> To: Struts Developers List >>>> Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>> >>>> Jason, >>>> we are going to know very soon :) >>> >>> Huston, >>> >>> We have a problem. >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Struts2/312/org.apache.struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>> >>>> >>>> On 7 June 2011 17:37, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>> >> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:35 >>>> >> To: 'Struts Developers List' >>>> >> Subject: RE: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>> >> >>>> >> > -----Original Message----- >>>> >> > From: Lukasz Lenart >>>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:27 >>>> >> > To: Struts Developers List >>>> >> > Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > It should pass base on Java 5. It's strange, Jenkins [1] >>>> >> runs Struts 2 >>>> >> > build on JDK 5 >>>> >> > >>>> >> > [1] https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/ >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/lastBuild/ >>>> >> >>>> >> Module Builds >>>> >> XWork: Core (didn't run) >>>> >> Webapps 2.1 sec >>>> > >>>> > ??? Ignore me, it was listed at the bottom too >>>> > >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/las >>> tBuild/org.apache. >>>> > struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>> > >>>> > But as Maurizio says jenkins is still running on 1.6 >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > Regards >>>> >> > -- >>>> >> > Lukasz >>>> >> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> >> > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > 2011/6/7 Jason Pyeron <[email protected]>: >>>> >> > > Would like some input before filing an issue. >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > 1: Should xwork-core be built with java5 or 6? >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > 2: If java5, does anyone else have a clean build on >>>> >> > revision 1133024? >>>> >> > > >>>> >> <snip/> >>> >>> -- >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> - - >>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - >>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>> - - >>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> > > > > -- > Maurizio Cucchiara > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
