Ok, Ognl 3.0.2 is under way, now is just here [1] [1] https://oss.sonatype.org/
Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ W dniu 21 czerwca 2011 09:39 użytkownik Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> napisał: > Yep, > that patch should be more than sufficient > On 21 June 2011 09:32, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> wrote: >> Maurizio, >> >> I must apply just that [1], yes ? >> >> [1] >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Łukasz >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >> >> >> >> 2011/6/14 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Martin, >>> OGNL has been entered incubation since 2011-04-26 [1]. >>> The source code is in an Apache svn repository (unfortunately we have >>> not been able to import the full history, since it got lost before its >>> time). >>> >>> Now we have two forks: >>> 1. under git-hub >>> 2. under the apache svn repository (incubation). >>> >>> Unfortunately, the latter is not backward-compatible (as Jason said) [2]. >>> OTOH Struts is still using the github version of OGNL. >>> We think we will replace the git-hub version in the next release. >>> >>> >>> >>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ognl.html >>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/bhl23awyvof3z6b2 >>> >>> On 14 June 2011 15:32, Martin Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Lukasz Lenart >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Just point here, we decided that the best option is to make a new Ognl >>>>> release from GitHub source code with Maurizio's patch and number it >>>>> 3.0.2. >>>> >>>> Huh? OGNL is in incubation. The source needs to be in ASF Subversion, >>>> as imported from OpenSymphony subversion with full history and >>>> provenance. I'd be exceedingly surprised if the mentors have signed up >>>> for an ASF incubation release from Github source. Can you point us to >>>> a discussion of where this discussion happened? It seems to me that >>>> this will sink any chances of a successful short term incubation. >>>> That's very bad. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Martin Cooper >>>> >>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> -- >>>>> Łukasz >>>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/6/8 Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>: >>>>>> We should ask on OGNL PMC list if we can do that ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Łukasz >>>>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/6/8 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> OK, I get the point... Frankly, at first glance it looked very >>>>>>> familiar.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's not struts' fault, rather OGNL is the responsible of this issue >>>>>>> [1]. >>>>>>> This patch [2] solves the problem, but we will face a different >>>>>>> problem: this time we have a patch before, but we have not a place >>>>>>> where we can apply it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lucasz, is there a chance to release the 3.0.2 version of OGNL? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1] >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9?focusedCommentId=13034888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13034888 >>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 7 June 2011 18:36, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> and the sad thing that is not yet finished :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7 June 2011 18:27, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> From: Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:41 >>>>>>>>>> To: Struts Developers List >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jason, >>>>>>>>>> we are going to know very soon :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Huston, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a problem. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Struts2/312/org.apache.struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7 June 2011 17:37, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> >> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:35 >>>>>>>>>> >> To: 'Struts Developers List' >>>>>>>>>> >> Subject: RE: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>> >> > From: Lukasz Lenart >>>>>>>>>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:27 >>>>>>>>>> >> > To: Struts Developers List >>>>>>>>>> >> > Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > It should pass base on Java 5. It's strange, Jenkins [1] >>>>>>>>>> >> runs Struts 2 >>>>>>>>>> >> > build on JDK 5 >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > [1] https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/ >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/lastBuild/ >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> Module Builds >>>>>>>>>> >> XWork: Core (didn't run) >>>>>>>>>> >> Webapps 2.1 sec >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > ??? Ignore me, it was listed at the bottom too >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/las >>>>>>>>> tBuild/org.apache. >>>>>>>>>> > struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > But as Maurizio says jenkins is still running on 1.6 >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards >>>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>>>> >> > Lukasz >>>>>>>>>> >> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>>>> >> > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>> >> > 2011/6/7 Jason Pyeron <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>> >> > > Would like some input before filing an issue. >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > 1: Should xwork-core be built with java5 or 6? >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> > > 2: If java5, does anyone else have a clean build on >>>>>>>>>> >> > revision 1133024? >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> <snip/> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>>>>>> - - >>>>>>>>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >>>>>>>>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - >>>>>>>>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>>>>>>>> - - >>>>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>>>>>> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Maurizio Cucchiara > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
