Just point here, we decided that the best option is to make a new Ognl release from GitHub source code with Maurizio's patch and number it 3.0.2.
Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/8 Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>: > We should ask on OGNL PMC list if we can do that ... > > > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > > > 2011/6/8 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: >> OK, I get the point... Frankly, at first glance it looked very familiar.... >> >> It's not struts' fault, rather OGNL is the responsible of this issue [1]. >> This patch [2] solves the problem, but we will face a different >> problem: this time we have a patch before, but we have not a place >> where we can apply it. >> >> Lucasz, is there a chance to release the 3.0.2 version of OGNL? >> >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9?focusedCommentId=13034888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13034888 >> [2] >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h >> >> On 7 June 2011 18:36, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> and the sad thing that is not yet finished :) >>> >>> On 7 June 2011 18:27, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:41 >>>>> To: Struts Developers List >>>>> Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>> >>>>> Jason, >>>>> we are going to know very soon :) >>>> >>>> Huston, >>>> >>>> We have a problem. >>>> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Struts2/312/org.apache.struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7 June 2011 17:37, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>>> >> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:35 >>>>> >> To: 'Struts Developers List' >>>>> >> Subject: RE: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > -----Original Message----- >>>>> >> > From: Lukasz Lenart >>>>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:27 >>>>> >> > To: Struts Developers List >>>>> >> > Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > It should pass base on Java 5. It's strange, Jenkins [1] >>>>> >> runs Struts 2 >>>>> >> > build on JDK 5 >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > [1] https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/lastBuild/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Module Builds >>>>> >> XWork: Core (didn't run) >>>>> >> Webapps 2.1 sec >>>>> > >>>>> > ??? Ignore me, it was listed at the bottom too >>>>> > >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/las >>>> tBuild/org.apache. >>>>> > struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>> > >>>>> > But as Maurizio says jenkins is still running on 1.6 >>>>> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > Regards >>>>> >> > -- >>>>> >> > Lukasz >>>>> >> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>> >> > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > 2011/6/7 Jason Pyeron <[email protected]>: >>>>> >> > > Would like some input before filing an issue. >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > 1: Should xwork-core be built with java5 or 6? >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > 2: If java5, does anyone else have a clean build on >>>>> >> > revision 1133024? >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> <snip/> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>> - - >>>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >>>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - >>>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>>> - - >>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Maurizio Cucchiara >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
