On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]> wrote: > Just point here, we decided that the best option is to make a new Ognl > release from GitHub source code with Maurizio's patch and number it > 3.0.2.
Huh? OGNL is in incubation. The source needs to be in ASF Subversion, as imported from OpenSymphony subversion with full history and provenance. I'd be exceedingly surprised if the mentors have signed up for an ASF incubation release from Github source. Can you point us to a discussion of where this discussion happened? It seems to me that this will sink any chances of a successful short term incubation. That's very bad. -- Martin Cooper > Regards > -- > Łukasz > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ > > > 2011/6/8 Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>: >> We should ask on OGNL PMC list if we can do that ... >> >> >> Regards >> -- >> Łukasz >> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >> >> >> >> 2011/6/8 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: >>> OK, I get the point... Frankly, at first glance it looked very familiar.... >>> >>> It's not struts' fault, rather OGNL is the responsible of this issue [1]. >>> This patch [2] solves the problem, but we will face a different >>> problem: this time we have a patch before, but we have not a place >>> where we can apply it. >>> >>> Lucasz, is there a chance to release the 3.0.2 version of OGNL? >>> >>> [1] >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9?focusedCommentId=13034888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13034888 >>> [2] >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h >>> >>> On 7 June 2011 18:36, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> and the sad thing that is not yet finished :) >>>> >>>> On 7 June 2011 18:27, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:41 >>>>>> To: Struts Developers List >>>>>> Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>> >>>>>> Jason, >>>>>> we are going to know very soon :) >>>>> >>>>> Huston, >>>>> >>>>> We have a problem. >>>>> >>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Struts2/312/org.apache.struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7 June 2011 17:37, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> >> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:35 >>>>>> >> To: 'Struts Developers List' >>>>>> >> Subject: RE: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> >> > From: Lukasz Lenart >>>>>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:27 >>>>>> >> > To: Struts Developers List >>>>>> >> > Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > It should pass base on Java 5. It's strange, Jenkins [1] >>>>>> >> runs Struts 2 >>>>>> >> > build on JDK 5 >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > [1] https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/ >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/lastBuild/ >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Module Builds >>>>>> >> XWork: Core (didn't run) >>>>>> >> Webapps 2.1 sec >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ??? Ignore me, it was listed at the bottom too >>>>>> > >>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/las >>>>> tBuild/org.apache. >>>>>> > struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>>> > >>>>>> > But as Maurizio says jenkins is still running on 1.6 >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > Regards >>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>> >> > Lukasz >>>>>> >> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>> >> > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > 2011/6/7 Jason Pyeron <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >> > > Would like some input before filing an issue. >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > 1: Should xwork-core be built with java5 or 6? >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > 2: If java5, does anyone else have a clean build on >>>>>> >> > revision 1133024? >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> <snip/> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>> - - >>>>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >>>>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - >>>>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>>>> - - >>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
