Maurizio, I must apply just that [1], yes ?
[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ 2011/6/14 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: > Hi Martin, > OGNL has been entered incubation since 2011-04-26 [1]. > The source code is in an Apache svn repository (unfortunately we have > not been able to import the full history, since it got lost before its > time). > > Now we have two forks: > 1. under git-hub > 2. under the apache svn repository (incubation). > > Unfortunately, the latter is not backward-compatible (as Jason said) [2]. > OTOH Struts is still using the github version of OGNL. > We think we will replace the git-hub version in the next release. > > > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ognl.html > [2] http://markmail.org/message/bhl23awyvof3z6b2 > > On 14 June 2011 15:32, Martin Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Lukasz Lenart >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Just point here, we decided that the best option is to make a new Ognl >>> release from GitHub source code with Maurizio's patch and number it >>> 3.0.2. >> >> Huh? OGNL is in incubation. The source needs to be in ASF Subversion, >> as imported from OpenSymphony subversion with full history and >> provenance. I'd be exceedingly surprised if the mentors have signed up >> for an ASF incubation release from Github source. Can you point us to >> a discussion of where this discussion happened? It seems to me that >> this will sink any chances of a successful short term incubation. >> That's very bad. >> >> -- >> Martin Cooper >> >> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Łukasz >>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>> >>> >>> 2011/6/8 Lukasz Lenart <[email protected]>: >>>> We should ask on OGNL PMC list if we can do that ... >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> -- >>>> Łukasz >>>> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/6/8 Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]>: >>>>> OK, I get the point... Frankly, at first glance it looked very >>>>> familiar.... >>>>> >>>>> It's not struts' fault, rather OGNL is the responsible of this issue [1]. >>>>> This patch [2] solves the problem, but we will face a different >>>>> problem: this time we have a patch before, but we have not a place >>>>> where we can apply it. >>>>> >>>>> Lucasz, is there a chance to release the 3.0.2 version of OGNL? >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9?focusedCommentId=13034888&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13034888 >>>>> [2] >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/OgnlRuntime.java?r1=1103138&r2=1104581&diff_format=h >>>>> >>>>> On 7 June 2011 18:36, Maurizio Cucchiara <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> and the sad thing that is not yet finished :) >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7 June 2011 18:27, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:41 >>>>>>>> To: Struts Developers List >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jason, >>>>>>>> we are going to know very soon :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Huston, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Struts2/312/org.apache.struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7 June 2011 17:37, Jason Pyeron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> >> From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>>> >> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:35 >>>>>>>> >> To: 'Struts Developers List' >>>>>>>> >> Subject: RE: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> >> > From: Lukasz Lenart >>>>>>>> >> > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:27 >>>>>>>> >> > To: Struts Developers List >>>>>>>> >> > Subject: Re: Java5 test issues on xwork-core, it passes in Java6 >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > It should pass base on Java 5. It's strange, Jenkins [1] >>>>>>>> >> runs Struts 2 >>>>>>>> >> > build on JDK 5 >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > [1] https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/ >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/lastBuild/ >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Module Builds >>>>>>>> >> XWork: Core (didn't run) >>>>>>>> >> Webapps 2.1 sec >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > ??? Ignore me, it was listed at the bottom too >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Struts/job/Struts2/las >>>>>>> tBuild/org.apache. >>>>>>>> > struts.xwork$xwork-core/ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > But as Maurizio says jenkins is still running on 1.6 >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > Regards >>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>> >> > Lukasz >>>>>>>> >> > + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ >>>>>>>> >> > Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/ >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >> > 2011/6/7 Jason Pyeron <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >> > > Would like some input before filing an issue. >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > 1: Should xwork-core be built with java5 or 6? >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >> > > 2: If java5, does anyone else have a clean build on >>>>>>>> >> > revision 1133024? >>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >> <snip/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>>>> - - >>>>>>> - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - >>>>>>> - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - >>>>>>> - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - >>>>>>> - - >>>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >>>>>>> This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > > -- > Maurizio Cucchiara > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
