+1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided super fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :( Thanks Alex On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>wrote: > Need to check whereas the option A is possible. > > I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release maintenance > as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new > features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates. > > Latest option is not acceptable for me > > To summarize: > A = 0 > B = +1 > C = -1 > > > JLouis > > > 2013/11/7 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > > So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or they > > won't be able to move forward with TomEE. > > > > We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options: > > > > A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2 > > B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've done > > this with other things before on rare occasion > > > > Of course there is a 3rd option: > > > > C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time > > that they'll need a release. > > > > I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys out > > to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that > > frequent release thing down. > > > > So which option would have your vote? > > > > > > -David > > > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > > > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much > > sucks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org > > >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25 > > >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 > > >> > > >> > > >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we > > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something > > people can beat on. > > >> > > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using > > 2.2.2? > > >> > > >> > > >> -David > > >> > > >> > > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark > > had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need. > > Mark, that still something you're up for doing? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -David > > >>> > > >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Cool, thanks! > > >>>> > > >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans. > > >>>> > > >>>> JLouis > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >>>> > > >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now > > (thanks > > >>>>> David for TCK report) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production > with > > >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB). > > >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real > releases. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated > regarding > > the > > >>>>>> community. > > >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we > > are > > >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> JLouis > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hehe, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to > > be > > >>>>>>> realistic. > > >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com > > > > a > > >>>>>> écrit > > >>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do > better > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>>> more > > >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't > > move > > >>>>>> but > > >>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we > > just > > >>>>>>> need > > >>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>> ask). > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) > > so > > >>>>> we > > >>>>>>>> need > > >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able > > to > > >>>>> do > > >>>>>>> so. > > >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just > > >>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>> IMO. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement > Java > > >>>>> EE > > >>>>>> 7. > > >>>>>>>> The > > >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean > validation. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by > the > > >>>>>> end > > >>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>> September. > > >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA? > > >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release > > >>>>> another > > >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> any comment? > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <tiklugang...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>>>>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack > > >>>>> we > > >>>>>>>> have > > >>>>>>>>>> ATM, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :( > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" < > > >>>>>>>> jeano...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's > > >>>>>>>> necessary > > >>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>> my > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Jean-Louis > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Louis >
