He has mail, no time to work but enough to say us. At least youd need to rever openjpa 2335 and check openjpa and tck are still passing Le 8 nov. 2013 07:43, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Note, wait-and-talk-to-mark is essentially option C as Mark isn't back > from JAX till next week. > > So far option B seems the dominant choice. I'll get started with that and > try and get some binaries up for tire-kicking then go to bed. > > > -David > > On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait > openjpa > > (or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)... > > > > I just dont want a blind release > > Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <alex.m3...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > >> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with > >> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided > super > >> fast (this week at least as a release candidate) > >> > >> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :( > >> > >> Thanks > >> Alex > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > jeano...@gmail.com > >>> wrote: > >> > >>> Need to check whereas the option A is possible. > >>> > >>> I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release > >> maintenance > >>> as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new > >>> features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates. > >>> > >>> Latest option is not acceptable for me > >>> > >>> To summarize: > >>> A = 0 > >>> B = +1 > >>> C = -1 > >>> > >>> > >>> JLouis > >>> > >>> > >>> 2013/11/7 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or > >> they > >>>> won't be able to move forward with TomEE. > >>>> > >>>> We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options: > >>>> > >>>> A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2 > >>>> B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've > >> done > >>>> this with other things before on rare occasion > >>>> > >>>> Of course there is a 3rd option: > >>>> > >>>> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time > >>>> that they'll need a release. > >>>> > >>>> I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys > >> out > >>>> to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get > that > >>>> frequent release thing down. > >>>> > >>>> So which option would have your vote? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >>>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much > >>>> sucks. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> ________________________________ > >>>>>> From: David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> To: dev@tomee.apache.org > >>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25 > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies > >> we > >>>> have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something > >>>> people can beat on. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using > >>>> 2.2.2? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -David > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. > >> Mark > >>>> had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we > >> need. > >>>> Mark, that still something you're up for doing? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -David > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO < > >> jeano...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cool, thanks! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> JLouis > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now > >>>> (thanks > >>>>>>>>> David for TCK report) > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production > >>> with > >>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB). > >>>>>>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real > >>> releases. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated > >>> regarding > >>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> community. > >>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause > >> we > >>>> are > >>>>>>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hehe, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer > >> to > >>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>> realistic. > >>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" < > >> jeano...@gmail.com > >>>> > >>>> a > >>>>>>>>>> écrit > >>>>>>>>>>> : > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do > >>> better > >>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> more > >>>>>>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't > >>>> move > >>>>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO > >> (we > >>>> just > >>>>>>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ask). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself > >> ;) > >>>> so > >>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>>> need > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not > >> able > >>>> to > >>>>>>>>> do > >>>>>>>>>>> so. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's > >> just > >>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement > >>> Java > >>>>>>>>> EE > >>>>>>>>>> 7. > >>>>>>>>>>>> The > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean > >>> validation. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by > >>> the > >>>>>>>>>> end > >>>>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> September. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release > >>>>>>>>> another > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any comment? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <tiklugang...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly > >> hack > >>>>>>>>> we > >>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATM, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*< > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :( > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" < > >>>>>>>>>>>> jeano...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's > >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jean-Louis > >>> > >> > >
