Can we/should we include the travel sample that is used for Tuscany In
Action book with this release?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:

> The 1.x trunk build on Hudson is about sorted out now so how about
> starting on the release - unless anyones any big work items they still
> want to get done I'd like to take the release branch early next week
> so we can slowly start getting it ready to release.
>
>  ...ant
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ant elder <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM
> Subject: Re: next 1.x release
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> We should be able to get a 1.x release out by Feburary, might be a bit
> slow getting it started right now as people will be off over the end
> of year break but it should January should be time to get it done.
>
>   ...ant
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Phillips, Chad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > As far as a timeframe, we'd like to see a final release on or before
> 01-FEB-2010 if possible.  Is that doable or is that too soon?
> >
> > The only other thing that I'd want to see looked into before a 1.6
> release would be [1] which has to w/ the policy framework not working
> correctly.  The policy framework is going to be a pretty critical selling
> point of using Tuscany in my project and the current workaround for
> disabling a policy (step 3 in the issue description) is not really a long
> term solution.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3356
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 01:53
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: next 1.x release
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Chad
> >>
> >> I was thinking the same. I suggest we start looking at an RC0 and see
> >> what's changes are in there and what needs to be done to get a release
> >> out. We can the move through the process of creating the release
> >> itself.
> >>
> >> Are there any things people want to get into 1.x before a 1.6 release?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Simon
> >>
> >
> > +1 on a release, i've not got particular items to get in but happy to
> > help get it done if people need one.
> >
> > Chad, can you give us an idea of what sort of timeframe would be good
> > for you to get it done by?
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
>



-- 
http://www.linkedin.com/in/halehmahbod
co-author of Tuscany SCA book, www.TuscanyinAction.com

Reply via email to