Actually now as i look at whats changed in the 1.x trunk i notice we never asked if we want a 1.6 or 1.5.2 release. We already have a 1.5.2 branch and it would be a lot less work to do a 1.5.2 release than a new release from 1.x trunk as there are a lot less changes. Anyone have any preferences?
...ant On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:02 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, I've added a Hudson build for the 1.6 branch to make it easier > to see its building ok without having to run the long build yourself - > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/All/job/Tuscany-1.6-brn/ > > ...ant > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> FYI I've created the release branch for 1.6 and updated the 1.x trunk >> version to 1.7-SNAPSHOT. Have some builds running but I expect there's >> some version updates I've missed, if you notice any problems let me >> know or just go ahead and fix them. It'll be a while till the 1.6 >> branch is cleaned up ready to release so feel free to help or make any >> changes to the branch for now. >> >> ...ant >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:43 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> If its ready to go then sure. Its still not been moved from the >>> sandbox to trunk has it? If that can happen before the release gets >>> done than i don't see why it couldn't be included in the release. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, haleh mahbod <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Can we/should we include the travel sample that is used for Tuscany In >>>> Action book with this release? >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The 1.x trunk build on Hudson is about sorted out now so how about >>>>> starting on the release - unless anyones any big work items they still >>>>> want to get done I'd like to take the release branch early next week >>>>> so we can slowly start getting it ready to release. >>>>> >>>>> ...ant >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: ant elder <[email protected]> >>>>> Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: next 1.x release >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We should be able to get a 1.x release out by Feburary, might be a bit >>>>> slow getting it started right now as people will be off over the end >>>>> of year break but it should January should be time to get it done. >>>>> >>>>> ...ant >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Phillips, Chad <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > As far as a timeframe, we'd like to see a final release on or before >>>>> > 01-FEB-2010 if possible. Is that doable or is that too soon? >>>>> > >>>>> > The only other thing that I'd want to see looked into before a 1.6 >>>>> > release would be [1] which has to w/ the policy framework not working >>>>> > correctly. The policy framework is going to be a pretty critical >>>>> > selling >>>>> > point of using Tuscany in my project and the current workaround for >>>>> > disabling a policy (step 3 in the issue description) is not really a >>>>> > long >>>>> > term solution. >>>>> > >>>>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3356 >>>>> > >>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>> > From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 01:53 >>>>> > To: [email protected] >>>>> > Subject: Re: next 1.x release >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >> Hi Chad >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I was thinking the same. I suggest we start looking at an RC0 and see >>>>> >> what's changes are in there and what needs to be done to get a release >>>>> >> out. We can the move through the process of creating the release >>>>> >> itself. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Are there any things people want to get into 1.x before a 1.6 release? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Regards >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Simon >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > +1 on a release, i've not got particular items to get in but happy to >>>>> > help get it done if people need one. >>>>> > >>>>> > Chad, can you give us an idea of what sort of timeframe would be good >>>>> > for you to get it done by? >>>>> > >>>>> > ...ant >>>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/halehmahbod >>>> co-author of Tuscany SCA book, www.TuscanyinAction.com >>>> >>> >> >
