ant elder wrote:
Actually now as i look at whats changed in the 1.x trunk i notice we
never asked if we want a 1.6 or 1.5.2 release. We already have a 1.5.2
branch and it would be a lot less work to do a 1.5.2 release than a
new release from 1.x trunk as there are a lot less changes. Anyone
have any preferences?
...ant
Would the release be providing any new functionality, or just bug fixes?
If it's just bug fixes, I have no preference. If it's new functionality,
my preference would be for 1.6.
Simon
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:02 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
Also, I've added a Hudson build for the 1.6 branch to make it easier
to see its building ok without having to run the long build yourself -
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/All/job/Tuscany-1.6-brn/
...ant
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
FYI I've created the release branch for 1.6 and updated the 1.x trunk
version to 1.7-SNAPSHOT. Have some builds running but I expect there's
some version updates I've missed, if you notice any problems let me
know or just go ahead and fix them. It'll be a while till the 1.6
branch is cleaned up ready to release so feel free to help or make any
changes to the branch for now.
...ant
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:43 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
If its ready to go then sure. Its still not been moved from the
sandbox to trunk has it? If that can happen before the release gets
done than i don't see why it couldn't be included in the release.
...ant
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, haleh mahbod <[email protected]> wrote:
Can we/should we include the travel sample that is used for Tuscany In
Action book with this release?
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
The 1.x trunk build on Hudson is about sorted out now so how about
starting on the release - unless anyones any big work items they still
want to get done I'd like to take the release branch early next week
so we can slowly start getting it ready to release.
...ant
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ant elder <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: next 1.x release
To: [email protected]
We should be able to get a 1.x release out by Feburary, might be a bit
slow getting it started right now as people will be off over the end
of year break but it should January should be time to get it done.
...ant
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Phillips, Chad <[email protected]>
wrote:
As far as a timeframe, we'd like to see a final release on or before
01-FEB-2010 if possible. Is that doable or is that too soon?
The only other thing that I'd want to see looked into before a 1.6
release would be [1] which has to w/ the policy framework not working
correctly. The policy framework is going to be a pretty critical selling
point of using Tuscany in my project and the current workaround for
disabling a policy (step 3 in the issue description) is not really a long
term solution.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3356
-----Original Message-----
From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 01:53
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: next 1.x release
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Chad
I was thinking the same. I suggest we start looking at an RC0 and see
what's changes are in there and what needs to be done to get a release
out. We can the move through the process of creating the release
itself.
Are there any things people want to get into 1.x before a 1.6 release?
Regards
Simon
+1 on a release, i've not got particular items to get in but happy to
help get it done if people need one.
Chad, can you give us an idea of what sort of timeframe would be good
for you to get it done by?
...ant
--
http://www.linkedin.com/in/halehmahbod
co-author of Tuscany SCA book, www.TuscanyinAction.com
