Also, I've added a Hudson build for the 1.6 branch to make it easier to see its building ok without having to run the long build yourself - http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/All/job/Tuscany-1.6-brn/
...ant On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:38 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI I've created the release branch for 1.6 and updated the 1.x trunk > version to 1.7-SNAPSHOT. Have some builds running but I expect there's > some version updates I've missed, if you notice any problems let me > know or just go ahead and fix them. It'll be a while till the 1.6 > branch is cleaned up ready to release so feel free to help or make any > changes to the branch for now. > > ...ant > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:43 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> If its ready to go then sure. Its still not been moved from the >> sandbox to trunk has it? If that can happen before the release gets >> done than i don't see why it couldn't be included in the release. >> >> ...ant >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, haleh mahbod <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Can we/should we include the travel sample that is used for Tuscany In >>> Action book with this release? >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The 1.x trunk build on Hudson is about sorted out now so how about >>>> starting on the release - unless anyones any big work items they still >>>> want to get done I'd like to take the release branch early next week >>>> so we can slowly start getting it ready to release. >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: ant elder <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM >>>> Subject: Re: next 1.x release >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> We should be able to get a 1.x release out by Feburary, might be a bit >>>> slow getting it started right now as people will be off over the end >>>> of year break but it should January should be time to get it done. >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Phillips, Chad <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > As far as a timeframe, we'd like to see a final release on or before >>>> > 01-FEB-2010 if possible. Is that doable or is that too soon? >>>> > >>>> > The only other thing that I'd want to see looked into before a 1.6 >>>> > release would be [1] which has to w/ the policy framework not working >>>> > correctly. The policy framework is going to be a pretty critical selling >>>> > point of using Tuscany in my project and the current workaround for >>>> > disabling a policy (step 3 in the issue description) is not really a long >>>> > term solution. >>>> > >>>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3356 >>>> > >>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>> > From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 01:53 >>>> > To: [email protected] >>>> > Subject: Re: next 1.x release >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> Hi Chad >>>> >> >>>> >> I was thinking the same. I suggest we start looking at an RC0 and see >>>> >> what's changes are in there and what needs to be done to get a release >>>> >> out. We can the move through the process of creating the release >>>> >> itself. >>>> >> >>>> >> Are there any things people want to get into 1.x before a 1.6 release? >>>> >> >>>> >> Regards >>>> >> >>>> >> Simon >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > +1 on a release, i've not got particular items to get in but happy to >>>> > help get it done if people need one. >>>> > >>>> > Chad, can you give us an idea of what sort of timeframe would be good >>>> > for you to get it done by? >>>> > >>>> > ...ant >>>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/halehmahbod >>> co-author of Tuscany SCA book, www.TuscanyinAction.com >>> >> >
