If its ready to go then sure. Its still not been moved from the sandbox to trunk has it? If that can happen before the release gets done than i don't see why it couldn't be included in the release.
...ant On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, haleh mahbod <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we/should we include the travel sample that is used for Tuscany In > Action book with this release? > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The 1.x trunk build on Hudson is about sorted out now so how about >> starting on the release - unless anyones any big work items they still >> want to get done I'd like to take the release branch early next week >> so we can slowly start getting it ready to release. >> >> ...ant >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: ant elder <[email protected]> >> Date: Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM >> Subject: Re: next 1.x release >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> We should be able to get a 1.x release out by Feburary, might be a bit >> slow getting it started right now as people will be off over the end >> of year break but it should January should be time to get it done. >> >> ...ant >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Phillips, Chad <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > As far as a timeframe, we'd like to see a final release on or before >> > 01-FEB-2010 if possible. Is that doable or is that too soon? >> > >> > The only other thing that I'd want to see looked into before a 1.6 >> > release would be [1] which has to w/ the policy framework not working >> > correctly. The policy framework is going to be a pretty critical selling >> > point of using Tuscany in my project and the current workaround for >> > disabling a policy (step 3 in the issue description) is not really a long >> > term solution. >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3356 >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: ant elder [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 01:53 >> > To: [email protected] >> > Subject: Re: next 1.x release >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Chad >> >> >> >> I was thinking the same. I suggest we start looking at an RC0 and see >> >> what's changes are in there and what needs to be done to get a release >> >> out. We can the move through the process of creating the release >> >> itself. >> >> >> >> Are there any things people want to get into 1.x before a 1.6 release? >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> Simon >> >> >> > >> > +1 on a release, i've not got particular items to get in but happy to >> > help get it done if people need one. >> > >> > Chad, can you give us an idea of what sort of timeframe would be good >> > for you to get it done by? >> > >> > ...ant >> > > > > > -- > http://www.linkedin.com/in/halehmahbod > co-author of Tuscany SCA book, www.TuscanyinAction.com >
