Hi *, On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:51:15PM -0800, Kay Schenk wrote: > :murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Updated my proposal: > >http://www.murb.nl/extern/openoffice.org/websiteproposal/2.1/ > > Maarten...good changes...some questions/comments > > * why did you put the top part in a frame? Frames are frowned on from an > "accessibility" standpoint and I'm not sure why you found this necessary.
Frames are a no-go. And even when not technically using frames (but <div>s) I don't like scrollbars inside the page. Please revert. > <--snipped--> > >* Pages that don't function need redesign; the homepage should not > >'solve' problems of other pages hosted at openoffice.org (no workarounds!) > > I don't think anyone assumes that! Daniel sees this differently. > Pros thing about this page... > * simple, really NO clutter > * friendly, not overwhelming. New users would certainly like it I would > think. > > Cons > * a radical departure from what we have now...maybe too radical I don't know > * how easily can other pages be merged into this framework? > Not a quick answer without trail and error <sigh>: It is no problem merging this to the framework. See http://hu.openoffice.org -> It hides the framework using CSS The same could be done for the frontpage. This hiding could be done by the global stylesheet. The replacement can be inserted using the "servlets" (PreServlet.vm). No real technical restrictions. The only question is: will the projects be happy with it (but this should not hinder us from redisigning) ciao Christian -- NP: Linkin Park - Numb --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
