Hi *, On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:46:50PM -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > > >Cons > >* a radical departure from what we have now...maybe too radical I don't > know > >* how easily can other pages be merged into this framework? > > My guess: not easily. Nor would that be desirable for most projects, > many of which use the left navbar very actively.
Na, disagree. Many have their additions/replacement in the navbar, many others have an additional navbar that is used. But: there is no technical hinderness. You can create a navbar by default and hide it using CSS and use your own. > Bu then, that would > follow the pattern of Moz, too, which has a left navbar for its > developer pages. > > <http://www.mozilla.org/developer/> > > In short, any change like the one proposed by Maarten would obtain only > for the homepage--and arguably download & support pages--pages catering > to non-developers. No. I don't think so. There is no reason why projects should not use a navbar, by why should it be enforced? Using css you could create a "sticky" navbar (does not scroll with the page) or whatever you want. I still vote for getting rid of the automatically generated navbar. ciao Christian -- NP: Monster Magnet - Black Mastermind --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
