hi >> And I will also ask if the /nonav/ option can be staticized. > >No- you got me wrong. I wanted to know whether statication is necessary >for nonav links at all. > ah.
>From my knowledge, you need to staticize pages to avoid them being >processed by the java-programs that put together the webpages. That is what I understand too. > >Put together = read file, add header, footer, navbar > >Insetad of putting the pages together, an already assembled page is >delivered to the user. Right.. > >Since no such elements (header, footer, navbar) is added when using >navbar links, I think that the page is delivered verbatim, without >being processed. Thanks for the clarification. I'll ask then to see if staticization is at all needed then. > >As you once said that images are checked by the VM as well, it could >reduce the load by referencing the images or other files with >nonav-links. Yes. But all key images I put in look/.../images/, which are not apparently called in the same manner and do not need staticization, if placed there. > >ciao >Christian best Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
