Hi Louis, *, On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 03:15:57PM -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:13:44PM -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > >> [snip] > >Why don't you listen to what I write :-( > > the same could be said from my end :-) Ok. Sorry.
> >http://de.openoffice.org/index.html is staticized and uses the same > method > >(CSS) to hide the (in this case right) navbar (toggle the alternative > >stylesheet on using View|Styles -> no navbar. > > > >In your logic any site that uses CSS would not be staticizable. > > I am being conservative. I am also open, as is evident, to proposals, > and I generally like yours. I defer to your more more sophisticated > knowledge, of course, and so my point is merely that of wanting to be > sure it works and that any such solution is maintainable. Clearly understandable. > Obviously we need a staging server. > > And I will also ask if the /nonav/ option can be staticized. No- you got me wrong. I wanted to know whether statication is necessary for nonav links at all. >From my knowledge, you need to staticize pages to avoid them being processed by the java-programs that put together the webpages. Put together = read file, add header, footer, navbar Insetad of putting the pages together, an already assembled page is delivered to the user. Since no such elements (header, footer, navbar) is added when using navbar links, I think that the page is delivered verbatim, without being processed. As you once said that images are checked by the VM as well, it could reduce the load by referencing the images or other files with nonav-links. ciao Christian -- NP: Kid Rock - Roving Gangster (Rollin') --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
