Hi Louis, On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 02:13:44PM -0800, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > [snip] > > > > ><sigh>: It is no problem merging this to the framework. See > >http://hu.openoffice.org -> It hides the framework using CSS > >The same could be done for the frontpage. > > The HU project is not really to be thought of as an example until we can > confirm the page can be staticized.
Why don't you listen to what I write :-( http://de.openoffice.org/index.html is staticized and uses the same method (CSS) to hide the (in this case right) navbar (toggle the alternative stylesheet on using View|Styles -> no navbar. In your logic any site that uses CSS would not be staticizable. > >This hiding could be done by the global stylesheet. The replacement can > >be inserted using the "servlets" (PreServlet.vm). > > > >No real technical restrictions. The only question is: will the projects > >be happy with it (but this should not hinder us from redisigning) > > Indeed: and I think that many projects would not want that. I see the > homepage as having one design, with perhaps also some others catering to > users sharing it. For developer projects, I see the left navbar as > really important, and those projects indeed use it. But they don't use it verbatim, but they add their own Items to it. This is the same as not creating one by default but having the projects create their own. http://api.openoffice.org/ -> own additions http://dba.openoffice.org/ -> own additions ... *All* native-lang project: own additional navbar or diabled/replaced original navbar I'm sure many of those having the unmodified navbar don't really care about having the navbar or not. It is just there. ciao Christian -- NP: Slipknot - Me Inside --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
