Hi Matthew, et al.,


>Hi Daniel, Maarten, Kay, Louis, and everyone else.
>
>It is coming to the point where a decision needs to be made between the 
>web site proposals. We specified Jan 28 (UTC?) as the deadline for the
>proposals, seeing as it is Jan 27 here, that gives me (not sure about
>the others) one more day.

:-)

>
>Current viable proposals:
>---------------------------------------------
>1) Matthew OOoWeb2 
>   URL =
http://website.openoffice.org/nonav/tryouts/Matthew/OOoWeb2/index.htm
>2) Maarten Murb 2.1
>   URL = http://www.murb.nl/extern/openoffice.org/websiteproposal/2.1/
>3) Matthew OOoWeb2.1
>   URL =
http://website.openoffice.org/nonav/tryouts/Matthew/OOoWeb2.1/index.htm
>---------------------------------------------
>
>At this fairly early stage in deployment, I believe that we must judge
>these pages on the following criteria, in this order: - Usability -
>Effectiveness (from our perspective) of the layout - And the Visual
>Style.

Agreed.


>
>Any proposal could have changes applied to it, so I think it is
>important to choose the web site this is *most* flexible, and the
>*best* one (rather than the perfect one, which we have already
>discussed).

Agreed.

>
>My proposals are not entirely finished, and neither are Maarten's.
>However, the time draws near that the decision must be made. Keep in
>mind that no decision is final, and the website that is replaced now,
>can be easily changed later.
>
>Also, the proposals only cover the first page, other pages' styles are
>yet to be made in both cases (although I have played around with a few
>of the other pages myself).

Yes... again, I've requested a staging server and just sent off a
nagging query.  I'm anticipating we can use it for global CSS changes.
Though we can change incrementally on a production site, none of us
really wants to.  Changing the CSS on the homepage incrementally is
probably a lot safer....

>
>I am not exactly certain how the choice is going to take place,
>perhaps Louis has some ideas? Perhaps a simple vote in the mailing
>list is all that we need, perhaps not, I will leave that up to the
>authorities (Kay and Louis).

:-)  

Kay and I will go over that but whatever method chosen will be fair. 

>
>I, personally, am willing to help with any pages that need to redone
>(such as support, download, etc), regardless of the proposal chosen,
>and will almost always be available to help.

Thanks!!
>
>Well done to everyone who has helped with the creation of these great
>proposals, and submitted constructive suggestions. I look forward to
>seeing how it will go.

>
>If anyone has any ideas that need to be incorporated in my proposals,
>please let me know ;).

:-) 
>
>Kind Regards,

Thanks Matthew,
Louis


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to