On Wednesday 26 January 2005 6:50, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote: > Hi Kay, > > >> Kay and I will go over that but whatever method chosen will be > >> fair. > > > >Louis--I guess I was thinking we would submit the lot (the 3 of them) > >to Project Leads for consideration and go from there. We would of > >course tell them in the Announcement that these are not to be viewed > >as totally complete projects at this point, but basically, which one > >should be persued. Yes? > > yes. > > How about this process: > > After 28 January (soonest after) we send the proposals and a summary > of our critiques to the Project Leads. > > They "go from there" and discuss content and other things. No > substantively new proposals are allowed, only modifications on those > present by 28 January. Discussions should probably be on a list set > aside for this purpose to which all have access. (I can just cut and > paste subscribers to PLs to the new list.) > > The PLs then vote 14-15 February on the public list--public voting.
I understand that you don't want to rush into changes; but, another 2 weeks of angst seems cruel and unusual punishment. How about reducing it to 1 week. It has already been discussed ad nauseum. And call for a vote on 7-8 February at the latest. > Meanwhile, we should have a staging server during this process so we > can test out the ideas. All of the pages have some merit. My tendency is for the one that appeals most to me: http://website.openoffice.org/nonav/tryouts/Matthew/OOoWeb2/index.htm Probably has nothing to do with all the fine points of interface design but one hopes that, intuitively, good design will be the most appealing, if good design is a valid concept as has been argued. regards, Richard. > As to why this process: Kay and I agree that the HP is the portal and > gateway to OOo and thus needs to include the input of the Project. > > Best > Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
