Hi Kay, >> Kay and I will go over that but whatever method chosen will be fair. > >Louis--I guess I was thinking we would submit the lot (the 3 of them) >to Project Leads for consideration and go from there. We would of >course tell them in the Announcement that these are not to be viewed >as totally complete projects at this point, but basically, which one >should be persued. Yes?
yes. How about this process: After 28 January (soonest after) we send the proposals and a summary of our critiques to the Project Leads. They "go from there" and discuss content and other things. No substantively new proposals are allowed, only modifications on those present by 28 January. Discussions should probably be on a list set aside for this purpose to which all have access. (I can just cut and paste subscribers to PLs to the new list.) The PLs then vote 14-15 February on the public list--public voting. Meanwhile, we should have a staging server during this process so we can test out the ideas. As to why this process: Kay and I agree that the HP is the portal and gateway to OOo and thus needs to include the input of the Project. Best Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
