Thanks for CCing me (maintainer of protobuf here), I am particularly not happy that some module (which is not even called protobuf, but some random Java #$%! with ripped out python support overrides my builds).
I have put a proposal into a FESCo ticket. On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Today I've attempted to run "dnf upgrade". > > It has the following in it: > > Upgrading: > protobuf x86_64 3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38e updates-modular > > Enabling module streams: > ant > eclipse > maven > > > I don't consider this behavior adequate for a released Fedora version. > > As a maintainer of dependent packages (Cura stack) I have tested and built it > against the nonmodular protobuf. What just happened here and how do I track > it down? > > dnf doesn't even tell me what module is this in. I suppose eclipse. > > However, protobuf was not mentioned in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2285 > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC: mhroncok > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
