On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:51 AM Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for CCing me (maintainer of protobuf here), I am particularly
> not happy that some module (which is not even called protobuf, but
> some random Java #$%! with ripped out python support overrides my
> builds).
>
> I have put a proposal into a FESCo ticket.
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:44 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Today I've attempted to run "dnf upgrade".
> >
> > It has the following in it:
> >
> > Upgrading:
> > protobuf  x86_64  3.6.1-6.module_f31+6793+1c93c38e  updates-modular
> >
> > Enabling module streams:
> >   ant
> >   eclipse
> >   maven
> >
> >
> > I don't consider this behavior adequate for a released Fedora version.
> >
> > As a maintainer of dependent packages (Cura stack) I have tested and built 
> > it
> > against the nonmodular protobuf. What just happened here and how do I track 
> > it down?
> >
> > dnf doesn't even tell me what module is this in. I suppose eclipse.
> >
> > However, protobuf was not mentioned in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2285
> >


For the record, I've just pushed a temporary removal of the eclipse
default stream, so the next compose will not have it. For those of you
who are affected, your best bet would be to use `yum history rollback`
and wait to update again until tomorrow.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to