On Thursday, April 2, 2020 4:56:33 PM PDT Adam Williamson wrote: > Correction here: the decision process *was* actually initiated quite > publicly. It was announced in January, in a thread titled "Git Forge > Requirements: Please see the Community Blog", which (as you'd guess) > linked to a Community Blog post announcing that a decision was to be > made under the Open Decision Framework: > > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/
Ok, I stand corrected then. :) > thus far, I'd say that was an example of good process, on the face of > it. Yes, on the face, and with good intentions nonetheless. :) > It can be argued that things went wrong later. I agree 100% with that. Either way, Jeremy should not have been made to feel the way he is feeling, and I would guess that applies to many people in this thread. My point still stands that there was a failure at the leadership level. Erich
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
