On 11. 05. 20 19:36, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One strong argument for the proposed change is that, currently, an
abstention or recusal (TIL that's the proper term) is essentially
equivalent to a negative vote. (As long as we require +5 to pass,
any vote apart from +1 has the same effect.)
In a hypothetical case where three or four FESCo members were involved
in a change and decided to recuse themselves, a proposal gets a very
high bar of 5/6 or 5/7 votes. If one or two voting members are absent,
the change may not even pass even if*all* non-abstaining members are
in favour.
If that is the only problem we are trying to solve here, I think we might very
well create a concept of formal recusal and only lower the bar on such occasion.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
