On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 10:19:02PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Bug or feature, it seems to be intentional as per the discussion in
> the texlive change.

It took me a while to find any discussion of this, but I guess you
mean this link?

https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f44-change-proposal-texlive2025-self-contained/165120/23

Not much discussion seems to have happened before the change.  Some
happened afterwards (about how it broke stuff).  Also, it happened on
an opaque website that I don't visit regularly, because that site
still cannot send useful emails.

I'm not necessarily objecting to this change, but it would have been
nice if the packages that it broke could have been updated by a proven
packager.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to