> Is it? http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ is quoted in every single > release notice. Because I did not know it contained anything that should > not be known about.
Just because someone can theoretically navigate to the URL doesn't mean anything. > That would be far too late. They would sue us for damages. Whether they > won or not, it'd be an almighty mess. Firstly, this is nonsense, there is no way that Sun would go to such lengths over a minor (and debatable) license infringement. Secondly, even if this were not the case, Sun is the least of our legal worries. > Yes indeed. The common sense view is that we are distributing the Sun > JRE without license. At least within the community of people who read > the mailing lists, which is pretty huge if you count the possible > readers from the archives. Sorry, I didn't notice that you had conducted a comprehensive survey - how many of the respondants were lawyers? > > I have no problem getting responses from Sun when I need to - perhaps > > you aren't asking politely? > > Perhaps I don't ask politely because their code and the fact that it > hasn't been fixed in over a year and now they are rushing ahead with > AIO, functional programming and other such bullshit when nobody in their > right mind would write a server app using java.nio demonstrates that > they are total fuckwits? I guess that answers my question. Ian. -- Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
