On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 07:35:03AM -0500, Steven Hazel wrote: > > Great idea, although I think we should take advantage of the fact > > that we're now reserving // to indicate metadata processing in a URI > > and try to avoid making up meta keytypes. So instead the date-based > > URI should look like a normal KSK or SSK followed by // and > > something that signifies date-based URI rewriting. > That sounds great, but I can't think of a way to do it without getting > in the way of the whole docname thing. If someone can think of a > decent way to do that, I agree that we should go with it.
DocNames is flexable. There are many things which could be argued should be in this and we don't want a new type (MSK, DBR) for every one. Should should recognise that in the future we will have more. So why don't we generalise it? Setting DocName is only 1 thing that metadata can do. Keep everything before // *as it is*. So for each metadata command you can specify some options. By default I think we need to act like it's a docname in order for the browsing trick to work. But why not %DBR:val1:val2:val3? That way we can make all strange metadata commands we like in the key, without fucking the URL up. AGL > > -S > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
