----- Original Message -----
From: "Mr.Bad" <[email protected]>


> >>>>> "GJ" == Gianni Johansson <giannijohansson at mediaone.net> writes:
>
>     GJ> I am not denying that your idea is clever. But the question
>     GJ> is, is it nescessary?
>
> Agreed. Frankly, if I have to change my stupid URL again, I'm going to
> be pissed. Not to mention that tools, etc. will have to change.
>
> Unless there's a real good reason, let's quit lofting WIBNI balloons.

Gee. I don't know. Maybe becuase we are going to break all the data on the
network in a few months so we can fix any mistakes we made before then
becuase at that point breaking a few other things isn't going to matter.
I've been thinking.

On the discussion of dbr keytypes:
I agree that being able to specify the dbr values in the name of the key
would be useful (becuase you can then, by just mangling the key, change
which version you are looking at) although for the initial lookup in many
cases you are still going to go to a redirect to find out what the dbr
interval is. Not a bad situation anyways.

I don't like the idea of giving it it's own keytype. We have enough TLA for
a few extra projects and they've been looking for them but can't find them.
Maybe we should help by not stealing them all. :p

> ~Mr. Bad
>
> --
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Mr. Bad <mr.bad at pigdog.org> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
>  freenet:MSK at SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-mathew


_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to