Adam Langley <agl at linuxpower.org> writes: > DocNames is flexable. There are many things which could be argued > should be in this and we don't want a new type (MSK, DBR) for every > one. Should should recognise that in the future we will have more. > > So why don't we generalise it? Setting DocName is only 1 thing that > metadata can do. Keep everything before // *as it is*. > > So for each metadata command you can specify some options. By > default I think we need to act like it's a docname in order for the > browsing trick to work. But why not %DBR:val1:val2:val3? > > That way we can make all strange metadata commands we like in the > key, without fucking the URL up.
That sounds good to me. -S _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
