Steve, Thanks for the brief glimmer of relief "Count me among those who look forward to the end of this thread " before you also piled on. I live in a family of tree hugging flaming liberals from my uncles to most of my brothers. I do not subscribe to the liberal belief that repeating something over and over makes it true. I think if you fallow the money you usually get to the truth. Find out who funds something then look into there beliefs. If is not a coincidence that the studies people and groups fund almost always aggress with their preconceived notions. It is obvious continuing this thread well serve no useful purpose. I am not saying you all do not believe what you are saying but who or what puts food on your tables. Does cheep energy help or hurt you make a living? Does AD some how directly or indirectly fund your activities? Would "climate change' being proven to be a hoax help or hurt your activities?
I have proven with my own money (not money from a grant, a study or some other out side source) that AD has a place with out regard for energy costs or global warming. AD can stand on its own in the bright light of day irrespective of our side influences. I do not make a living from AD in any way and so I can say it with out a political ax to grind. It is my bed time framers get up early around hear. Must get up early and turn the auger on to feed the AD in the AM Good night, B ----- Original Message ----- From: Steve Verhey To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 6:42 PM Subject: Re: [Digestion] Biogas conversation rates Count me among those who look forward to the end of this thread. Even so, I can't resist offering some data: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=48574 . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:31:30 -0800 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Digestion] Biogas conversation rates Eric, good points all, but let's not forget that Brent believes climate change is cooked up by conspirators. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, bingham <[email protected]> wrote: ...global warming has been debunked as junk science produced by a group of co conspirators paid to produce a set of data which would support an pre conceived agenda. On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Eric Buysman <[email protected]> wrote: Hence, when taking a holistic perspective, considering externalities, there is a good case to assume that fossil fuels are artificially cheap. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Digestion mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergylists.org for more information about digestion, see Beginner's Guide to Biogas http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/ and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/
_______________________________________________ Digestion mailing list to Send a Message to the list, use the email address [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE or Change your List Settings use the web page http://lists.bioenergylists.org/mailman/listinfo/digestion_lists.bioenergylists.org for more information about digestion, see Beginner's Guide to Biogas http://www.adelaide.edu.au/biogas/ and the Biogas Wiki http://biogas.wikispaces.com/
